No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 February 2020
A comparison of the manuscripts has shown that De li aspecti, the Italian version of Alhacen's De aspectibus, Vat. lat. 4595 (I), was copied from London, British Library, Royal 12.G.vii (L). The discovery of long omissions in L, not reproduced in I, disproves this conclusion. The error has two reasons: a sampling too small, the confusion between phenetic and cladistic approaches.
Une comparaison des manuscrits a montré que le De li aspecti, version italienne du De aspectibus d'Alhacen, Vat. lat. 4595 (I), était copié sur le London, British Library, Royal 12.G.vii (L). La découverte de longues omissions dans L, non reproduites par I, invalide cette conclusion. Deux raisons expliquent cette erreur : échantillonnage trop petit, confusion entre approches phénétique et cladistique.