Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:55:33.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring the adaptability of fleet segments to a fishing ban : the case of the Bay of Biscay anchovy fishery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2012

Get access

Abstract

While fishing resources available to fishermen are becoming increasingly scarce, management actions that regulate these resources are becoming more restrictive, to such an extent that some fisheries remain closed for years. The anchovy fishery in the Bay of Biscay, which was closed for 5 years, from 2005 to 2009, is one of the most important sources of revenue for the Basque pelagic purse-seiner fleet. Throughout the course of this closure the fleet was forced to find alternative revenue streams. In the present study, the fishing alternatives were analysed before and during the anchovy fishery closure, defining an adaptability indicator to measure the ability of the fleet to cope with fisheries closures. Four differently-behaved segments were found within the purse-seiner fleet. Only one of these segments managed to maintain the same level of turnover during the anchovy closure, while the others could not reach a minimum level of adaptability. Compensation of the fishery closure through financial aid was studied, analysing the impact that public aid had on the profit of each segment and on the adaptability indicator.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andonegi, E., Fernandes, J.A., Quincoces, I., Irigoien, X., Uriarte, A., Pérez, A., Howell, D., Stefánsson, G., 2011, The potential use of a gadget model to predict stock responses to climate change in combination with Bayesian networks : the case of Bay of Biscay anchovy. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 12571269. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranda M., Murillas A., Motos L., 2006, La base del conocimiento en la gestión de pesquerías : el caso del sistema de mandato y control de la Unión Europea. Rev. Galega Econ. 15, No. 1.
Arregi L., 2009, Análisis de los desembarcos de la flota de cerco costera en los puertos del País Vasco. Final report, Dir. Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Viceconsejería de Política e Industria Alimentaria, Dpto. Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Eusko Jaurlaritza, Gobierno Vasco.
Artetxe I., González de Zarate A., Ruiz J., 2008, Implantación en el País Vasco del plan de recuperación del atún rojo (Reglamento CE 643/07). Rev. Invest. Mar. 5, 15 p.
Branch, T.A., Hilborn, R., Haynie, A.C., Fay, G., Flynn, L., Griffiths, J., Marshall, K.N., Randall, J.K., Scheuerell, J.M., Ward, E.J., Young, M., 2006, Fleet dynamics and fishermen behavior : lessons for fisheries managers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 16471668. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles A.T., 2001, Sustainable fishery systems. Fish and aquatic resources series. Oxford : Blackwell Science.
Daures, F., Rochet, M.J., Van Iseghem, S., Trenkel, V.M., 2009, Fishing method, economic dependence and fish community impacts of French fleets in the Bay of Biscay during 2000– 2006. Aquat. Living Resour. 22, 535547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, E.A., Smith, A.D.M., Smith, D.C., van Putten, I.E., 2011, Human behaviour : the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish. 12, 217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S.M., Charles, A.T., 2008, Fishery systems and linkages : implications for science and governance. Ocean Coast. Manage. 51, 505527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garza-Gil, M.D., Varela-Lafuente, M.M., Caballero-Miguez, G., Álvarez Díaz, G., 2011, Analysing the profitability of the Spanish fleet after the anchovy moratorium using bootstrap techniques. Ecol. Econ. 70, 11541161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González M., Uriarte A., del Campo A., Egia N., Valencia V., Alzola E., Pozo R., 2009, Una revisión de la crisis creada por el accidente del Prestige en la costa del País Vasco : lecciones para el futuro. Rev. Invest. Mar. 12.
González, M., Uriarte, A., Pozo, R., Collins, M., 2006, The Prestige crisis : operational oceanography applied to oil recovery, by the Basque fishing flet. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 53, 369374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R., 2006, Fisheries success and failure: the case of the Bristol Bay salmon fishery. Bull. Mar. Sci. 78, 487498. Google Scholar
Hilborn, R., 2007, Managing fisheries is managing people: what has been learned ? Fish Fish. 8, 285296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibaibarriaga, L., Fernández, C., Uriarte, A., 2011, Gaining information from commercial catch for a Bayesian two-stage biomass dynamic model: application to Bay of Biscay anchovy. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 14351446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P.J., 2008, Introduction, in finding groups in data : an introduction to cluster analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Lehuta, S., Mahévas, S., Petitgas, P., Pelletier, D., 2010, Combining sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to evaluate the impact of management measures with ISIS-Fish : marine protected areas for the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 67, 10631075. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahevas, S., Vermard, Y., Hutton, T., Iriondo, A., Jadaud, A., Maravelias, D.C., Punzón, A., Sacchi, J., Tidd, A., Tsitsika, E., Marchal, P., Goascoz, N., Mortreux, S., Roos, D., 2011, An investigation of human vs. technology-induced variation in catchability for a selection of European fishing fleets. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 22522263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poos, J.J., Rijnsdorp, A.D., 2007, An “experiment” on effort allocation of fishing vessels : the role of interference competition an area specialization. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 304313. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, J.E., Abeare, S.M., 2009, Fishing effort redistribution in response to area closures. Fish. Res. 99, 216255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijnsdorp A.D., Piet G.J., Poos J.J., 2001, Effort allocation of the Dutch beam trawl fleet in response to a temporarily closed area in the North Sea. Internat. Counc. Explor. Sea, Copenhagen, ICES CM 2001/N :01.
Rodriguez-Marin, E., Moreno, G., Rodriguez-Cabello, C., Ortiz, M., Arrizabalaga, H., 2002, Description and evolution of the baitboat fleet targeting bluefin tuna in the Bay of Biscay from 1975 to 2000. SCRS/2001/131. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 54, 561573. Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Marin, E., Arrizabalaga, H., Ortiz, M., Rodriguez-Cabello, C., Moreno, G., Kell, L.T., 2003, Standardization of bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus, catch per unit effort in the baitboat fishery of the Bay of Biscay (Eastern Atlantic). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 12161231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseeuw, P.J., 1987, Silhouettes : a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 5365. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruitenbeek, H.J., 1996, The great Canadian fishery collapse : some policy lessons. Ecol. Econ. 19, 103106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, S., Gaertner, D., 2004, The behavioural dynamics of fishers : management implications. Fish Fish. 5, 153167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, S.A., 2010, Risk management for fisheries. Fish Fish. 11, 341365. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Irineo, E., Gaertner, D., Delgado de Molina, A., Ariz, J., 2011, Effects of time-area closure on tropical tuna purse-seiner fleet dynamics through some fishery indicators. Aquat. Living Resour. 24, 337350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermard, Y., Marchal, P., Mahévas, S., Thébaud, O., 2008, A dynamic model of the Bay of Biscay pelagic fleet simulating fishing trip choice : the response to the closure of the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) fishery in 2005. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65, 24442453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villamor B., Aranda M., Punzón A., Uriarte A., Báez J.C., 2008, The anchovy fishery in the Bay of Biscay : description and analysis of the Spanish fleet (2000–2005). ICES CM 2008/ :30.
Ward, J.H., 1963, Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 301, 236244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar