Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T13:23:16.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Turtle Excluder Devices on bycatch and discard reduction in the demersal fisheries of Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2011

Antonello Sala ,
Alessandro Lucchetti  and
Marco Affronte
Antonello Sala*
Affiliation:
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Scienze Marine (ISMAR), Sede di Ancona, National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR)Section of Ancona, Largo Fiera della Pesca, 60125 Ancona, Italy
Alessandro Lucchetti
Affiliation:
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Scienze Marine (ISMAR), Sede di Ancona, National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR)Section of Ancona, Largo Fiera della Pesca, 60125 Ancona, Italy
Marco Affronte
Affiliation:
Fondazione Cetacea ONLUS, Viale Torino 7/A, 47838 Riccione (RN), Italy
*
aCorresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The Central Mediterranean provides important neritic habitats for loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta), but Mediterranean bottom trawlers catch an estimated 30 000 turtles a year, with 25% mortality. Mortality by trawling is mainly due to enforced apnoea during towing activity. In order to reduce the submergence time and consequent turtle mortality, a specific technical modification was developed in the early 1980s: the Turtle Excluder Device (TED). In this paper, we field-tested a typical Supershooter TED and three new types of low-cost TED, built with different designs and materials, incorporating aspects of US and Australian TEDs, as well as design features to improve handling and catch rates. The performance of the TEDs was investigated under commercial fishing conditions in diverse trawling grounds in the Adriatic Sea (Mediterranean). All TEDs were easy to operate and did not require changes to normal fishing operations. Due to lack of entry of turtles it was not possible to evaluate the ability of the different TEDs to release turtles, but one large loggerhead turtle (C. caretta) was captured during the experimental tows and was successfully excluded by the Supershooter. The TEDs reduced anthropogenic debris and, consequently, sorting operations on board. Among the four TEDs tested, both the semi-rigid TED and the Supershooter performed in accordance with the design objectives: total discards were reduced but total commercial catches were not significantly reduced. With the Supershooter, all European hake (Merluccius merluccius) individuals equal to or above 16 cm were found in the codend and 10–15% of those between 5.0 and 15.5 cm were released. In general, the total discard rate of the TED-equipped nets was reduced to around 20–60%. Since the Council Regulation (EC) No. 1967/2006 called for a discard reduction policy in waters under the jurisdiction of the European Union, TEDs may have some broader value in this context.

Keywords

Bycatch-reduction deviceTEDDemersal trawlGeneralised linear mixed model (GLMM)Caretta carettaMediterranean Sea
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 183 - 192
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atabey, S., Taskavak, E., 2001, A preliminary study on the prawn trawls excluding sea turtles. Urun. Derg./ J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 18, 71–79. Google Scholar
Breslow, N.E., Clayton, D.G., 1993, Approximate inference in generalized linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 9–25. Google Scholar
Casale P., 2008, Incidental catch of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: captures, mortality, priorities. WWF Italy, Rome.
Casale, P., Laurent, L., De Metrio, G., 2004, Incidental capture of marine turtles by the Italian trawl fishery in the north Adriatic Sea. Biol. Conserv. 119, 287–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran W.G., 1977, Sampling techniques, Wiley, New York. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1967/2006 of 21 December 2006, Concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea, amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2847/93 and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1626/94. Official Journal of the European Union L.
Dremière, P.Y., Fiorentini, L., Cosimi, G., Leonori, I., Sala, A., Spagnolo, A., 1999, Escapement from the main body of the bottom trawl used for the Mediterranean International Trawl Survey (MEDITS). Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 207–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO, 1999, Managing fishing capacity: selected papers on underlying concepts and issues. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. No. 386, Rome, FAO.
Finney D.J., 1971, Statistical Method in Biological Assay, Griffin, London.
Fiorentini, L., Dremière, P.Y., Leonori, I., Sala, A., Palumbo, V., 1999, Efficiency of the bottom trawl used for the Mediterranean International Trawl Survey (MEDITS). Aquat. living Resour., 12, 187–205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonteyne R., 2005, Protocol for the use of an objective mesh gauge for scientific purposes. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. No. 279.
Fryer, R.J., 1991, A model of between-haul variation in selectivity. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 48, 281–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M.A., 1996, On bycatches. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 6, 319–352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, T.A., Stuntz, W.E., 1987, Analysis of sea turtle captures and mortalities during commercial shrimp trawling. Fish. Bull. 85, 813–817. Google Scholar
Holst, R., Revill, A., 2009, A simple statistical method for catch comparison studies. Fish. Res. 95, 254–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kot, C.Y., Boustany, A.M., Halpin, P.N., 2010, Temporal patterns of target catch and sea turtle bycatch in the US Atlantic pelagic longline fishing fleet. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67, 42–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, L., Lescure, J., 1994, L’hivernage des tortues caouannes Caretta caretta (L.) dans le sud tunisien. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 49, 63–86. Google Scholar
Laurent L., Abd El-Mawla E.M., Bradai M.N., Demirayak F., Oruc A., 1996, Reducing sea turtle mortality induced by Mediterranean fisheries: trawling activity in Egypt, Tunisia and Turkey, Report for the WWF International Mediterranean Programme, WWF Project 9E0103.
Lazar B., Margaritoulis D., Tvrtkovic N., 2000, Migrations of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) into the Adriatic Sea. In: Proc. 18th International Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, 3–7 March 1998, Mazatlan, Mexico, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC, Miami.
Lazar, B., Margaritoulis, D., Tvrtkovic, N., 2004, Tag recoveries of the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta in the eastern Adriatic Sea: implications for conservation. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 84, 475–480. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucchetti, A., Sala, A., 2010, An overview of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch and technical mitigation measures in the Mediterranean Sea. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 20, 141–161. Google Scholar
McConnaughey, R.A., Conquest, L., 1993, Trawl survey estimation using a comparative approach based on lognormal theory. Fish. Bull. 91, 107–118. Google Scholar
Margaritoulis D., 1988, Post-nesting movements of loggerhead sea turtles tagged in Greece. Rapp. P.V. Réun. Comm. Internat. Explor. Scient. Mer Méditerranée 31, 284.
Mitchell J.F., Watson J.W., Foster D.G., Caylor R.E., 1995, The turtle excluder device (TED): a guide to better performance, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC.
Prat, J., Antonijuan, J., Folch, A., Sala, A., Lucchetti, A., Sardà, F., Manuel, A., 2008, A simplified model of the interaction of the trawl warps, the otterboards and netting drag. Fish. Res. 94, 109–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team, 2009, R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, URL www.R-project.org.
Robins, J.B., McGilvray, J.G., 1999, The AusTED II, an improved trawl efficiency device, 2. Commercial performance. Fish. Res. 40, 29–41. Google Scholar
Sala, A., Lucchetti, A., Buglioni, G., 2004, The change in physical properties of some nylon (PA) netting samples before and after use. Fish. Res. 69, 181–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, A., Priour, D., Herrmann, B., 2006, Experimental and theoretical study of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) selection in codends of Mediterranean bottom trawls. Aquat. Living Resour. 19, 317–327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, A., Lucchetti, A., Buglioni, G., 2007, The influence of twine thickness on the size selectivity of polyamide codends in a Mediterranean bottom trawl. Fish. Res. 83, 192–203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, A., Lucchetti, A., Piccinetti, C., Ferretti, M., 2008. Size selection by diamond- and square-mesh codends in multi-species Mediterranean demersal trawl fisheries. Fish. Res. 93, 8–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, A., Lucchetti, A., 2010, The effect of mesh configuration and codend circumference on selectivity in the Mediterranean trawl Nephrops fishery. Fish. Res. 103, 63–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, A., Prat, J., Antonijuan, J., Lucchetti, A., 2009, Performance and impact on the seabed of an existing- and an experimental otterboard: Comparison between model testing and full-scale sea trials. Fish. Res. 100, 156–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stabenau, E.K., Heming, T.A., Mitchell, J.F., 1991, Respiratory, acid-base and ionic status of Kemp’s ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempi) subjected to trawling. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 99, 107–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A.D., Robins, J.B., McPhee, D.P., 1997, Adopting TEDs in Australia and the USA: what differences are there in technology transfer, promotion and acceptance. Coast. Manage. 25, 405–421. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudela S., 2004, Ecosystem effects of fishing in the Mediterranean: an analysis of the major threats of fishing gear and practices to biodiversity and marine habitats. Studies and Reviews, General Fish. Comm. Mediterranean, FAO, Rome, No. 74.
Watson, J.W., Epperly, S.P., Shah, A.K., Foster, D.G., 2005, Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 965–981. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

OLM - alr110010 - 24-2 (2011) p183 - Effects of Turtle Excluder Devices...

Erratum

Download OLM - alr110010 - 24-2 (2011) p183 - Effects of Turtle Excluder Devices...(PDF)
PDF 42.5 KB