Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:22:59.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A histological examination of grafting success in pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera in French Polynesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2010

Nathalie Cochennec-Laureau
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Centre Océanologique du Pacifique, BP 7004, Vairao, Polynésie française
Caroline Montagnani
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Centre Océanologique du Pacifique, BP 7004, Vairao, Polynésie française
Denis Saulnier
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie, 17390 La Tremblade, France
Angélique Fougerouse
Affiliation:
Service de la perliculture, Fare Ute, Papeete, Polynésie française
Peva Levy
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Centre Océanologique du Pacifique, BP 7004, Vairao, Polynésie française
Cedrik Lo
Affiliation:
Service de la perliculture, Fare Ute, Papeete, Polynésie française
Get access

Abstract

Pearl oyster grafting is a complex surgical operation that should lead to pearl formation after approximately eighteen months. Although this technique has been used for many years in French Polynesia, the grafting process is still not standardised. While studies have been carried out in order to improve graft performance and yield, these remain highly variable due to post-grafting mortality, nucleus rejection and unreliable pearl quality, all of which constrain pearl farm profitability. The present study uses histological analysis to monitor oysters that either rejected or retained their nuclei. Both groups of oysters are compared in terms of evolution of the graft, which could influence retention, and the development of a pearl sac in cases where grafting was successful. Data show that rejection phenomena are linked to a number of causes, notably an inflammatory reaction in the “receiving” oyster, the presence of numerous tissue lesions and the quality of the grafted tissue. These results suggest that study is needed on the different concomitant elements of the grafting process: the graft “donor” oysters, the nucleus and the “receiving” oyster and their interactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta-Salmon, H., Martínez-Fernández, E., Southgate, P.C., 2005, Use of relaxants to obtain saibo tissue from the blacklip pearl oyster (Pinctada margaritifera) and the Akoya pearl oyster (Pinctada fucata). Aquaculture 246, 167172. CrossRef
Acosta-Salmon, H., Southgate, P.C., 2005, Mantle regeneration in the pearl oysters Pinctada fucata and Pinctada margaritifera. Aquaculture 246, 447453. CrossRef
Acosta-Salmon, H., Southgate, P.C., 2006, Wound healing after excision of mantle tissue from the Akoya pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 143, 264268. CrossRef
Aoki, S., 1966, Comparative histological observations on the pearl sac tissues forming nacreous, prismatic and periostracal pearls. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 32, 1-10. CrossRef
Arnaud-Haond, S., Goyard, E., Vonau, V., Herbaut, C., Prou, J., Saulnier, D., 2007, Pearl formation: persistence of the graft during the entire process of biomineralization. Mar. Biotechnol. 9, 113116. CrossRef
Caseiro J., 1993, La nacre noire de Polynésie : biominéralisation, paramètres et processus de croissance, effets chromatiques dans la coquille et la perle de Pinctada margaritifera. Thèse doctorat, Univ. Claude Bernard, Lyon I.
Caseiro, J., 1995, Thickness evolution of deposits of organic and aragonitic materials during the growth of Pinctada-margaritifera pearls. C.-R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II A Sci. Terre Planètes 321, 916.
Dix, T.G., 1973, Histology of the mantle and pearl sac of the pearl oyster Pinctada maxima (Lamellibranchia). J. Malacol. Soc. Aust. 2, 365375.
Herbaut, C., Hui, B., Herbaut, J., Remoissenet, G., Boucaud, E., 2000, The pearl: isolation of outside bodies by molluscs : evolution of the graft and the pearl-sac in Pinctada margaritifera (Mollusca, Lamellibranchia). Bull. Soc. Zool. France 125, 6373.
Mamangkey, G., Southgate, P.C., 2009, Regeneration of excised mantle tissue by the silver-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima (Jameson). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 27, 164174. CrossRef
Hui B., 2001, Étude de la différenciation cellulaire au cours de l'évolution du greffon puis du sac perlier, chez l'huître perlière Pinctada margaritifera L. (Mollusca Lamellibranche). Thèse doctorat, Univ. Polynésie française, Papeete.
Le Duc H.T., 1997, Conséquences de quelques techniques d'élevage de la nacre Pinctada margaritifera (Linnée, 1758) var. cumingii (Jameson, 1901): mortalité et indice de condition. Mémoire EPHE, Perpignan.
Norton, J.H., Dashorst, M., Lansky, M., Mayer, R.J., 1996, An evaluation of some relaxants for use with pearl oysters. Aquaculture 144, 3952. CrossRef
Norton, J.H., Lucas, J.S., Turner, I., Mayer, R.J., Newnham, R., 2000, Approaches to improve cultured pearl formation in Pinctada margaritifera through use of relaxation, antiseptic application and incision closure during bead insertion. Aquaculture 184, 117. CrossRef
Riuz-Rubio, H., Acosta-Salmon, H., Olivera, A., Southgate, P.C., Rangel-Davalos, C., 2006, The influence of culture method and culture period on quality of half-pearls (“mabé”) from the winger pearl oyster Pteria sterna Gould, 1851. Aquaculture 254, 269274. CrossRef
Shaw, B.L., Battle, H.I., 1957, The gross and microscopic anatomy of the digestive tract of the oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Can. J. Zool. 35, 325347. CrossRef
Wada, K.T., Komaru, A., 1996, Color and weight of pearls produced by grafting the mantle tissue from a selected population for white shell color of the Japanese pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii (Dunker). Aquaculture 142, 2532. CrossRef