Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:01:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Longitudinal development of English morphology in French immersion children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Vicky A. Gray  and
Catherine Ann Cameron
Vicky A. Gray*
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick
Catherine Ann Cameron
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick
*
Vicky A. Gray, Psychology Department, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaE3B 5A3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Development of plural and past tense morphological rules was examined longitudinally with 272 English-speaking children enrolled in French immersion or traditional English curricula. Children were tested in grades one through four on 18 items from Berko's test (1958). There were no performance differences between the two curriculum groups, girls performed better than boys, and there were correlations between intelligence and performance. Syllables requiring the plural /-z/ and past tense /-d/ and /-t/ were acquired earlier than those calling for /-∂z/ or /-∂d/. Inflection acquisition was orderly and sequential within subjects. By age 10 children began using adultlike irregular formations, but regular or overregularized forms preceded irregulars. Whereas basic rules were mastered by 10 years, more difficult forms were still developing.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , May 1980 , pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anisfeld, M., & Tucker, G. R.English pluralization rules of six-year-old children. Child Development. 1967, 38, 1201–1217.Google ScholarPubMed
Bellamy, M. M., & Bellamy, S. E.The acquisition of morphological inflections by children four to ten. Language Learning, 1970, 20, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berko, J.The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 1958, 14, 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. L.The ability of deaf and hearing children to apply morphological rules. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1967, 10, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S.Language development (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. D. A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In Reiss, A. J. Jr. (Ed.), Occupations and social status. Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Foley, H. M., & Locke, J. L.Young children's Knowledge of morphological and phonological rules. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1971, 4, 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gliebink, J. W., Neville, A. R., & Davidson, R. E.Acquisition of morphological rules and usage as a function of social experience. Psychology in the Schools, 1970, 7, 217–221.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V. A., & Cameron, C. A.Summary report of French immersion evaluation. Fredericton, N. B.: University of New Brunswick, 1978.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E., & Tucker, G. R.Bilingual education of children. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1972.Google Scholar
Natalicio, D. S., & Natalicio, L. F. S. “The child's learning of English morphology” revisited. Language Learning. 1969, 19, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orme, J. E.Hypothetically true norms for the Progressive Matrices tests. Human Development, 1966, 9, 222–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selby, S.The development of morphological rules in children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 42, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Barik, H. C.Five years of primary French immersion: Annual reports of the Bilingual Education Project to the Carleton Board of Education and the Ottawa Board of Education up to 1975. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1976.Google Scholar