Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:06:05.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of literariness in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

DENISA BORDAG  and
MARIA ROGAHN
DENISA BORDAG*
Affiliation:
University of Leipzig
MARIA ROGAHN
Affiliation:
University of Leipzig
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Denisa Bordag, Herder-Institut, University of Leipzig, Beethovenstr. 15, 04107 Leipzig, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In two reading experiments involving a self-paced reading task, we explored how literariness affects initial stages of incidental vocabulary acquisition during reading in second language German. In Experiment 1, literariness was operationalized along the formalist, language-driven approach, focusing on the role of literary devices and their assumed ability to draw readers’ attention to the verbal message itself. In Experiment 2, we included conventions related to reading fiction (book title, author name, and year of publishing) to modulate the reader’s mode of text processing, which defines literariness according to reader-driven approaches (e.g., reception theory). Contrary to the expectations based on the noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 2012), we did not observe any advantage for incidental vocabulary acquisition in literary texts compared to nonliterary ones. However, in accordance with claims taking into account the limits of cognitive resources, we found evidence that acquisition of unknown words is impeded, if these directly participate in a literary device.

Keywords

incidental vocabulary acquisitionliterarinessL2 reading
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 399 - 425
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2007). Methodological considerations in performing semantic and translation priming experiments across languages. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 1–18.Google Scholar
Altarriba, J., & Canary, T. M. (2004). Affective priming: The automatic activation of arousal. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 248–265.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2004). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A lexical input processing approach. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 200–208.Google Scholar
Bobb, S. C., Kroll, J. F., & Jackson, C. N. (2014). Lexical constraints in second language learning: Evidence on grammatical gender in German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S1366728914000534Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Opitz, A., & Tschirner, E. (2014). To store or not to store, and if so, where? An experimental study on incidental vocabulary acquisition by adult native speakers of German. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (Eds.), The processing of lexicon and morphosyntax. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Opitz, A., & Tschirner, E. (2015). Incidental acquisition of new words during reading in L2: Inference of meaning and its integration in the L2 mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 372–390. doi:10.1017/S1366728914000078Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Opitz, A., & Tschirner, E. (2016). Incidental acquisition of grammatical features during reading in L1 and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 445–483.Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Rogahn, M., & Tschirner, E. (2016). The role of orthotactic probability in L1 and L2 incidental and intentional vocabulary acquisition. Second Language Research, 33, 147–178. doi:10.1177/0267658316665879Google Scholar
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Rogahn, M., & Tschirner, E. (2017). Semantic representation of newly learned L2 words and their integration in the L2 lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 197–212.Google Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Kutas, M. (2012). Once is enough: N400 indexes semantic integration of novel word meanings from a single exposure in context. Language Learning and Development, 8, 278–302. doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.614893Google Scholar
Bredella, L., & Burwitz-Melzer, E. (2004). Rezeptionsästhetische Literaturdidaktik: Mit Beispielen aus dem Fremdsprachenunterricht Englisch. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Burke, M. (2011). Literary reading. Cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burke, M., & Troscianko, E. T. (2013). A special issue on Explorations in Cognitive Literary Science. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42.Google Scholar
Carminati, M. N., Stabler, J., Roberts, A. M., & Fischer, M. H. (2006). Readers’ responses to sub-genre and rhyme scheme in poetry. Poetics, 34, 204–218.Google Scholar
Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In T. Huckin & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 225–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmondson, W. (1997). The role of literature in foreign language learning and teaching: Some valid assumptions and invalid arguments. AILA Review, 12, 42–55.Google Scholar
Elgort, I. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367–413.Google Scholar
Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Steven, M., & Van Assche, E. (2017). Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye-movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0272253117000109Google Scholar
Elgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014). L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables: L2 vocabulary learning from reading. Language Learning, 64, 365–414.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2007). The weak interface, consciousness, and form-focused instruction: Mind the doors. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 17–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. (1983). Automatic and controlled processes in the first- and second-language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 11, 565–574. doi:10.3758/BF03198281Google Scholar
Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Prince, P. (1997). Second language autonomy. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 481–501.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children’s narrative and expository reading materials. Applied Linguistics, 25, 1–37. doi:10.1093/applin/25.1.1Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S., … Yoon, H. (2017). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S136672891700021Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J. (2004). Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38, 193–218.Google Scholar
Hallet, W., & Nünning, A. (2007). Neue Ansätze und Konzepte der Literatur-und Kulturdidaktik. Retrieved from the TU Darmstadt website:http://www.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/tocs/190871423.pdf Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold Limited.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. (1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23, 363–380.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. (1998a). Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 19, 565–580.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. (1998b). The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26, 63–80.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. I. (2001a). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22, 295–323.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. I. (2001b). What we know about reading poetry: Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. H. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hartung, F., Withers, P., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2017). When fiction is just as real as fact: No differences in reading behavior between stories believed to be based on true or fictional events. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1618.Google Scholar
Hoffstaedter, P. (1987). Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 16, 75–91.Google Scholar
Hoorn, J. (1996). Psychophysiology and literary processing: ERPs to semantic and phonological deviations in reading small verses. Advances in Discourse Processes, 52, 339–360.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1994). Die Appellstruktur der Texte. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik (pp. 126–162). Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., & Van Patten, B. (2013). Research methods in second language psycholinguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D., & Jagerski, J. (2015). Experimental design in sentence processing research: A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 1–32.Google Scholar
Keidel, J. L., Davis, P. M., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Martin, C. D., & Thierry, G. (2013). How Shakespeare tempests the brain: Neuroimaging insights. Cortex, 49, 913–919.Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 627–633. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.627Google Scholar
Kotz, S. A., & Elston-Güttler, K. E. (2004). The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2: Reaction times and event-related potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 215–235. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00058-7Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1970). Linguistics and literary style. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (2001). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levin, S. R. (1965). Internal and external deviation in poetry. Word, 21, 225–239.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2005). Means of mass memorization of multi-word expressions: Part one. The power of sounds. Humanising Language Teaching, 7.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008a). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 29, 200–222.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008b). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The mnemonic power of assonance. System, 36, 423–436.Google Scholar
Lu, D. (2008). Revisiting the use of literary text in L2 learning. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, 12, 68–87.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. (2003). Psycholinguistic techniques in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 19, 144–161.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mestres-Missé, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1858–1866.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (2006). Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies . New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327–341.Google Scholar
Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. (1999). Influence of text genre on adults’ monitoring of understanding and recall. Educational Gerontology, 25, 691–710.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, J. (1964). A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style. In P. Garvin (Ed.), Standard language and poetic language (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Learning and teaching vocabulary. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Available at http://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=rg8Aue4jJWkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1 3&dq=Nation,+I.S.P.+&ots=YnBJeI2aAU&sig=EW MxRSxczE3ZCN2TtSEtqb W6Y7o Google Scholar
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Marienboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.Google Scholar
Parikbakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 9–29.Google Scholar
Parikbakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, K. (1997). Vocabulary and comprehension: Two portraits. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 55–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.Google Scholar
Pulido, D. (2003). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53, 233–284.Google Scholar
Pulido, D. (2004). The effect of cultural familiarity on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Reading Matrix, 4, 20–53.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U., Richter, M., & Biemann, C. (2006). Corpus portal for search in monolingual corpora. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, A. Gangemi, B. Megaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 1799–1802). Genoa, Italy: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Rezaee, A. A., & Norouzi, M. H. (2011). Readability formulas and cohesive markers in reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 1005–1010.Google Scholar
Rieder, A. (2002a). A cognitive view of incidental vocabulary acquisition: From text meaning to word meaning. Views, 11, 53–71.Google Scholar
Rieder, A. (2002b). Beiläufiger Vokabelerwerb: Theoretische Modelle und empirische Untersuchungen (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany).Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 630–678). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161–176.Google Scholar
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589–619.Google Scholar
Scheepers, C., Mohr, S., Fischer, M. H., & Roberts, A. M. (2013). Listening to limericks: A pupillometry investigation of perceivers’ expectancy. PLOS ONE, 8, e74986. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074986Google Scholar
Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three concepts of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. Perspectives on Individual Characteristics and Foreign Language Education, 6, 27–50.Google Scholar
Shokouhi, H. S., & Maniati, M. (2009). Learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition: A case on narrative and expository texts. English Language Teaching, 2, 13–23.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.Google Scholar
Thierry, G., Martin, C. D., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Rezaie, R., Roberts, N., & Davis, P. M. (2008). Event-related potential characterisation of the Shakespearean functional shift in narrative sentencestructure. NeuroImage, 40, 923–931.Google Scholar
Urano, K. (2000). Lexical simplification and elaboration: Sentence comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1081–1087.Google Scholar
van den Hoven, E., Hartung, F., Burke, M., & Willems, R. M. (2016). Individual differences in sensitivity to style during literary reading: Insights from eye-tracking. Collabra, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Cognitive processing of literary discourse. Poetics Today, 1, 143–159.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J. (2006). Foregrounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 546–551). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W., Zyngier, S., & Hakemulder, J. (2007). Foregrounding: Past, present, future. In D. Hoover & S. Lattig (Eds.), Stylistics: Prospect and retrospect (pp. 1–23). Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Waring, R., & Nation, I. S. P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4, 97–110.Google Scholar
Waugh, L. R. (1980). The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today, 2, 57–82.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232–245.Google Scholar
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13–40.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N., & Cheung, A. (2011). Using priming to explore early word learning. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 73–103). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Winko, S. (2009). Auf der Suche nach der Weltformel. Literarizität und Poetizität in der neueren literaturtheoretischen Diskussion. In S. Winko, F. Jannidis, & G. Lauer (Eds.), Grenzen der Literatur: zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen (pp. 374–396). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yaping, G., & Yuying, L. (2017). Foregrounding theory in novel translation: A case study of the translation of The Journey to the West. Studies in Literature and Language, 15, 28–32.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. L. (1994). Language symbols and foregrounding. Journal of Foreign Language, 6.Google Scholar
Zhang, T. T. (2017). Foregrounding theory in novel translation. East Journal of Translation, 45, 18–22.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1991). Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface-structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.4.920Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bordag and Rogahn supplementary material

Bordag and Rogahn supplementary material 1

Download Bordag and Rogahn supplementary material(File)
File 37 KB