Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:55:40.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stochastic models for interference between searching insect parasites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Phil Diamond
Phil Diamond
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Competition between a finite number of searching insect parasites is modelled by differential equations and birth-death processes. In the one species case of intraspecific competition, the deterministic equilibrium is globally stable and, for large populations, approximates the mean of the stationary distribution of the process. For two species, both inter- and intraspecific competition occurs and the deterministic equilibrium is globally stable. When the birth-death process is reversible, it is shown that the mean of the stationary distribution is approximated by the equilibrium. Confluent hypergeometric functions of two variables are important to the theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , January 1989 , pp. 268 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1989

References

[1]Appell, P. and Kampé de Fériet, J., Fonctions hypergéomè;triques et hypersphériques (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1926).Google Scholar
[2]Becker, N. G., “A stochastic model for two interacting populations,” J. Appl. Prob. 7 (1970), 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Erdelyi, A. et al. , Higher Transcendentat Functions (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953–55).Google Scholar
[4]Force, D., “Competition among four Hymenopterous parasites of an endemic insect host,” Ann. Ent. Soc. America 63 (1970), 1675–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hassell, M. P, The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems (Princeton University Press, 1978).Google ScholarPubMed
[6]Hokyo, N. and Kiritani, N., “Oviposition behaviour of two egg parasites, Asolcus Mitzukurii Ashmead and Telenomus Nakagawai Watanabe,” Entomophaia 11 (1966), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hokyo, N. et al. , “The effect of intra- and interspecific conditioning of host eggs on the ovipositional behaviour of two scalionid eggs parasites of the Southern Green Stink Bug,” Nezara Viridula L., Jap. J. Ecology 16 (1966), 67–71.Google Scholar
[8]Karlin, S. and McGregor, J., ‘Linear growth and applications of special multidimensional Hahn polynomials,” in Theory and applications of special functions (ed. Askey, R. A.), (Academic Press, New York, 1975), 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Krall, H. L. and Scheffer, I. M., “Orthogonal polynomials in two variables,” Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. 76 (1967), 325–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kurtz, T. C., Approximation of population processes (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Letessier, J. and Valent, G., “The generating function method for quadratic asymptotically symmetric birth and death processes,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 44 (1984), 773–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]May, R. M., Stability and complexity in model ecosystems (2nd ed., Princeton University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
[13]Miller, W. R., Symmetry and separation of variables (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1977).Google Scholar
[14]Rogers, D. J. and Hassell, M. P., “General models for insect parasite searching behaviour: interference,” J. Anim. Ecol. 43 (1974), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Szekeres, G., “Regular iteration of real and complex functions,” Acta Math. Scand. 100 (1958), 203–258.Google Scholar