Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:30:52.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The visual in archaeology: photographic representation of archaeological practice in British India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sudeshna Guha
Sudeshna Guha*
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Photographs produced during archaeological fieldwork can be employed in shaping the nature of archaeological discourse in different parts of the world. Such photographs are material objects that at times show what written texts fail to say. The focus of this paper is on the photographs produced during archaeological surveys and excavations in British India between the last quarter of the 19th and middle of the 20th centuries.

Keywords

photographyrepresentationarchaeological practiceIndia
Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 76 , Issue 291 , March 2002 , pp. 93 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, M. & Morphy, H.. 1997. Introduction: rethinking visual anthropology, in Banks, M. & Morphy, H. (ed.), Rethinking visual anthropology: 1–35. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Banta, M. & Hinsley, C. M.. 1986. Archaeology： intermingling of human past and present, through the camera’s eye, in Banta, M. & Hinsley, C. M. (ed.), From site to sight: anthropology, photography and the power of imagery. 72–99. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum Press.Google Scholar
Bayly, S. B. 1999. Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, G. 1895. Some Notes on Past and Future Archaeological Explorations in India, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland for 1895: 649–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. 1902. The Great Stupa at Sanchi-Kanakheda, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland for 1902: 29–45.Google Scholar
Canning (Lord), . 1862. Minute by the Right Hon’ble the Governor General of India in Council on the Antiquities of Upper India—dated 22nd January 1862, in Cunningham (1871) Preface to Four Reports made during the years 1862–63–64–65: I. Simla: Govt. Central Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, B. S. 1996. Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: the British in India. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H. 1867. Extract from a Memorandum offering suggestions for collecting information about the ancient architecture of India, by Lieutenant H.H. Cole, R.E., dated Naini Tal, June 1867, in Cole (1882): Appendix A.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H. 1882. First Report of the Curator of Ancient Monuments in India for the Yenr 1881–82. Simla: Govt. Central Press.Google Scholar
Desmond, R. 1974. Photography in India during the nineteenth century. London: India Office Library and Records Report.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. 1992a. Introduction, in Edwards (ed,): 3–17.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. (Ed.). 1992b. Anthropology and photography: 1860–1920. New Haven (CT)/London: Yale University Press in association with the RAI.Google Scholar
Falconer, J. 1990. Photography in nineteenth-century India, in Bayly, C. A. (ed.), The Raj: India and the British 1600–1947: 264–77. London: National Portrait Gallery Publications.Google Scholar
Falconer, J. 2000. A passion for documentation: architecture and ethnography, in Dehejia, Vidya (ed.), India through the lens： photography 1840–1911: 69–118. Washington (DC): Freer Gallery of Art/Arthur M. Sackler Gallery.Google Scholar
Fergusson, J. 1868. Memorandum by James Fergusson, esq. (1868), regarding objects in India of which it is desirable casts should he obtained, in Cole (1882): Appendix B.Google Scholar
Gero, J. & Root, D.. 1990. Public presentations and private concerns: archaeology in the pages of the National Geographic, in Gathereole, P. & Lowenthal, D. (ed.), The politics of the past: 19–37. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Pinney, C. 1997. Camera Indica: the social life of Indian photographs. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. 1971. On photography, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Spencer, F. 1992. Some notes on the attempt to apply photography to anthropometry during the second half of the nineteenth century, in Edwards (ed.): 99–107.Google Scholar
Srivastava, K. M. 1982. New ero of Indian Archaeology. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.Google Scholar
Stratham, F. F. 1860. On the application of photography to scientific pursuits, British Journal of Photography 121(7): 191–2.Google Scholar
Tagg, J. 1988. The burden of representation: essays on photographs and histories. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M. 1956. Archaeology from the earth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar