Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:38:59.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A symbol — but of what? Iron Age daggers, Alessi corkscrews and anthropoid embellishment reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2011

Jack Carlson*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Oxford University, 36 Beaumont Street, Oxford OX1 2PG, UK (Email: [email protected])

Extract

An ingenious derivation for the La Tène dagger with anthropoid hilt shows how craftsmen gave an agreeable character to a working weapon. The dagger remained every bit as effective, but the splayed person on the hilt added a touch of playful luxury to the serious business of stabbing. By way of a modern anthropoid corkscrew, the author lures us away from an obsession with symbolism and encourages us to look for a more down-to-earth ‘psychological functionality’ in decorated objects.

Type
Research article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhouse-Green, M. 2002. Any old iron! Symbolism and ironworking in Iron Age Europe, in Aldhouse-Green, M. & Webster, P. (ed.) Artefacts and archaeology: aspects of the Celtic and Roman world: 819. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, M. 2004. An archaeology of images: iconology and cosmology in Iron Age and Roman Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagley, R. 1987. Ancient Chinese bronzes from the Arthur M. Sackler collections. Volume 1: Shang ritual bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler collections. Washington (DC): Arthur M. Sackler Foundation; Cambridge: Arthur M. Sackler Museum & Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bulard, A. 1980. Sur deux poignards de la fin de l'époque de La Tène. Etudes Celtiques 17: 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R.R. & Hawkes, C.F.C.. 1955. An iron anthropoid sword from Shouldham, Norfolk, with related continental and British weapons. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 21: 198227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1997. The ancient Celts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Déchelette, J. 1913. Manuel d'archéologie préhistorique, celtique et gallo-romaine. Volume 2: archéologie celtique ou protohistorique. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Drilhon, F. & Duval, A.. 1985. Méthode d'étude des poignards anthropö?des de La Tène, in Bonnamour, L., Duval, A. & Guillamet, J-P. (ed.) Les âges du fer dans la vallée de la Saône: VIIe -Ier siècles avant notre ère; Paléométallurgie du bronze à l'âge du fer: actes du VIIe colloque de l'Association Française pour l'Etude de l'Aĝe du Fer, Rully, 12-15 mai 1983: 299308. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A.P. 1996. Night and day: the symbolism of astral signs on later Iron Age anthropomorphic short swords. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 62: 373–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedberg, D. 1989. The power of images: studies in the history and theory of response. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, R.A. & Barton, R.A.. 2005. Psychology: red enhances human performance in contests. Nature 435: 239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jope, E.M. 2000. Early Celtic art in the British Isles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 1970. Art of the European Iron Age: a study of the elusive image. Bath: Adams & Dart.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 2002. A late La Tène anthropoid gripped sword in New York, in Kuzmová, K., Pieta, K. & Rajtár, J. (ed.) Zwischen Rom und dem Barbaricum: Festschrift für Titus Kolník zum 70. Geburtstag (Archaeologica Slovaca Monographiae 5): 407418. Nitra: Archäologisches Institut der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. & Megaw, M.R.. 1995. The nature and function of Celtic art, in Green, M.J. (ed.) The Celtic world: 345–75. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 2001. Celtic art: from its beginnings to the Book of Kells. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Morel, L. 1898. La Champagne souterrain: matériaux et documents ou résultats de trente-cinq années de fouilles archéologiques dans la Marne. Reims: Matot-Braine.Google Scholar
Petres, E.F. 1979. Some remarks on anthropoid and pseudo-anthropoid hilted daggers in Hungary, in Duval, P-M. & Kruta, V. (ed.) Les mouvements celtiques du Ve au Ier siècle avant notre ère: actes du XXVIIIe colloque organiseé à l'occasion du IXe Congreś international des sciences preíhistoriques et protohistoriques, Nice, le 19 septembre 1976: 171–8. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Pleiner, R. 1993. The Celtic sword. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sankot, P. 1995. Les épées pseudo-anthropö?des de Bohême, in Charpy, J-J. (ed.) L'Europe celtique du Ve au IIIe siècle avant J.-C.: contacts, échanges et mouvements de populations (Mémoires de la Société Archéologique Champenoise 9): 413–22. Sceaux: Kronos.Google Scholar
Sievers, S. 1982. Die mitteleuropäischen Hallstattdolche (Prähistorische Bronzefunde 6.6). München: Beck.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1925. A guide to antiquities of the Early Iron Age in the Department of British and Mediaeval Antiquities. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Stead, I.M. 2006. British Iron Age swords and scabbards. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Stead, I.M. & Rigby, V.. 1999. Iron Age antiquities from Champagne in the British Museum: the Morel Collection. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Vidal, M. 1983. Poignard anthropö?de de la nécropole Saint-Roch à Toulouse (Haute-Garonne). Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise 16: 377–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, K.L. 1990. Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zeller, K.W. 1980. Kriegswesen und Bewaffnung der Kelten, in Pauli, L. (ed.) Die Kelten in Mitteleuropa: Kultur, Kunt, Wirtschaft: 111–32. Salzburg: Amt der Salzburger Landesregierung, Kulturabteilung.Google Scholar