Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:23:50.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special section: Theory in French archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Scarre  and
Simon Stoddart
Christopher Scarre
Affiliation:
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, England
Simon Stoddart
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 279 , March 1999 , pp. 153 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernbeck, R. 1997. Theorien in der Archäohgie. Tübingen & Basel: A. Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Brun, P. 1987. Princes et princesses de la celtique: le premier age du fer en Europe, 850–450 av. J.C. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Guidi, A. 1988. Storia della Paletnologia. Bari: Biblioteta Universale Laterza.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991. Archaeological theory in contemporary European societies: the emergence of competing traditions, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades: 1–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peebles, C.S. 1998. Annalistes, Hermeneutics and Positivists. Squaring circles of dissolving problems, in Whitley, (ed.): 183–97.Google Scholar
Whitley, D.S. 1998. (ed.). Reader in archaeological theory. Post-processual and cognitive approaches. London: Routledge.Google Scholar