Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:04:59.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science, stratigraphy and the deep sequence: excavation vs regional survey and the question of gendered practice in archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Stephanie Moser
Stephanie Moser*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Do gender roles, or expectations about gender roles, affect what kind of study is pursued by the individual researcher? Has excavation been rather a man's business? And if so, have other kinds of study — regional survey, for example — rather become women's business? These issues are explored as they are illuminated by the research careers of two eminent Australian contemporaries.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 270 , December 1996 , pp. 813 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abir-Am, P. & Outram, D. (ed.). 1987. Uneasy careers and intimate lives: women in science, 1789-1979. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Aisenberg, N. & Harrington, M.. 1988. Women of academe: outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst [MA): Univerity of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, K. et al. (ed.). 1988. Women and archaeology, Archaeological lieview from Cambridge 7(1).Google Scholar
Balme, J. & Beck, W. (ed.). 1995. Gendered archaeology: the second women in archaeologv conference. Canherra: ANH Publications.Google Scholar
Beck, W. 1994. Women in archeology: Australia and the United States, in Nelson et al.: 99–104.Google Scholar
Beck, W. & Head, L.. 1990. Women in Australian prehistory, Australian Feminist Studies 11: 29–48.Google Scholar
Belshaw, J. 1900. The economic basis of Aboriginal life in northern New South Wales in the 19th century. BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of History. University of New England.Google Scholar
Bleier, R (ed.). 1986. Feminist approaches to science. New York (NY): Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bowdler, S. 1993a. Review of David Horton, Recovering the tracks. Australian Archaeology 37:68.Google Scholar
Bowdler, S. 1993b. Views of the past in Australian prehistory, in Spriggs, M. et al. (ed.), A community of culture: the people and prehistory of the Pacific: 123-38. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 21.Google Scholar
Bradley, C. & Dahl, U.. 1994. Productivity and advancement of women archeologists, in Nelson et al.: 189-94.Google Scholar
Bkayshaw, H. C. 1966. Some aspects of the inaterial culture of the Aborigines of the Hunter Valley at the time of the first white settlement in the area. BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of History, University of New England.Google Scholar
Camphell, I. C. 1969. The relations between settlers and Aborigines in the pastoral district of New England, 18321860. BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of History, University of Now England.Google Scholar
Cass, B., Dawson, M., Temple, D., Wills, S. & Winkler, A.. 1983. Why so few? women academics in Australian universities. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, M. K. (ed.). 1991. Women in academe, progress and prospects. New York (NY): Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Claassen, C. (ed.). 1992. Exploring gender through archaeology. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press. Monographs in World Archaeology 11.Google Scholar
Clark, J.D.G. 1989. Prehistory at Cambridge and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colley, J.R. 1979. Fair science: women in the scientific community. New York (NY): Free Press.Google Scholar
Colley, J.R. 1981. Women in science, American Scientist 69: 385-91.Google Scholar
Cole, J. R. & Cole, S.. 1973. Social stratification in science. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Colley, S. In press. Sisters are doing it for themselves? Gender, feminism and Australian (Aboriginal) archaeology, in Hurcombe, L. & Donald, M. (ed.), proceedings of the conference ‘Gender and material culture: From prehistory to the present’. Exeter 1994.Google Scholar
Conkey, M. W. 1992. Men and women in prehistory: an archaeological challenge, in Brettell, C. B. & Sargent, C.F. (ed)., Gender in cross-cultural perspective: 41–50. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Conkey, M. W. & Gero, J. M.. 1991. Tensions, pluralities, and engendering archaeology: an introduction to women in prehistory, in Gero & Conkey: 3–30.Google Scholar
Conkey, M. W. & Spector, J. D.. 1984. Archaeology and the study of gender, Advances in archaeological method und Iheorv 7: 1–38.Google Scholar
Conkey, M. W. & Williams, S. H.. 1991. Original narratives: the political economy of gender in archaeology, in Leonardo, M. di (ed.), Gender at the crossroads of knowledge: feminist anthropology in the post-modern era: 68–89. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, O.G.S. 1953. Archaeology in the field. London: Phoenix House.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. 1962. The idea of prehistory. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Ducros, H. & Smith, L. (ed.). 1993. Women in archaeology: a feminist critique. Canberra: Department of Prehistory. Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 23.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterlinc, A. 1985. Myths of gender: biological theories about women and men. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gero, J. M. 1983. Gender bias in archaeology: a cross-cultural perspective, in Gero, J. M. et al. (ed.), The socio-politics of archaeology: 51-7. Amherst (MA): Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts. Research Report 23.Google Scholar
Gero, J. M. 1985. Socio-politics and the woman-at-home ideology, American Antiquity 50: 342–50.Google Scholar
Gero, J. M. 1988. Gender bias in archaeology: here, then, and now, in Rosser, S. (ed.), Feminism within the science and health care professions: overcoming resistance: 33–43. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Gero, J. M. In press. Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data, in Wright, R. (ed.), Gender in archaeology. Pittsburgh (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gero, J.M. & Conkey, M. W. (ed.). 1991. Engendering archaeology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gornick, V. 1983. Women in science. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Gould, M. & Buckley, K.. 1994. Training and working environments for women and men in archeology: Victoria, Australia, in Nelson et al: 43-6.Google Scholar
Hallam, S. J. 1982. Review of The Moth Hunters by Flood, J., Aboriginal History 6: 154–9.Google Scholar
Hammel, E.A., Mason, C., Prater, A. & Lunuy, R. (ed.). 1993. Gender and jobs: the academic market in anthropology 1964—1987, in Working papers of the program in population research. Berkeley (CA): Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Hanen, M. & Kelley, J.. 1992. Gender and archaeological knowledge, in Embree, L. (ed.), Metaarchueology: 195–225. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1989. Primate visions: gender, race and nature in the world of modem science. New York (NY): Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1986. The science question in feminisim. New York (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1991. Whose science? whose knowledge? Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (Ed.). 1993. The racial economy of science. Bloomington (IN): University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. & Hintikka, M. (ed.). 1983. Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Harding, S, & O'Bark, J. F. (ed.). 1987. Sex and scientific inquiry. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, J. 1994. On the margin: women, archeology, and cultural heritage — an Australian case study, in Nelson et al.: 105-13.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1983. A feeling for the organism: the life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco (CA): W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1992. Secrets of life, secrets of death: essays on language, gender, and science. New York (NY): Routledge.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. & Stark, M.. 1988. The status of women in archaeology, Anthropology Newsletter 29(9: 1, 11–12.Google Scholar
Lampert, R. J. 1981. The Great Kartan Mystery. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. Terra Australis 5.Google Scholar
Lane, K. H. 1970. The Nambucca Aborigines at the time of first white settlement: A study of [heir adaption to an environment, as revealed by ethnohistorical sources. BA (Hons.) thesis. Department of History, University of New England.Google Scholar
Longino, U. E. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton (N)): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, U. E. 1992. Essential tensions — phase two: feminist, philosophical and social studies of science, in McMullin, E. (ed.), The social dimensions of science: 198–216. Notre Dame (IL): University of Notre; Dame Press. Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1961. Now radio-carbon dates for Australia, Antiquity 25: 312-13.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1962a. Archaeological field survey work in northern New South Wales, Oceania 33: 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBryde, I. 1962b. Prehistory of northern New South Wales, Education Gazette 56:12.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1963a. Archaeology in New England, in Warner, R.F (ed.), Studies of environment in northern New South Wales: 63–70. Annidale: University of New England.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1963b. Research into the prehistory of northern New South Wales, University of Sydney Archaeological Broadsheet.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1963c. An unusual series of stone arrangements near the Serpentine River, Ebor district, New South Wales, Oceania 34:137-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBryde, I. 1964a. The linear engravings of the Clarence Valley, northern New South Wales, Oceania 34: 201-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBryde, I. 1964b. Rock art of the Australian Aborigines in northern New South Wales: a survey of discoveries in the New England District. Illustrated London Nem's (January) 4:14.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1965a. Radiocarbon dates for archaeological sites in the Clarence Valley, northern New South Wales, Oceania 35(4): 265–6.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1965b. Radiocarbon dates for northern New South Wales, Australian Journal of Science 27:260.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1966a. Radiocarbon dates for northern New South Wales, Antiquity 40: 285-92.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1966b. An archaeological survey of the Now England Region, New South Wales. Ph.D thesis, Department of History, University of New England.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1966c. Australian archaeology and the Historical Society, Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society 52(4):329–35.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1968. Archaeological investigations in the Graman district, Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 3:77–93.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1971. Australia's prehistoric colonisation, Proceedings of the Townsville Historical Trust: 35–58.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1974, Aboriginal prehistory in New England: An archaeological survey of northeastern New South Wales. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1978. Records of times past. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1980. Educational goals of university schools of prehistory and archaeology: mechanik trades in the ivory tower?, Australian Archaeology 11: 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBryde, I. 1986. Australia's once and future archaeology, Archaeology in Oceania 21: 13–28.Google Scholar
McBryde, I. 1993. ‘In her right place …’? Women in archaeology, past and present, in duCros & Smith (ed.): xi-xv.Google Scholar
Mccarthy, F. D. 1970. The Institute's work — 1961 to 1970, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Newsletter 3(1):1–17.Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1988. Science in a different voice, American Philosophical Quarterly 25(2):129–40.Google Scholar
Mies, M. 1991. Women's research or feminist research? the, debate surrounding feminist science and methodology, in Fonow, M. M. & Cook, J. A. (ed.), Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research: 60–84. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, E. L. (ed.). 1991. Women in British archaeology. Birmingham: Institute Field Archaeology.Google Scholar
Moser, S. 1995a. The ‘Aboriginalisation’ of Australian archaeology: the contribution of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies to the indigenous transformation of the discipline, in Ucko, P. J. (ed.), Theory in archaeology: a world perspective: 150-77. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moser, S. 1995b. Archaeology and its disciplinary culture: the professionalisation of Australian prehistoric archaeology. Ph.D thesis, Department of Prehistory and Historical Archaeology, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. 1952. Why dig up the past?, Twentieth Century 6(3): 27–40.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. 1957. Research into the prehistory of Victoria: a criticism and a report on a field survey, Historical Studies of Australia and New Zealand 8: 32–43.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. 1960. Recent archaeological excavations in Australia, Journal of the Polynesian Society 69(2): 151–3.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. 1961. The Stone Ago of Australia, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 27: 56–107.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. 1963. Prehistory, in Shells, H. (ed.), Australian Aboriginal Studies: 33–51. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. (Ed.). 1968. Australian archaeology: a guide to field techniques. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Nelson, M.C., Nelson, S. M. & Wylie, A. (ed.). 1994. Equity issues forwomen in archaeology. Washington (DC): American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Pardoe, C. 1990, Sharing the past: Aboriginal influence on archaeological practice, a case study from New South Wales, Aboriginal History 14(2):208–23.Google Scholar
Pardoe, C. 1992. Arches of radii, corridors of power: reflections on current archaeological practice, in Attwood, B. & Arnold, J. (ed.), Power, knowledge and Aborigines: 132-41. Melbourne: La Trobe University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. G. 1971. The effects of aquatic foods on the diet and economy of the Aborigines on the north coast of New South Wales at the time of first settlement. BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of History, University of New England.Google Scholar
Pinsky, V. & Wylie, A.. 1995. Preface, in Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology. 2nd edition. Albuquerque (NM): University of Now Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Poiner, G. 1990. The participation of women in academic research. Sydney: Women's Studies Centre, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Poiner, G. & Bourke, R.. 1988. No primrose path: women as staff at the University of Sydney. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Rossiter, M. 1982. Women scientists in America: struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sabinio, N. 1970. An ethnohistory of the Clarence Valley. BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of Classics & Ancient History, University of New England.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. 1989. The mind has no sex? Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. & Ducros, H.. 1994. Equity and gender in Australian archaeology: a survey of the ‘Women in Archaeology’ conference, 1991, in Nelson et ah: 115-20.Google Scholar
Solomon, B. M. 1985. In the company of educated women: a history of womenjand higher education in America. New Haven (GT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spector, J. 1993. What this awl means: feminist archaeologists at a Wahpeton Dakota Village. St Paul (MN): Minnesota Historical Society Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. 1964. The material culture of the Aborigines of the Richmond and Tweed rivers of northern New South Wales, at the time of first white settlement. BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of History, University of New England.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. 1970. The traditional culture of the Aborigines of north western New South Wales. MA thesis, Department of Classics & Ancient History, University of New England.Google Scholar
Walde, D. & Willows, N. (ed.). 1991. The archaeology of gender. Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference.Google Scholar
Webb, J. M. & Frankel, D.. 1995. Gender inequity and archaeological practice: a Cypriot case study, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(2): 93–112.Google Scholar
Webster, C. & Burton, M.. 1992. Summary report on the academic employment of women in anthropology, Anthropology Newsletter 33(2): 1, 21, 23.Google Scholar
White [Schrire], C. 1967a. Plateau and plain: prehistoric investigations in Arnhem Land. Northern Territory. Ph.D thesis. Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
White [Schrire], C. 1967b. The prehistory of the Kakadu people, Mankind 6(9):426–31.Google Scholar
Wildesen, L. E. 1980. The status of women in archaeology: results of a preliminary survey, Anthropology Newsletter 21:5–7.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. G. & Byrne, E. M.. 1987. Women in the university. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1991. Gender theory and the archaeological record: why is there no archaeology of gender?, in Gero & Conkey: 31–54.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological work on gender, American Antiquity 57(1):15–35.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. Forthcoming. Gender politics and scientific archaeology: the challenge of ‘gender research’ in archaeology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar