Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:13:33.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pots vs. vases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Karen D. Vitelli*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Program in Classical Archaeology, Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47405, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, D.E. 1975. Ceramic ecology of the Ayacucho Basin, Peru: implications for prehistory, Current Anthropology 16(2): 183206.Google Scholar
Arnold, D.E., Neff, H. & Bishop, R. 1991. Compositional analysis and ‘sources’ of pottery: an ethnoarchaeological approach, American Anthropologist 93(1): 7090.Google Scholar
David, N. & Hennig, H. 1972. The ethnography of pottery: a Fulani case seen in archaeological perspective. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley. Module 21.Google Scholar
Dietler, M. & Herbich, I. 1989. Tick Matek: the technology of Luo pottery production and the definition of ceramic style, World Archaeology 21: 148–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1985. Artful crafts: the influence of metalwork on Athenian painted pottery, journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 108–28.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1986 (ed.). Pots and pans: a colloquium on precious metals and ceramics in the Muslim, Chinese and Graeco-Roman worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar