Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T12:22:40.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Double identity in Orissa's Golden Triangle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. James*
Affiliation:
59 Mawson Road, Cambridge CB1 2DZ, England

Extract

The Medieval Hindu temples of Puri, Rhubaneswar and Konark are promoted as Orissa's version of northern India's ‘Golden Triangle’ of Agra, Fatehpur Sikri and Jaipur. One of the less affluent States in India, Orissa stands to benefit from tourism (FIGURE 1). The promotion seeks to appeal to all Indians and foreigners and also to prompt an image of Orissa as a distinct region. Such duality is typical among the diversity of community, ethnic, communal, federalist and national values at issue in India (Chatterjee 1993: 75).

Cultivation of the temples is nothing new. Whatever the original purposes of icons, significance is ascribed, not simply inherent. It depends on economic or political interest and context (Cohen 1985). Harrison (1999) has argued that images of ethnicity tend to be defended as if at risk of pollution or theft by outsiders. Under the influence of European ideology, the commonest symbol for ethnic or nationalist aspiration is language but religion and other markers of culture have been used too (Smith 1981). Other than religion, one of the criteria for invoking the temples is the discipline of archaeology. However, archaeology too is a Western conceptual idiom (Cohn 1983: 209). Although literacy — including in the ‘English medium’ — is spreading, archaeology is not appreciated by everyone in Orissa. Partly for that reason, there have been various views as to how the temples should be presented and to whom.

Type
Special section
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, S. 1991. Puri: a centre of pilgrimage of an eclectic shrine, in Jha, M. (ed.), Social anthropology of pilgrimage: 21725. New Delhi: Inter-India.Google Scholar
Arnott, M.H. 1903. Report with photographs of the repairs executed to some of the principal temples at Bhubaneswar and caves in the Khandagiri and Udaigiri Hills, Orissa, India, between 1898 and 1903. London: Waterlow.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. & Pollock, S.. 1996. Ayodhya, archaeology, and identity, Current Anthropology 37 Supplement: 13842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, N.K. 1932. Canons of Orissan architecture. Calcutta: Chatterjee.Google Scholar
Boulton, J. 1979 Nationalism and tradition in Orissa, with special reference to the works of Phakirmohana Senapati, in Moore, R.J. (ed.), Tradition and politics in South Asia: 22860. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P. 1993. The nation and its fragments: colonial and postcolonia] histories. Princeton (NI): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chauley, G.C. 1993. Conservation of Lord Jagannath Temple. Puri. Bhubaneswar: Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.P. 1985. The symbolic construction of community. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, B.S. 1983. Representing authority in Victorian India, in Hobsbawm, E. & Ranger, T. (ed.), The invention of tradition: 165209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dash, G.N. 1978. Jagannatha and Oriya nationalism, in Eschmann, et al. (ed.): 35974.Google Scholar
Eschmann, A., Kulke, H. & Tripathi, G.C. (ed.). 1978. The cult at Jagannath and the regional tradition of Orissa. New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Fergusson, J. 1876. History of Indian and Eastern architecture (A history of architecture in all countries from the earliest times to the present day 3). 2nd edition. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Fergusson, J. 1884. Archaeology in India with especial reference to the works of Babu Rajendralala Mitra. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 1999. Cultural boundaries, Anthropology Today 15(5): 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indian Archaeology. N.d. Indian Archaeology 1899–1905. British Library, Oriental & India Office Mss. Eur.F.111.620.Google Scholar
Kulke, H. 1978. Royal temple policy and the structure of Medieval Hindu kingdoms, Early royal patronage of the Jagannatha cult, in Eschmann, et al. (ed.): 12555.Google Scholar
Lahiri, N. 1999. Bodh-Gaya: an ancient Buddhist shrine and its modern history (1891–1904), in Insoll, T. (ed.), Case studies in archaeology and world religion: the proceedings of the Cambridge conference: 3343. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International series S755.Google Scholar
Mishra, P.K. 1997. Utkal Union movement 1903–20, in Samal, J.K. (ed.), Comprehensive history and culture of Orissa 2(1): 22435. New Delhi: Kaveri.Google Scholar
Mishra, R.N. 1984 Regionalism and state politics in India. New Delhi: Ashish.Google Scholar
Mitra, D. 1992. Konarak. 4th edition. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Mitra, R. 1875–80. Antiquities of Orissa. Calcutta: Wyman and Newman.Google Scholar
Mohanty, N. 1982. Oriya nationalism: quest for a united Orissa, 1866–1936. New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Nayak, J. & Mishra, D.. 1994. Homeless deities and temple politics in Orissa, New Quest 106: 2279.Google Scholar
Orissa, . 1998. (Government of Orissa Department of Tourism.) Orissa, the soul of India. Bhubaneswar: Orissa Tourism.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D. 1981. The ethnic revival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thapar, B.K. 1984 India, in Cleere, H. (ed.), Approaches to the archaeological heritage: a comparative study of world cultural resource management systems: 6372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Two Bachelors of Arts. 1919. The Oriya movement: being a demand for a united Orissa. Aska: H.H. Panda.Google Scholar