Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:07:08.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Brexit syndrome: towards a hostile historic environment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Nathan Schlanger
Nathan Schlanger*
Affiliation:
Ecole nationale des chartes, Paris/UMR 8215 Trajectoires, Nanterre, France (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 92 , Issue 366 , December 2018 , pp. 1665 - 1668
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beasley-Murray, T. 2016. Brexit, or how to be serious after the referendum. The European Legacy 22: 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2016.1252572Google Scholar
Bonacchi, C., Altaweel, M. & Krzyzanska, M.. 2018. The heritage of Brexit: roles of the past in the construction of political identities through social media. Journal of Social Archaeology 18: 174–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605318759713Google Scholar
Brophy, K. 2018. The Brexit hypothesis and prehistory. Antiquity 92: 1650–58. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.160Google Scholar
Fazackerley, A. 2018. ‘There's no plan B’: academics race to safeguard research against Brexit. The Guardian, 16 October 2018. Available at. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/oct/16/academics-race-safeguard-research-against-brexit-universities (accessed 6 November 2018).Google Scholar
Gamble, C. 2018. President of the Prehistoric Society letter. The Guardian, 18 October 2018. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/oct/18/brexit-cutting-ourselves-off-from-our-past-and-from-science-funding (accessed 6 November 2018).Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & Harrison, R.. 2017. Brexit, archaeology and heritage: reflections and agendas. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 27: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5334/pia-548Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A., González, P. Alonso & Criado-Boado, F.. 2018. Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity 92: 507–15. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.227Google Scholar
Inglis, D. 2017. Against the academic Brexit industry: Brexit troubles for the social sciences—and how to cope with them. Global Journal of Archaeology & Anthropology 2: 555–87. https://doi.org/10.19080/GJAA.2017.02.555587Google Scholar
Masood, E., Vesper, I. & Noorden, R. Van. 2018. Six months to Brexit: how scientists are preparing for the split. Nature 56: 452–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06781-8Google Scholar
Pitts, M. 2017. British archaeology fears Brexit cost. British Archaeology Magazine May/June 154: 6.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N. 2013. Entering history? Archaeologists as intellectuals a la recherche du temps perdu. Archaeological Dialogues 20: 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S138020381300010XGoogle Scholar
Schlanger, N. 2016. ‘If not for you’. The nation-state as an archaeological context. Archaeological Dialogues 23: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203816000088Google Scholar
Schlanger, N. 2017. Brexit in betwixt. Some European conjectures on its predictability and implications. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 8: 212–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2017.1358324Google Scholar
The Sun. 2018. As MPs vote on Brexit today, we say to them: you have a choice… Great Britain or great betrayal, 12 June 2018, p. 1.Google Scholar
White, R.H. 2017. Brexit means…? The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 8: 171–72.Google Scholar