Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Close acquaintance with the geographical situation of the ancient sites of Iraq, and also of the Indus Valley, inevitably leaves two questions to haunt the mind. C Why did early man choose such inconvenient and inaccessible places, as many of them now are, for his settlements when he gave up nomad life ? And why after a site had been deliberately chosen for a city was it so frequently abandoned, though its occupation might already have extended through several centuries ?
These questions were first brought home to the writer in vivid fashion by a visit twenty years ago to the lonely and insignificant little mounds of Jemdet Nasr, some twenty-five miles from the ruins of Babylon and about halfway across the wide unin- habited desert between the lower Euphrates and Tigris rivers.
1 Ellsworth Huntingdon, Civilization and Climate, pp. 227 ff.
2 Frankfort, Cylinder Seals, pl. III, d and e.
3 Woolley, Ur Excavations, II : The Royal Cemetery, p. 71, pl. 169a.
4 Mackay, Further Excavations at Mohenjo-daro, 1927-31, pl. LXXXIX, A, and LXIX, 4.
5 Maps of Iraq with Notes for Visitors, 1929.
6 Frankfort, Cylinder Seals, pp. 224, 227 and 293.
7 E. Mackay, ‘A Sumerian Palace and the “A” Cemetery a Kish’, Anthropology Memoirs, Field Museum, Chicago, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 81.
* Compare the air-ph. of marks near Ur, ANTIQUITY III, 342.
8 The Antiquaries Journal, vol. X, pl. XXXIII.
9 Gadd, History and Monuments of Ur, p. 1.
10 Mackay, Further Excavations at Mohenjo-daro, 1927-1931, p. 4.
11 Le Strange, Lands of the Eastern Caliphate, chapters II-V.