Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:24:49.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Warfare and big game hunting: flaked-stone projectile points along the middle Gila River in Arizona

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2015

Chris Loendorf ,
Lynn Simon ,
Daniel Dybowski ,
M. Kyle Woodson ,
R. Scott Plumlee ,
Shari Tiedens  and
Michael Withrow
Chris Loendorf
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
Lynn Simon
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
Daniel Dybowski
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
M. Kyle Woodson
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
R. Scott Plumlee
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
Shari Tiedens
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
Michael Withrow
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85147, USA (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethnohistorical and ethnographic observations from around the world indicate that projectiles were often made differently for warfare and hunting. Using experiential archaeology and analysis of a thousand years’ worth of data from the middle Gila River in Arizona, the authors argue that side notched arrow points were produced for hunting large animals and were designed to be retrieved and reused, while unnotched points were intended for single use and for another purpose: to kill people. The data suggests furthermore that the region witnessed a steady increase in levels of violence during the period under study.

Keywords

Gila RiverArizonaArchaicpre-ClassicClassichistoricflaked-stone projectile pointsexperimental archaeologywarfarehunting
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 89 , Issue 346 , August 2015 , pp. 940 - 953
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahler, S.A. 1992. Use-phase classification and manufacturing technology in Plains Village arrow points, in Hofman, J.L. & Enloe, J.G. (ed.) Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology: 36–62 (British Archaeological Reports International series 578). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Bancroft, H.H. 1886. The native races of the Pacific states of North America: wild tribes. London: Longmans, Green & Company.Google Scholar
Basso, K.H. (ed.). 2004. Western Apache raiding and warfare: from the notes of Grenville Goodwin. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, C.A. & Newcomer, M.H.. 1983. Flint arrowhead breakage: examples from Ksar Akil. Journal of Field Archaeology 10: 238–43.Google Scholar
Bill, J.H. 1862. Notes on arrow wounds. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 40: 365–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441–186240880–00002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bill, J.H. 1882. Arrow wounds, in Ashhurst, J. (ed.) International encyclopedia of surgery: a systemic treatise on the theory and practice of surgery by authors of various nations: 103–18. New York: William Wood.Google Scholar
Catlin, G. 1975. Letters and notes on the North American Indians. New York: Gramercy Books.Google Scholar
Cheshier, J. & Kelly, R.L.. 2006. Projectile point shape and durability: the effect of thickness:length. American Antiquity 71: 353–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40035908 Google Scholar
Christenson, A.L. 1997. Side-notched and unnotched arrowpoints: assessing functional differences, in Knecht, H. (ed.) Projectile technology: 131–42. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterell, B. & Kamminga, J.. 1992. Mechanics of pre-industrial technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, C.J. 1997. Factors influencing the use of stone projectile tips: an ethnographic perspective, in Knecht, H. (ed.) Projectile technology: 37–74. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, W. 2014. Unnotched triangular points on village sites. American Antiquity 79: 363–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.7183/0002–7316.79.2.353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauvelle, M., Smith, E.M., Brown, S.H. & des Lauriers, M.R.. 2012. Asphaltum hafting and projectile point durability: an experimental comparison of three hafting methods. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 2802–2809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.014 Google Scholar
Géneste, J.-M. & Maury, S.. 1997. Contributions of multidisciplinary experiments to the study of Upper Paleolithic projectile points, in Knecht, H. (ed.) Projectile technology: 165–90. New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978–1–4899–1851–2_7 Google Scholar
Gifford, E.W. 1936. Northeastern and Western Yavapai. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 34 (4): 335–40.Google Scholar
Hunzicker, D. 2008. A folsom projectile technology: an experiment in design, effectiveness and efficiency. Plains Anthropologist 53: 91–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/pan.2008.020 Google Scholar
Jacoby, K. 2008. Shadows at dawn: a borderlands massacre and the violence of history. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Keeley, L.H. 1996. War before civilization: the myth of the peaceful savage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knecht, H. 1997. Projectile points of bone, antler and stone: experimental explorations of manufacture and use, in Knecht, H. (ed.) Projectile technology: 191–212. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Kroeber, C.B. & Fontana, B.L.. 1986. Massacre on the Gila: an account of the last major battle between American Indians, with reflections on the origin of war. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S.A. 1999. Prehistoric warfare in the American southwest. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Lekson, S.H. 2002. War in the southwest, war in the world. American Antiquity 67: 607–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593794 Google Scholar
Lipo, C.P., Dunnell, R.C. & O’Brien, M.J.. 2012. Beveled projectile points and ballistics technology. American Antiquity 77: 774–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.7183/0002–7316.77.4.774 Google Scholar
Loendorf, C. 2012. The Hohokam-Akimel O’odham continuum: sociocultural dynamics and projectile point design in the Phoenix Basin, Arizona (Gila River Indian Community Anthropology Research Papers 5). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Loendorf, C. 2014. Historic period Akimel O’odham projectile points and settlement patterns. Kiva 79: 81–101.Google Scholar
Loendorf, C. & Rice, G.E.. 2004. Projectile point typology, Gila River Indian Community, Arizona (Gila River Indian Community Anthropological Research Papers 2). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Loendorf, C., Fertelmes, C.M. & Lewis, B.V.. 2013. Hohokam to Akimel O’odham: obsidian acquisition at the historic period Sacate Site (GR-909), Gila River Indian Community, Arizona. American Antiquity 78: 266–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.7183/0002–7316.78.2.266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, O.T. 1894. North American bows, arrows, and quivers. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Milner, G.R. 2005. Nineteenth-century arrow wounds and perceptions of prehistoric warfare. American Antiquity 70: 144–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40035273 Google Scholar
Pope, S.T. 1923 (2000). Hunting with the bow and arrow. Miami Shores (FL): Sylvan toxophilite classics.Google Scholar
Rea, A.M. 1998. Folk mammalogy of the northern pimans. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Rea, A.M. 2007. Wings in the desert: a folk ornithology of the Northern Pimans. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Rice, G.E. 2001. Warfare and massing in the Salt and Gila Basins , in Rice, G. & LeBlanc, S. (ed.) Deadly landscapes: case studies in prehistoric southwestern warfare: 289–330. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Russell, F. 1908. The Pima Indians, in Twenty-sixth annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1904–1905: 3–389. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Shaw, A.M. 1994. A Pima past. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J., Davis, Z.J. & Brown, K.S.. 2001. Experimental tests of Middle Paleolithic spear points using a calibrated crossbow. Journal of Archaeological Science 28: 807–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2000.0590 Google Scholar
Shea, J.J., Brown, K.S. & Davis, Z.J.. 2002. Controlled experiments with Middle Paleolithic spear points: Levallois points, in Mathieu, J.R. (ed.) Experimental archaeology: replicating past objects, behaviors, and processes: 55–72 (British Archaeological Reports International series 1035). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Stevens, E.T. 1870. Flint chips: a guide to pre-historic archaeology. London: Bell & Daldy.Google Scholar
Tomka, S.A. 2013. The adoption of the bow and arrow: a model based on experimental performance characteristics. American Antiquity 78: 553–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.7183/0002–7316.78.3.553 Google Scholar
Waguespack, N.M., Surovell, T.A., Denoyer, A., Dallow, A., Savage, A., Hyneman, J. & Tapster, D.. 2009. Making a point: wood- versus stone-tipped projectiles. Antiquity 83: 786–800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598´00098999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, G. 1959. A Pima remembers. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J.C. 1994. Flintknapping, making, and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar