Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:50:43.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A response to Keates and Kuzmin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Feng Li ,
Steven L. Kuhn  and
Xing Gao
Feng Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142 Xizhimenwai Street, Beijing 100044, China (Email: [email protected]; [email protected])
Steven L. Kuhn
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Building 30, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0030, USA (Email: [email protected])
Xing Gao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142 Xizhimenwai Street, Beijing 100044, China (Email: [email protected]; [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Susan Keates and Yaroslav Kuzmin have contributed valuable comments on our assessment of the chronology and technological characteristics of Shuidonggou localities 1 and 2. These comments have demonstrated some discordance in our publications that should be corrected here. Their rationale for abandoning the conclusions altogether is, however, weak at best. Most importantly, there is no reason to return to the chronology for the Initial Upper Palaeolithic (hereafter termed IUP) assemblages at the Shuidonggou site complex (SDG) proposed by Madsen et al. (2001). Keates and Kuzmin's critique focuses on two separate issues: the first is our characterisation of the assemblages from the lower part of SDG 2, and the second is our handling of the dates. We will address these in order.

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 89 , Issue 345 , June 2015 , pp. 721 - 723
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Madsen, D.B., Li, J., Brantingham, P.J., Gao, X., Elston, R.G. & Bettinger, R.L.. 2001. Dating Shuidonggou and the Upper Palaeolithic blade industry in China. Antiquity 75: 706–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00089213 Google Scholar
Morgan, C., Barton, L., Yi, M., Bettinger, R.L., Gao, X. & Peng, F.. 2014. Redating Shuidonggou locality 1 and implications for the Initial Upper Paleolithic in East Asia. Radiocarbon 56: 165–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/56.16270 Google Scholar
Nian, X., Gao, X. & Zhou, L.. 2014. Chronological studies of Shuidonggou (SDG) locality 1 and their significance for archaeology. Quaternary International 347: 5–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.03.050 Google Scholar
Pei, S., Gao, X., Wang, H., Kuman, K., Bae, C.J., Chen, F., Guan, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Peng, F. & Li, X.. 2012. The Shuidonggou site complex: new excavations and implications for the earliest Late Paleolithic in North China. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3610–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.028 Google Scholar