Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:14:56.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Our fourth Lascaux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

N. James*
Affiliation:
Division of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK (Email: [email protected])

Extract

World's most famous archaeological replica, Lascaux II was replaced in December 2016 by Lascaux IV. IV deserves to inherit the reputation, but it is already struggling to cope as it seeks to outdo II's tally of visitors. The ironies are manifold.

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardeche. 2015. Available at: www.ardeche.fr/215-caverne-d-pont-d-arc.htm (accessed 23 June 2017).Google Scholar
Aujolat, N. 2005. The splendour of Lascaux: rediscovering the greatest treasure of prehistoric art. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bommelaer, C. 2017. Grotte Chauvet: déjà un million de visiteurs pour la Caverne du Pont d'Arc. Le Figaro, 14 February 2017.Google Scholar
Carman, J. 2002. Archaeology and heritage: an introduction. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Chassain, H. 2017. Lascaux 4: plus de 28000 visiteurs après un mois d'ouverture. Sud Ouest, 18 May 2017.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C., Gosden, C., James, N., Pitts, M. & Scarre, C.. 2014. New era for Stonehenge. Antiquity 88: 644–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00101280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coye, N. (ed.). 2011. Lascaux and preservation issues in subterranean environments: proceedings of the international symposium, Paris, February 26 and 27, 2009. Paris: Maison de sciences de l'homme.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. 1978. Editorial. Antiquity 52: 16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00051127 Google Scholar
Demoule, J.-P. 1998. Lascaux, in Nora, P. (ed.) Realms of memory: 162–90. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
James, N. 2009. The Acropolis and its new museum. Antiquity 83: 1144–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00099427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N. 2016. Replication for Chauvet Cave. Antiquity 90: 519–24. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2016.63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascaux. 2016. Centre International de l'Art Pariétal. Lascaux: visite presse. Available at: http://www.lascaux.fr/media/uploads/filemanager/dp_lascaux.pdf (accessed 23 June 2017).Google Scholar
Lipe, W.D. 1984. Value and meaning in cultural resources, in Cleere, H. (ed.) Approaches to the archaeological heritage: a comparative study of world cultural resource management systems: 111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacCannell, D. 2013. The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Périgord Noir. n.d. Pays du Périgord Noir. Le tourisme en Périgord Noir. Available at: http://www.pays-perigord-noir.com/cgi-bin/PPN/default.asp?p=tourisme_stats (accessed 23 June 2017).Google Scholar
Rigal, G. 2016. Le temps sacré des cavernes: de Chauvet à Lascaux, les hypothèses de la science. Paris: Corti.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 2004. Beyond the cave: Lascaux and the prehistoric in post-war French culture. French Studies 58: 219–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/58.2.219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snøhetta. 2017. We are Snøhetta. Available at: http://www.snohetta.com/about (accessed 23 June 2017).Google Scholar
Urry, J. & Larsen, J.. 2011. The tourist gaze (3rd ed.). Los Angeles (CA): Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vie Publique. 2014. Déclaration de Mme Aurélie Filippetti, ministre de la culture et de la communication, sur l'art préhistorique et la conservation des oeuvres de la grotte de Lascaux le 24 avril 2014. Available at: http://discours.vie-publique.fr/notices/143001656.html (accessed June 2017).Google Scholar