Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:18:57.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The two major capitals in the crypt of Saint-Bénigne at Dijon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2009

Rita Wood
Rita Wood
Affiliation:
Rita Wood, 25 St Andrewgate, York YO1 7BR, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The three-storey rotunda at Dijon, built by William of Volpiano and consecrated in 1018, has been reduced to its crypt, but an impressive pair of capitals survive adjacent to the burial place of St Bénigne. In modern times these capitals have repeatedly been described as full of monsters, and their significance for Romanesque sculpture has consequently been neglected. Enough remains of their dense, three-dimensional sculpture for them to be identified as representing, in fact, a lesson commonly read in masses for the dead. Numerous saints and martyrs were marked by burials in the crypt or by altars in the rotunda. All Saints’ Day was celebrated on 1 November, so that the main feast day of St Bénigne was transferred to 2 November. About 998, the commemoration of All Souls, also on 2 November, had been introduced by Odilo, Abbot of Cluny, and is likely to have been adopted by Abbot William. The text from 1 Thessalonians suggests the imaginative use of the rotunda’s vertical dimension, at this particular season and others.

Résumé

La rotonde à trois étages de Dijon, construite par Guillaume de Volpiano et consacrée en 1018, a été réduite à sa crypte, mais une impressionnante paire de chapiteaux, adjacents à la sépulture de St Bénigne, reste encore. Aux temps modernes, ces chapiteaux ont maintes fois été décrits comme fourmillant de monstres et leur importance dans le contexte de la sculpture romane a été par conséquent négligée. Il reste suffisamment de vestiges de leur dense sculpture tridimensionnelle pour permettre d’identifier ce qu’ils représentent, en fait une leçon souvent lue lors de messes pour les morts. De nombreux saints et martyrs étaient marquésdes sépultures dans la crypte ou par des autels dans la rotonde. La Toussaint était célébrée le 1er novembre, et la fête principale de S. Bénigne fut donc transférée au 2 novembre. Vers 998, la fête des Morts, également le 2 novembre, avait été introduite par Odilo, abbé de Cluny, et il est probable qu’elle avait été adoptée par l’abbé Guillaume. Le texte de 1 Thessaloniciens suggère l’utilisation inventive de la dimension verticale de la rotonde, à cette saison en particulier ainsi qu’à d’autres.

Zusammenfassung

Die dreistöckige chorscheitelrotunde in dijon, erbaut von wilhelm von volpiano und eingeweiht im jahr 1018 ist bis auf sein kryptengeschoss verfallen. Zwei imponierende kapitellsäulen sind in der benachbarten grabstätte des hl. Benignus erhalten. In der neuzeit wurden diese säulen häufig mit monstern in verbindung gebracht, und dadurch wurde deren bedeutung für die romanische baukunst vernachlässigt. Es ist genug von der dichten, dreidimensionalen skulptur erhalten, das eine inschrift als lehrtext interpretiert werden kann, der üblicherweise in totenmessen gelesen wurde. Vielen heiligen und märtyrern wurde durch gräber in der krypta oder durch altare in der rotunda gedacht. Allerheiligen wurde am 1. November gefeiert, so daß das fest des hl. Benignus auf den 2. November verlegt wurde. Im jahr 998 wurde der allerseelentag, auch der 2. November, durch odilo, abt von cluny, eingeführt und warscheinlich von wilhelm übernommen. Der text der 1 thessalonier deutete auf einen einfallsreichen gebrauch der vertikalen dimension der rotunda in dieser und anderen jahreszeiten hin.

Type
Original Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 89 , September 2009 , pp. 215 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, C K 1973. A Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, London: A & C BlackGoogle Scholar
Baylé, M 1992. Les Origines et les premiers développements de la sculpture romane en Normandie, Caen: Art de Basse-NormandieGoogle Scholar
Baylé, M 1996. ‘Les sculptures de la rotonde de Dijon’, in Jannet and Sapin 1996, 59–72Google Scholar
Bonnet, G 1986. ‘Augustine’s conception of deification’, J Theol Stud, 37.2, 369–386Google Scholar
Bulst, N 1996. ‘Guillaume de Dijon, le batisseur de la rotonde’, in Jannet and Sapin 1996, 19–29Google Scholar
Bynum, C W 1995. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Champeaux, G de Sterckx, S 1989. Introduction au Monde des Symboles, La Pierre-qui-Vire: ZodiaqueGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A S 2000. The Uta Codex: art, philosophy and reform in eleventh-century Germany, University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University PressGoogle Scholar
Conant, K J 1959. Carolingian and Romanesque Architecture 800–1200, Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Cross, F L 1997. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Evans, J 1931. Monastic Life at Cluny 910–1157, London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Geuenich, D 1991. ‘The St Gall confraternity of prayer’, in The Culture of the Abbey of St Gall: an overview (eds J C King and W Vogler), Zurich: Belser VerlagGoogle Scholar
Glaber, Rodulfus 1989. Historiarum libri quinque; Vita Domni Willelmi Abbatis (ed N Bulst, trans J France and P Reynolds) Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Green, R 1994. ‘The Adam and Eve cycle in the Hortus Deliciarum’, in Studies in Ottonian, Romanesque and Gothic Art (R Green), 26–41, London: Pindar PressGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, J F 2002. St John the Divine: the deified evangelist in medieval art and theology, Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Hearn, M F 1981. Romanesque Sculpture: the revival of monumental stone sculpture in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, Oxford: PhaidonGoogle Scholar
Heitz, C 1980. L’architecture réligieuse carolingienne: les formes et leurs fonctions, Paris: PicardGoogle Scholar
Iotsald von Saint-Claude 1999. Vita des Abtes Odilo von Cluny (ed J Staub), Hanover: Hahnsche BuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Jannet, M Sapin, C 1996. Guillaume de Volpiano et l’Architecture des Rotondes, Dijon: éditions Universitaires de DijonGoogle Scholar
Kabir, A J 2001. Paradise, Death and Doomsday in Anglo-Saxon Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, S (ed) 1996. Liber Vitae of the New Minster and Hyde Abbey, Winchester, Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & BaggerGoogle Scholar
Knight, J K Wood, R 2006. ‘St Gwynllyw’s Cathedral, Newport: the Romanesque archway’, Archaeol Cambrensis, 155, 163–185Google Scholar
Knowles, D Brooke, C 2002. The Monastic Constitutions of Lanfranc, rev edn, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, R Stiennon, J 1971. The Legend of Roland in the Middle Ages, New York: PhaidonGoogle Scholar
Levison, W 1946. England and the Continent in the Eighth Century, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Malone, C M 1996. ‘L’église de Guillaume de Volpiano et son lien avec la rotonde’, in Jannet and Sapin 1996, 45–58Google Scholar
Malone, C M 2000. ‘The Rotunda of Sancta Maria in Dijon as “Ostwerk” ’, Speculum, 75.2, 285–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, C M 2003. ‘St Bénigne in Dijon as Exemplum of Rodulfus Glaber’s metaphoric “white mantle” ’, in The White Mantle of Churches: architecture, liturgy, and art around the millennium (ed N Hiscock), 158–179, Turnhout: BrepolsGoogle Scholar
Martindale, A 1962. ‘The Romanesque church of St Bénigne at Dijon’, J Brit Archaeol Assoc, 25, 21–55Google Scholar
Mayr-Harting, H 1991. Ottonian Book Illumination: an historical study, London: Harvey MillerGoogle Scholar
Oursel, R 1979. Bourgogne Romane, La Pierre-qui-Vire: ZodiaqueGoogle Scholar
Pejrani-Baricco, L 1996. ‘L’église abbatiale de Fruttuaria à la lumière des dernières fouilles archéologiques’, in Jannet and Sapin 1996, 75–108Google Scholar
Richardson, A Bowden, J 1983. A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, London: SCMGoogle Scholar
Rowell, G 1977. The Liturgy of Christian Burial: an introductory survey of the historical development of Christian burial rites, London: Alcuin Club/SPCKGoogle Scholar
Sturm, E 1997. Die Michaelskirche zu Fulda, Fulda: Verlag ParzellerGoogle Scholar
Temple, E 1976. Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts 900–1066, London: Harvey MillerGoogle Scholar
Viñayo Gonzáles, A 1995. San Isidoro in León: the Royal Pantheon, the advent of Romanesque architecture, sculpture, painting, León: EdiesaGoogle Scholar
Walberg, E 1900. Le Bestiaire de Philippe de Thaün: texte critique, Lund: H J MöllerGoogle Scholar
Wheatcroft, J H 1999. ‘Classical ideology in the medieval bestiary’, in The Mark of the Beast (ed D Hassig), 141–159, New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Willis, G G 1962. St Augustine’s Lectionary, London: Alcuin Club/SPCKGoogle Scholar
Wollasch, J 1971. ‘A Cluniac necrology from the time of Abbot Hugh’, in Cluniac Monasticism in the Central Middle Ages (ed N Hunt), London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Wood, R 2001. ‘Geometric patterns in English Romanesque sculpture’, J Brit Archaeol Assoc, 154, 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T (ed and trans) 1841. Popular Treatises on Science written during the Middle Ages in Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Norman, and English, London: R & J E TaylorGoogle Scholar
Zarnecki, G 1972. The Monastic Achievement, London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
Zarnecki, G 1979a. ‘Romanesque sculpture in Normandy and England in the eleventh century’, in Proc Battle Conf on Anglo-Norman Studies, i (ed R Allen Brown), 168–89, 233–5Google Scholar
Zarnecki, G 1979b. ‘La Sculpture à Payerne’, in Studies in Romanesque Sculpture (G Zarnecki), London: Dorian PressGoogle Scholar