Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:31:59.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Marnian pottery and La Tène I brooch from Worth, Kent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2012

C. F. C. Hawkes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1940 , pp. 115 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 116 note 2 Arch. Cant, xxvi, 9 seqq.; Antiq. Journ. x, 166–7.

page 116 note 3 , Jessup, op. cit. 132, 134Google Scholar.

page 116 note 4 Arch. Journ. lxxxvii, 240 seqq., esp. 255.

page 116 note 5 Antiq. Journ. viii, 84.

page 116 note 6 Antiq. Journ. iv, 352–3, fig.3 (with fig. 9); Archaeologia, lxxvi, 19–21.

page 116 note 7 Antiq. Journ. viii, 453–8.

page 116 note 8 Prof. Ward Perkins's excavations are to be published in the forthcoming number of Archaeologia Canttana

page 118 note 1 In a paper on the pottery from the Caburn, near Lewes, and its implications, read before the Society on 9 March 1939 in conjunction with Dr.Curwen, E. Cecil, F.S.A. This is to appear in full in Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. lxxxGoogle Scholar.

page 118 note 2 The same method has been employed in repuWishing the Park Brow pieces in the forthcoming Caburn paper.

page 118 note 3 Cf. with Mr. Smith's fig. 15, a-e, the bases Arch, lxxvi, 19, fig.10 A-B (Park Brow) and Antiq. Journ. viii, 455–6, figs, qd and Si (Findon Park).

page 118 note 4 Cf., Morel, La Champagne Souterraine, album, pl. 41, no. 22Google Scholar: the incisions were perhaps, as there, filled with colouring matter.

page 118 note 5 Cf. Morel, ibid., pl. 4, nos. 4, 12; pl. 5, no. 6; pl. 20, one from right in central group, and middle bottom; pl. 41, 17.

page 119 note 1 Cf. Morel, ibid. pl. 32, nos. 6 and 8.

page 118 note 2 I have to thank Mr. Clarke for allowing me to read this in typescript; it is hoped that it will appear in the Archaeological Journal during 1940.

page 118 note 3 Arch. Camb. 06 1927, 67–112Google Scholar.

page 120 note 1 Viollier, D., Les Sépultures du Second Åge du Fer sur le Plateau Suisse (1916)Google Scholar.

page 120 note 2 Findo n Park: Arch, lxxvi, 11, fig. G (bropch) found in same pit as the two pots (21) figs. 11–12., Swallowcliffe: Wilts. Arch. Mag. xliii, 82, pl. xi, c. 36 (brooch)Google Scholar; pottery, e.g. 71, pl. iv, 4, 6 (cf. from Fifield Bavant, ibid, xlii, 477, pl. vn, 1–4). The glass beads from Swallowcliffe (xliii, 30–1, pl. vn, F 1–4) require the same context.

page 120 note 1 3 Fox's list no. 34;, Greenwell, British Barrows, 209, fig. 111Google Scholar;, Evans, Ancient Bronze Implements, 400, fig. 498Google Scholar.

page 120 note 4 This is in any case certainly true of Scotland:, Childe, Antiq. Journ. xi, 281–2Google Scholar; Prehistory of Scotland, 231, 236.

page 120 note 5 Fox's list nos. 5 8–9; Cunnington, All Cannings Cross, pl. xvm, figs. 12–13.

page 120 note 6 This dating is discussed in the Caburn paper referred to above (p. 118, n. 1).