Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:46:52.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Organizational Context in the History of Archaeology: Pitt Rivers and Other British Archaeologists in the 1860s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

William Chapman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of professional affiliations in the history of archaeology has tended to be underplayed. There have been a number of histories of individual professional societies and especially of museums, both of which had significant roles in the institutional development and acceptance of the field during the nineteenth century (e.g. Clark 1925; Evans 1949a, 1949b, 1956; Hawkes 1962; Hinsley 1981). Also, both museums and professional organizations have been generally touched upon in the course of biographies of individual archaeologists—primarily as background information (e.g. Evans 1943; Woodbury 1973; Green 1981; Hawkes 1982). What has not been considered sufficiently is the pervasive character of professional connections and the institutions or societies that made them possible (Trigger 1985; cf. Levine 1986). Organizations, together with accompanying journals, charters, meetings, statements of policy, special committees and so on, form the very basis of a discipline. This was particularly true in the nineteenth century when many sciences or other fields of interest—including archaeology—had yet to find a place in the academic world (Woodruff 1923).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 23 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Akerman, J. Y. 1847. Note on Wayland Smith's cave, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 1, 179Google Scholar
Altham, E. 1931. The Royal United Services Institution, 1831–1931, J. Roy. Unit. Serv. Inst., 76, 235–45Google Scholar
Anon. 1861. Bateman's Museum, Athenaeum, No. 1767, 321–2Google Scholar
Anon. 1900. General Pitt Rivers, Obit. Archaeol. J. 57, 174–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, E. C. R. 1920. The National Museum of Science and Art: Guide to the Collection of Irish Antiquities, DublinGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T. 1851. Ten Years Digging in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills, in the Counties of Derby, Stafford and York, LondonGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T. 1855. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities and Miscellaneous Objects presented to the Museum of Thomas Bateman of Lomberdale House, Derbyshire, BakewellGoogle Scholar
Beddoe, J. 1870. Presidential address, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 8, lxxv-lxxviGoogle Scholar
Birket-Smith, J. 1952. The history of ethnology in Denmark, J. Roy. Anthropol. Inst., 82, 115–28Google Scholar
Blake, C. 1863. On recent evidences of the extreme antiquity of the human races, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 1, xxvi-xxxivGoogle Scholar
Boucher de Crèvecoeur de Perthes, J. 1847–1864. Antiquitiés celtiques et antédiluvienes; mémoire sur l'industrie primitive et les arts a leus origine, 3 vols., ParisGoogle Scholar
Brabrook, E. W. 1910. On the Fellows of the Society of Antiquaries of London who have held the office of Director, Archaeologia, 62, 59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunholtz, H. B. 1943. The centenary of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Man, 43, 73–4Google Scholar
Braunholtz, H. B. 1953. History of ethnography in the Museum after 1753, pts 1 and 2, Brit. Mus. Quart., 18, 90–3, 108–20Google Scholar
Buckley, J. H. 1951. The Victorian Temper, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, W. L. 1965. The Age of Equipoise: A Study of the Mid-Victorian Generation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1963. Evolution and anthropology in the 1860s: the Anthropological Society of London, 1863–71, Via. Stud., 7, 137–54Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1966. Evolution and Society: A Study in Victorian Social Theory, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, R. 1865. Remains of the aboriginal inhabitants of Ireland, Gents. Mag., new ser., 18, pt. 1, 707–10Google Scholar
Caulfield, R. and Windell, J. 1864. Extracts from the journal of Thomas Dineley, and some account of his visit to Ireland, J. Kilkenny South-east Ireland Archaeol. Soc., new ser., 5, 40–8, 268–90Google Scholar
Chapman, W. R. 1981. Ethnology in the Museum: A. H. L. F. Pitt Rivers (1827–1900) and the Institutional Foundations of British Anthropology. Unpubl. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford Univ.Google Scholar
Chester, G. 1857. Exhibit of a weapon of flint found at Hoxne in Suffolk, Archaeol. J., 14, 287Google Scholar
Clark, L. C. G. 1925. The University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge, Antiq. J., 5, 415–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. L. 1945. Greek Studies in England, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Crawford, O. G. S. 1932. The dialectical process in the history of science, Soc. Rev., 24, 165–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawfurd, J. 1864. On Sir Charles Lyell's ‘Antiquity of Man’ and on Professor Huxley's ‘Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature’, Trans. Ethnol. Soc. London, 3, 58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cull, R. 1852. On the recent progress of ethnology. J. Ethnol. Soc. London, 3, 165–77Google Scholar
Daniel, G. 1943. The Three Ages: An Essay on Archaeological Method, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G. 1962. The Idea of Prehistory, Harmondsworth (1971)Google Scholar
Daniel, G. 1967. The Origins and Growth of Archaeology, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
Daniel, G. 1976. A Hundred and Fifty Years of Archaeology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Davis, J. B. and Thurman, J. 1865. Crania Britannica: Delineations and Descriptions of Skulls of the Aboriginal and Early Inhabitants of the British Islands, 2 vols., LondonGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, W. B. 1870. On the exploration of the Victoria Cave, Settle, Yorkshire, Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 148–9Google Scholar
Dunn, R. 1867. Archaeology and ethnology: remarks on some of the bearings of archaeology on certain ethnological problems and researches. Trans. Ethnol. Soc. London, 5, 305–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Joan 1943. Time and Chance: The Story of Arthur Evans and His Forebears, LondonGoogle Scholar
Evans, Joan 1949a. Ninety years ago, Antiquity, 23, 115–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Joan 1949b. The Royal Archaeological Institute: a retrospect, Archaeol. J., 106, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Joan 1956. The History of the Society of Antiquaries, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Evans, John 1859. On the occurrence of flint implements in undisturbed beds of gravel, sand and clay … in several locations both on the continent and in this country. Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 4, 329–33Google Scholar
Evans, John 1869. On the manufacture of stone implements in prehistoric times. Trans. 3rd Int. Cong. Prehist. Archaeol., 194–215Google Scholar
Evans, John 1871. On the occurrence of flint implements in the drift; their various types and characteristics, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 5, 165Google Scholar
Evans, John 1872. The general classification of stone implements of the neolithic period, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 5, 229Google Scholar
Forde-Johnston, J. 1974. History from the Earth, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1852. The collection of British antiquities in the British Museum, Archaeol. J., 9, 7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1853. On additions to the collections of national antiquities in the British Museum, Archaeol. J., 10, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1854. The additions to the collections of national antiquities in the British Museum, Archaeol. J., 11, 23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1865. An account of additions to the collections of British antiquities at the British Museum during the year 1864, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 3, 233–42Google Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1867. Exhibition of a bone implement found at the London Wall, Proc. Soc Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 3, 43Google Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1870. Catalogue of the Christy Collection of Prehistoric Antiquities and Ethnography, LondonGoogle Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1871. On the remains of primitive man, recently discovered in the caves and rock shelters of La Bordogne in France, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 5, 165Google Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1872. Address, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 5, 232–3Google Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1876. Catalogue of a Collection of Oriental Porcelain and Pottery, LondonGoogle Scholar
Franks, A. W. 1885. Japanese Pottery, LondonGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. W. 1961. A Hundred Years of Geography, LondonGoogle Scholar
Gillispie, C. C. 1951. Genesis and Geology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Grant-Duff, A. (ed.) 1924. The Life-Work of Lord Avebury (Sir John Lubbock) 1834–1913, LondonGoogle Scholar
Godwin-Austen, R. A. 1863. On the alluvial accumulation in the valley of the Somme and Ouse, Anthropol. Rev., 1, 438–40Google Scholar
Gray, H. St. G. 1905. Index to ‘Excavations in Cranbome Chase’, Taunton Castle, SomersetGoogle Scholar
Gray, H. St. G. 1906. Lieut.-General Pitt-Rivers, in Memoirs of Old Wiltshire (ed. A., Dryden), LondonGoogle Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1983. The Establishment of Human Antiquity, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Green, S. 1981. Prehistorian: A Biography of V. Gordon Childe, Bradford-on-AvonGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. W. 1965. Brixham Cave and the antiquity of man, in Context and Meaning in Cultural Anthropology (ed. M., Spiro), New YorkGoogle Scholar
Haber, F. 1959. The Age of the World: Moses to Darwin, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, F. W. 1874. The Origins and History of the First or Grenadier Guards, vol. 3, LondonGoogle Scholar
Har's Army Lists 1858–68, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. 1949. Britons, Romans and Saxons round Salisbury and in Cranborne Chase, reviewing the excavations of General Pitt-Rivers, 1881–97, Archaeol. J., 104, 27–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. 1962. The British Museum and British archaeology, Antiquity, 36, 248–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, J. 1982. Mortimer Wheeler: Adventurer in Archaeology, LondonGoogle Scholar
Henry, and Coghlin, 1864. Henry and Coghlin's Cork Directory and Almanac, CorkGoogle Scholar
Herity, M. 1969. Early finds of Irish antiquities from the minute books of the Society of Antiquaries of London, Antiq. J., 49, 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsley, C. 1981. Savages and Scientists: The Smithsonian Institution and the Development of Americar Anthropology, 1846–1910, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, T. 1848. On the progress of ethnology, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, 1, 27–45Google Scholar
Houghton, W. E. 1975. The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–70, New HavenGoogle Scholar
Hudson, K. 1981. A Social History of Archaeology: The British Experience, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. 1863a. Introductory address on the study of anthropology, Anthropol. Rev., 1, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. 1863b. Notes on the antiquity of man, Anthropol. Rev., 1, 72–107Google Scholar
Hunt, J. 1864. Presidential address, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 2, lxxx-xcvGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. 1865. On the negro's place in nature, Mem. Anthropol. Soc. London, 1, 1–64Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1869. On the distribution of the races of mankind and its bearing on the antiquity of man, Trans. 3rd Int. Cong. Prehist. Archaeol., 92–6Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1870a. On the geographical distribution of the chief modifications of man, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, new ser., 2, 404–12Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1870b. Presidential address to the Ethnological Society of London, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, new ser., 2, xvii-xxiiiGoogle Scholar
ICPA. International Congress of Prehistoric ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
International Congress of Prehistoric Archaeology 1869. Transactions of the Third Section, LondonGoogle Scholar
International Exhibition of 1862: Official Programme 1862. LondonGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. 1917. Presidential address: How can the Institute best serve the needs of anthropology, J. Roy. Anthropol. Inst., 47, 12–30Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1934. Centenary of the birth of Lord Avebury, Man, 34, 49–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemble, J. M. 1849. Introduction, Archaeol. J., 6, 1–3Google Scholar
Kendrick, T. D. 1951. British Prehistory, LondonGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, T. D. 1954. The British Museum and British antiquities, Antiquity, 28, 132–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, P. 1986. The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, Historians and Archaeologists in Victorian England 1838–1886, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1865. Prehistoric Times, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1873. The Origin and Metamorphosis of Insects, LondonGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1879. Addresses, Political and Educational, LondonGoogle Scholar
Lyon, J. 1970. The search for fossil man, Isis, 61, pt. 1, 68–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MaCalister, R. A. S. 1906. On some County Cork Ogham Stones in English museums, J. Roy. Soc. Antiq. Ir., 36, 166–78Google Scholar
MaCalister, R. A. S. 1921. Textbook of European Archaeology, vol. 1, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mantell, G. A. 1850. On the remains of map and works of art embedded in rocks and strata. Archaeol. J., 7, 327–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. 1973. That Noble Cabinet: A History of the British Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
Mitford, N. (ed.) 1938. The Ladies of'Alderley, LondonGoogle Scholar
Mitford, N. (ed.) 1939. The Stanleys of Alderley: Their Letters, Between the Years 1851–65, LondonGoogle Scholar
Morley, John. 1921. The Works of John Morley, vol. 3, LondonGoogle Scholar
Mosley, O. 1851. Inaugural discourse, delivered at the opening of the Derby Congress, J. Brit. Archaeol. Ass., 7, 179–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myres, J. L. 1944. A centenary of our work, Man, 44, 2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myres, J. N. L. 1946. The three ages: an essay in archaeological method, Engl. Hist. Rev., 61, 418–19Google Scholar
National Museum of Scotland 1935. A Short Guide to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Newton, C. 1851. On the study of archaeology, Archaeol. J., 8, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, K. P. n.d. The Problem of Man's Antiquity: An Histoical Survey, Geology Bull., 5, vol. 9, Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Dept., LondonGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, E. 1852. Introductory address, Archaeol. J., 9, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossory, S. A. 1907. Dublin, LondonGoogle Scholar
Owen, R. S. 1894. The Life of Richard Owen, 2 vols., LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. J. 1850. On the study of archaeology, J. Brit. Archaeol. Ass., 6, 169–73Google Scholar
Plggott, S. 1937. Prehistory and the romantic movement, Antiquity, 11, 31–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plggott, S. 1949. British Prehistory, LondonGoogle Scholar
Plggott, S. 1959. Approach to Archaeology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Plggott, S. 1976. Ruins in a Landscape: Essays in Antiquarianism, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1854. The Instruction of Musketry, HytheGoogle Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1858. On the improvement of the rifle as a weapon for general use, J. Roy. Unit. Serv. Inst., 2, 453–88Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1861. On a model illustrating the parabolic theory of projection in vacuo, J. Roy. Unit. Serv. Inst., 5, 497–501Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1866a. Objects of the Roman period found near the old London wall, Archaeol. J., 24, 61–3Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1866b. Account of a human heart in a case found in Christ's Church, Cork, Archaeol. J., 24, 71–2Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1866c. On an ivory peg-top shaped object from Ireland, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 3, 395–6Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1866d. Discussion of F. W. Farrar's aptitude of races, Trans. Ethnol. Soc. London, 5, 123–6Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1867a. Roovesmore Fort, and stones inscribed with Oghams in the Parish of Aglish, County Cork, Archaeol. J., 24, 123–39Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1867b. A description of certain piles found near London Wall and Southwark, possibly the remains of pile buildings, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 5, lxxi-lxxxiiGoogle Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1867c. Primitive warfare, J. Roy. Unit. Serv. Inst., 11, 612–43Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1868a. Discussion following W. Rose's display of the Rose collection of stone implements, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 6, xlix–1Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1868b. Memoir on the hill forts of Sussex, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 4, 71Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1868c. An examination into the character and probable origin of the hill forts of Sussex, Archaeologia, 42, 27–52Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1868d. Primitive warfare III, J. Roy. Unit. Serv. Inst., 12, 399–439Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1869a. Flint implements, found associated with Roman remains in Oxfordshire, and the Isle of Thanet, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, new ser., 1, 1–12Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1869b. Primitive warfare III, J. Roy. Unit. Serv. Inst., 13, 509–39Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1869c. On the proposed exploration of Stonehenge by a committee of the British Association, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, new ser., 2, 1–5Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1869d. Distribution of cromlechs and megalithic monuments, being remarks on Mr Hodder Westropp's paper on the subject, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, new ser., 1, 59–67Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1870a. On a supposed Ogham inscription from Rus-Glas, County Cork, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, new ser., 2, 400–2Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1870b. Remarks on a XVII century matchlock from Inverness, Archaeol. J., 27, 134–5Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1872a. Address to the Dept. of Anthropology of the British Association at Brighton, Rep. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 157–74Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1872b. Address on the ‘Neolithic Exhibition’, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 5, 233–5Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1874a. Catalogue of the Anthropological Collection Lent by Colonel Lane Fox for exhibition in the Bellina I Green Branch of the South Kensington Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1874b. On the principles of classification adopted in the arrangement of his anthropological collection, now exhibited in the Bethnal Green Museum, J. Anthropol. Inst., 4, 293–308Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1875. The evolution of culture, J. Roy. Inst., 7, 357–89Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1887. Inaugural address to the annual meeting of the Archaeological Institute, held at Salisbury, Archaeol. J., 44, 261–77Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1888. Address as president of the Anthropological Section of the British Association Bath, Rep. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 825–35Google Scholar
Prestwich, J. 1859. On the occurrence of flint implements, associated with the remains of extinct mammalia, in undisturbed beds of the late geological period, Proc. Roy. Soc., 10, 50–9Google Scholar
Prichard, J. C. 1847. On the relations of ethnology to other branches of knowledge, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, 1, 301–29Google Scholar
Prichard, J. C. 1848. Anniversary address: On the recent progress of ethnology, J. Ethnol. Soc. London, 2, 119–49Google Scholar
Prideaux, T. S. 1864. On the principles of ethnology. Trans. Ethnol. Soc. London, 3, 408–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, R. 1860. Exhibit of photographs representing gun locks, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 1, 176Google Scholar
Radford, C. A. R. 1961. The Royal Charter, Archaeol. J., 118, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, H. J. 1936. History in the Open Air, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rawlinson, G. 1898. A Memoir of Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
Reed, C. 1861. Exhibition of some modern firearms, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2nd ser., 1, 361Google Scholar
Report of the Paris International Congress for Anthropology and Prehistoric Archaeology 1868. Archive für Anthropologie, 3, 351Google Scholar
Rose, W. 1868. The Rose collection of stone implements, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 6, xl-xlixGoogle Scholar
Rusi. Royal United Services Institution, 1851–69. Annual ReportsGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. and Russell, P. 1937. The Amberley Papers: Bertrand Russell's Family Background, 2 vols., New YorkGoogle Scholar
R.W., 1850. Introduction, Archaeol. J., 7, 1–7Google Scholar
Stanhope, P. H. (Lord Mahon) 1854. Presidential address. Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 3, 93–6Google Scholar
Steinhauer, E. T. 1862. Catalogue of a Collection of Ancient and Modem Stone Implements and Other Weapons, Toolsand Utensils of the Aborigines of Various Counties in the PossessionofHenry Christy, F.G.S., etc., LondonGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E. T. 1864. Descriptive Catalogue of the Salisbury and South Wilts. Museum, SalisburyGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E. T. 1867. Some Account of the Blackmore Museum Salisbury. LondonGoogle Scholar
Stevens, F. E. 1947. The Salisbury Museums, 1861–1947: A Record of Eighty-Six Years' Progress, SalisburyGoogle Scholar
Stocking, G. W. Jr 1971. What's in a name: the origins of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Man, new ser., 6, 369–90Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. Jr 1973. Introduction to J. C Prichard, Researches into the Physical History of Man, (1820) ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Stocking, G. W. Jr 1987. Victorian Anthropology, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Talbot De Malahide, J. 1851. Presidential address, Archaeol. J., 7, 209Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E. 1932. The humours of archaeology or the Canterbury Congress of 1844 and the early days of the Association J. Brit. Archaeol. Ass., new ser., 38, 183–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. W. 1960. The first Inspector of Ancient Monuments in the field, J. Brit. Archaeol. Soc., 3rd ser., 23, 103–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. W. 1977. General Pitt Rivers: Evolution and Archaeology in the Nineteenth Century, Bradford-on-AvonGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, T. 1937. The study of man, Amer. Scand. Rev., 25, 309–18Google Scholar
Thurman, J. 1864. On the two principal forms of ancient British and Gaulish skulls, Mem. Anthropol. Soc. London, 1, 120–68Google Scholar
Tomline, G. 1865. Inaugural address delivered at the Suffolk Congress held at Ipswich, J. Brit. Archaeol. Ass., 21, 1–5Google Scholar
Tonnochy, A. B. 1953. Department of British and Medieval Antiquities, Brit. Mus. Quart., 18, 83–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B. 1985. Writing the history of archaeology, in Objects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material Culture (ed. Stocking, G.), MadisonGoogle Scholar
Tylor, A. 1863. On the discoveries of supposed human remains in the tool-bearing drift of Moulin-Avignon, Trans. Anthropol. Soc. London, 1, i-iiiGoogle Scholar
Tylor, E. B. 1917, Pitt Rivers, Augustus Henry Lane Fox, Dictionary of National Biography, 22, 1140–2Google Scholar
Way, A. 1844. Introductory address, Archaeol. J., 1, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westropp, H. 1868. A few words on the origin and development of language, J. Anthropol. Soc. London, 7, xxxix-xlviGoogle Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1850a. On various drawings of Irish antiquities, Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, 2, 53Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1850b. On the peculiarities exhibited by the miniatures and ornamentation of ancient Irish illuminated MSS, Archaeol. J., 7, 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1850C. On Irish ornamentation, Archaeol. J., 7, 83–5Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1858. Archaeological notes of a tour in Denmark, Prussia and Holland, Archaeol. J., 16, 132–45, 236–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M. 1954. Archaeology from the Earth, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wilde, W. R. W. 1857–1863. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Museum of Antiquity of the Royal Irish Academy, 3 vols., DublinGoogle Scholar
Wilklns, J. 1961. Worsaae and British antiquities, Antiquity, 35, 214–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, B. 1949. Nineteenth-Century Studies, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, R. B. 1973, Alfred V. Kidder, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, L. L. 1923. The Development of the Sciences, New HavenGoogle Scholar
Woolley, L. 1953. Spadework in Archaeology, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Worsaae, J. J. A. 1846a. An account of the formation of the museum at Copenhagen and general remarks on the classification of antiquities found in the north and west of Europe. Proc. Roy. Inst. Ir., 3, 310–27Google Scholar
Worsaae, J. J. A. 1846b. Review of the different description of Danish and Irish antiquities and of several historical events connected with the invasion of Ireland by the Danes, Proc. Roy. Inst. Ir., 3, 327–44Google Scholar
Young, G. M. 1974. Victorian England: A Portrait of an Age, 2nd ed., OxfordGoogle Scholar