Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:47:12.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medieval Horned and Polled Sheep: The Archaeological and Iconographic Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Philip L. Armitage  and
John A. Goodall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The discovery of a large number of sheep bones at Baynard's Castle prompted a re-examination of the evidence for the appearance of the late medieval sheep. Previous studies have been based on a miscellaneous collection of depictions from various countries and media without attempting to distinguish which of them were copied from older pattern books. The sheep placed at the feet of woolmen on their brasses could not have been derived from existing patterns and their reliability as evidence for the appearance of the contemporary sheep was confirmed by comparing them with surviving bones. The present state of the evidence suggests that there were no marked regional variations in the sheep at this period; however, much more material needs to be examined but the methods used for this survey could be applied to other species.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 73 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 By the early nineteenth century the ownership of pedigree livestock had become fashionable among the landed gentry and the more prosperous farmers, and the breeding and showing of such animals was more of a ‘cult than a business’—Fraser, A., The Bull (Reading, 1972), pp. 125–9Google Scholar.

2 Platt, C., Rescue News, viii (Winter 1974), 11Google Scholar.

3 A. Down, Chichester Civic Society Excavations Committee, personal communication.

4 Cf.Anderson, M. D., Animal Carvings in British Churches (1938), pp. 9–11Google Scholar on the influence of Bestiary texts and misunderstood pictures.

5 Keyser, C. E., A List of Norman Tympana and Lintels (1927)Google Scholar; Remnant, G. L., A Catalogue of Misericords in Great Britain (1969)Google Scholar.

6 Agric. Hist. Rev. xii (1964), 76Google Scholar.

7 McCulloch, F., Mediaeval Latin and French Bestiaries (1962), p. 166Google Scholar [Univ. of North Carolina, Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures, 33].

8 Anderson, , op. cit., p. 46Google Scholar.

9 Bouchier, E. S., Notes on the Stained Glass of the Oxford District (1918), p. 62Google Scholar.

10 Twining, L., Symbols and Emblems of Early Christian and Mediaeval Christian Art (1885), pl. 10. 22Google Scholar.

11 , A. G. and Hassall, W. O., The Douce Apocalypse (1961), pis. 3–4Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., pls. 4, 5, and 10.

13 The Bestiary, pp. 14.ff.

14 Geist, V., Mountain Sheep (Chicago, 1971), pl. 46 and fig. 17Google Scholar.

15 ‘Monumental brasses–a new classification of military effigies’, J.B.A.A., 3rd ser., xii (1949), 70–97Google Scholar.

16 Royal MS. 12 F xiii; Harl. MS. 4751, f. 17b, and less certainly Royal 12 C xix.

17 Davies, C. T., The Monumental Brasses of Gloucestershire (1899, reptd. 1969), fig. 98Google Scholar.

18 Bath, B. H. Slicher van, The Agrarian History of Western Europe, A.D. 500–1850 (1967), p. 142Google Scholar.

19 Thirsk, J. (ed.), The Agrarian History of England and Wales, iv (1967), 210Google Scholar.

20 More, Thomas, Utopia (1516, tr. 1965 (Penguin Classics)), p. 46Google Scholar.

21 Yates, E. M., ‘Enclosure and the rise of grass land farming in Staffordshire’, North Staffordshire J. of Field Studies, xiv (1974), 57–8Google Scholar.

22 Allison, K. J., ‘Flock management in the sixteenth sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., xi (1958), 98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Anthony Fitzherbert, The Booke of Husbandrie (1523).

24 Trow-Smith, R., A History of British Livestock Husbandry to 1700 (1957), pp. 160–4Google Scholar.

25 Darwin, C., The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, ii (1905), p. 261Google Scholar.

26 Youatt, W., Sheep, their Breeds, Management and Diseases (1862), p. 312Google Scholar.

27 Youatt, , op. cit., p. 272Google Scholar.

28 Bewick, T., A General History of Quadrupeds (1790, reptd. 1970), pp. 60–1Google Scholar.

29 The drawing and description of the New Leicester ewe was based on these sources: Bingley, W., Memoirs of British Quadrupeds (1809), pp. 369–71Google Scholar; Donovan, E., The Natural History of British Quadrupeds, i (1820)Google Scholar; Youatt, , op. cit., pp. 109–13Google Scholar; and G. Garrard's model of a Fat Leicester Ewe (1810), British Museum (Natural History) Reg. No. ZD 1973. 1608.

30 All medieval depictions of sheep seem to be of white-faced animals. Certain illustrations of black-faced sheep do not appear until the seventeenth century;Ryder, , op. cit., p. 77Google Scholar. However, in some manuscripts they are coloured blue and white.

31 Fream's, W.Elements of Agriculture, 14th edn., [1962], pl. L (B)Google Scholar; and Lydekker, R., The Sheep and its Cousins (1912), pl. vi, fig. 2Google Scholar.

32 Ryder, M. L., Kirkstall Abbey Excavation, Seventh Report (1957), pl. v (a)Google Scholar.

33 Huxley, J. S., Problems of Relative Growth (1932), p. 223, fig. 96Google Scholar.

34 Cited inHuxley, , op. cit., pp. 88–9Google Scholar.

35 Hilzheimer, M., ‘Sheep’, Antiquity, x (1936), 198Google Scholar; and Lydekker, , op. cit., p. 57Google Scholar.

36 A few of these horned individuals are, however, unquestionably male, as exemplified by the rams carved on the chantry of Abbot Thomas Ramryge (d. 1521) at St. Albans cathedral.

37 Trow-Smith, , op. cit., p. 149Google Scholar.

38 Jewell, P. A., Milner, C., and Boyd, J. Morton, Island Survivors: The Ecology of the Soay Sheep of St. Kilda (1974), p. 98Google Scholar.

39 Ryder, , op. cit., pp. 48–9Google Scholar.

40 The statement by Ryder was later retracted and replaced by a more cautious interpretation: the skulls ‘could have been from horned rams and hornless ewes’, ‘The history of sheep breeds in Britain’, Agric. Hist. Rev. xii (1964), 73Google Scholar.

41 Sloane MS. 3544, f. 16b, a fourteenth-century MS.

42 Hatting, T, ‘The influence of castration on sheep horns’, in Clayson, A. T. (ed.), Archaeozoological Studies (Amsterdam, 1975), pp. 345–51Google Scholar.

43 The earlier ideas on horn inheritance in sheep were reviewed by Rae, A. L., ‘The genetics of sheep’, Advances in Genetics, viii (1956), 189–253Google Scholar; and the most recent work in this field has been summarized by Ryder, and Stephenson, , Wool Growth (1968), pp. 459–62Google Scholar.

44 Fraser, A. S., ‘Growth of Horns in Sheep’, Aust. J. Agric. Res. vi (1955), 770–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Ibsen, H. L., ‘Horn and scur inheritance in certain breeds of sheep’, Amer. Nat. lxxviii (1944), 506–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Details of horn development in castrated Soay sheep were supplied by Mr. Clark, A.R.C. Inst. Animal Physiol., Babraham, in a personal communication.

46 Cited byYouatt, , op. cit., p. 363Google Scholar.

47 Trow-Smith, , op. cit., pp. 153–7Google Scholar.

48 White, Gilbert, The Natural History and Antiquities of Selborne (1789, reptd. 1891), p. 401Google Scholar.