Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:52:26.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incubation capacity limits clutch size in south polar skuas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2009

Jeong-Hoon Kim*
Affiliation:
Division of Polar Biology and Oceanography, Korea Polar Research Institute, Songdo-dong 7-50, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, South Korea
Hyun Park
Affiliation:
Division of Polar Biology and Oceanography, Korea Polar Research Institute, Songdo-dong 7-50, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, South Korea
Eun Jung Choy
Affiliation:
Division of Polar Biology and Oceanography, Korea Polar Research Institute, Songdo-dong 7-50, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, South Korea
In-Young Ahn
Affiliation:
Division of Polar Biology and Oceanography, Korea Polar Research Institute, Songdo-dong 7-50, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-840, South Korea
Jeong-Chil Yoo
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Ornithology and Department of Biology, Kyung-Hee University, Seoul 130-701, South Korea

Abstract

The incubation-limitation hypothesis suggests that clutch size in some birds is limited by incubation capacity. However, this remains disputed amongst ornithologists. This study aimed to test whether incubation capacity limits the maximum clutch size to two eggs in south polar skuas (Catharacta maccormicki Saunders) by comparing the egg and nest temperatures as well as hatchability between two-egg and three-egg clutches. Although the vast majority of clutches contained one or two eggs, four naturally occurring three-egg clutches were found at Barton Peninsula, King George Island over three breeding seasons (2004–2005, 2005–2006 and 2006–2007). Regardless of clutch size, all incubating parents exhibited two discernible brood patches. The mean egg and nest temperatures of the three-egg clutches were significantly lower than were those of the two-egg clutches. The accumulated time that egg temperature decreased below 30°C in three-egg clutches was approximately eight times longer than that in two-egg clutches. The hatchability of natural one-egg (89.5%) and two-egg clutches (95.4%) were significantly higher than that of the three-egg clutches, which was zero. Our results suggest that the maximum clutch size in south polar skuas is probably restricted by incubation capacity.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, M. 1976. Clutch size in the long-tailed skua Stercorarius longicaudus: some field experiments. Ibis, 118, 586588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, T.W. 1999. What limits clutch size in waders? Journal of Avian Biology, 30, 216220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A.F. Dawson, W.R. 1979. Physiological responses of embryonic Heermann’s gulls to temperature. Physiological Zoology, 52, 413421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A.F., Dawson, W.R. Putnam, R.W.P. 1981. The thermal environment and tolerance of embryonic western gulls. Physiological Zoology, 54, 146154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, W.N. 1964. Polygyny and super-normal clutch size in the brown skua, Catharacta skua lonnbergi (Matthews). British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 3, 4147.Google Scholar
Booth, D.T. 1987. Effect of temperature on development of malleefowl Leipoa ocellata eggs. Physiological Zoology, 60, 437445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, M.R. 1983. Female-female pairings in Caspian terns. Condor, 55, 346349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, M.R., Miller, D.E. Hunt, G.L. Jr 1979. Female-female pairings and other unusual reproductive associations in ring-billed and California gulls. Auk, 96, 69.Google Scholar
Dawson, W.R. 1984. Metabolic responses of embryonic seabirds to temperature. In Whittow, G.C. & Rahn, H., eds. Seabird energetics. New York: Plenum Press, 139157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrand, S.M. Bryant, D.M. 2002. A trade-off between clutch size and incubation efficiency in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Functional Ecology, 16, 782791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridolfsson, A.K. Ellegren, H. 2000. Molecular evolution of the avian CHD1 genes in the Z and W sex chromosomes. Genetics, 155, 19031912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furness, R.W. 1987. The skuas. London: A. & C. Black, 363 pp.Google Scholar
Gabrielsen, G. Steen, J.B. 1979. Tachycardia during egg-hypothermia in incubating ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus). Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 107, 273277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, G.L. Jr Hunt, M.W. 1977. Female-female pairing in western gulls (Larus occidentalis) in Southern California. Science, 7, 14661467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulbert, S.T. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Nam, H.-K., Fulton, G.R. Yoo, J.-C. 2006. Egg retrieval as a source of nests with supernormal and mixed egg clutch in little terns Sterna albifrons. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology, 29, 545550.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Chung, H., Kim, J.H., Yoo, J.-C. Ahn, I.-Y. 2005. Nest distribution of skuas on Barton and Weaver peninsulas of King George Island, the Antarctic. Ocean and Polar Research, 27, 443450.Google Scholar
Kovacs, K.M. Ryder, J.P. 1983. Reproductive performance of female-female pairs and polygynous trios of ring-billed gulls. Auk, 100, 658669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, D. 1947. The significance of clutch size. Ibis, 89, 302352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, V.A., Lislevand, T. Byrkjedal, I. 2003. Is clutch size limited by incubation ability in northern lapwings? Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 784792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, C.D., Lambert, D.M., Bellamy, A.R., Stapleton, P.M. Young, E.C. 1992. Sex-specific restriction fragments and sex ratios revealed by DNA fingerprinting in the brown skua. Journal of Heredity, 83, 350355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niizuma, Y., Takagi, M., Senda, M., Chochi, M. Watanuki, Y. 2005. Incubation capacity limits maximum clutch size in black-tailed gulls Larus crassirostris. Journal of Avian Biology, 36, 421427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R.A. 2001. Stercorarius parasiticus Arctic skua. Birds of the Western Palearctic Update, 3, 2541.Google Scholar
Phillips, R.A. 2002. Trios of brown skuas at Bird Island, South Georgia: incidence and composition. Condor, 104, 694697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J.M., Monaghan, P. Ruxton, G.D. 2000. The consequences of clutch size for incubation conditions and hatching success in starlings. Functional Ecology, 14, 560565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandercock, B.K. 1997. Incubation capacity and clutch size determination in two calidrine sandpipers: a test of the four-egg threshold. Oecologia, 110, 5059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shugart, G.W. 1980. Frequency and distribution of polygyny in Great Lakes herring gulls in 1978. Condor, 82, 426429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Székely, T., Karsai, I. Williams, T.D. 1994. Determination of clutch-size in the Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis, 136, 341348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szentirmai, I., Székely, T. Liker, A. 2005. The influence of nest size on heat loss of penduline tit eggs. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 51, 5966.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.L., Monaghan, P. Furness, R.W. 1998. The demands of incubation and avian clutch size. Biological Reviews, 73, 293304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vleck, C.M. Kenagy, G.J. 1980. Embryonic metabolism of the fork-tailed storm petrel: physiological patterns during prolonged and interrupted incubation. Physiological Zoology, 53, 3242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vleck, C.M. Vleck, D. 1996. Embryonic energetics. In Carey, C., ed. Avian energetics and nutritional ecology. New York: Chapman & Hall, 550554.Google Scholar
Wallander, J. Andersson, M. 2002. Clutch size limitation in waders: experimental test in redshank Tringa totanus. Oecologia, 130, 391395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, D.R. 1987. Thermal tolerance of avian embryos: a review. The Condor, 98, 874898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, J.A. Baker, J.R. 1978. Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) embryonic development at different temperatures. Auk, 95, 569576.Google Scholar