Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:01:08.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—Geraki: Historical Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2013

Extract

In connection with the inscription from Geraki (No. 11) published above, and the parallel inscription from Mantinea, it seems worth while to discuss two obscure points. (1) The history ot Demetrius the Fair, the father of Antigonus Doson. (2) The worship of the earlier Diadochi.

Type
Laconia
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 112 note 1 Plut. Arat. c. 46 init.; Cleom. cc. 28–30; Polyb. iv. 34 ff.; cf. Droysen, , Gesch. d. Hellen. iii. 2, pp. 147155Google Scholar; Beloch, , Gr. Gesch. iii. I, p. 743Google Scholar; Niese, , Gesch. d. gr. u. mak. Staaten ii. PP. 332 ff.Google Scholar

page 112 note 2 Polyb. ii. 70 § 1.

page 112 note 3 So Beloch, l.c., supposes.

page 112 note 4 Polyb. iv. 24 § 6, where the league is called κοινὴ συμμαχὶα Antigonus reckoning himself one of the σύμμαχοι

page 112 note 5 Compare also Polybius iv. 34–36, and especially ix. 36 § 3, where in Lyciscus' speech to the Spartans on behalf of Macedonia (B.C. 107) the following words occur:—(᾿Αντίγονος) ἐ κβαλὼν τὸν τύραννον, καὶ τοὺς νόμους καὶ τὸ πάτριον ὑμῖν ἀποκατέστησε πολίτευμα, ἀνθ᾿ ὦν ὑμεῖς ἐν ταῖς κοιναῖς πανηγύρισι μάρτυρας ποιησάμενηι τοὺς ῾´Ελληνας εὐεργέτην ἑαυτῶν καὶ σωτῆρα τὸν1 ᾿Αντιγονον ἀνεκηρύξατε

page 112 note 6 Cf. Niese, , op. cit. ii. pp. 425 ff.Google Scholar

page 114 note 1 Droysen, , Gesch. d. Hellen, ii.2 p. 243Google Scholar; Niese, , Gesch. d. gr. u. mak. Staaten, i. p. 355.Google Scholar

page 114 note 2 v. Beloch, , op. cit. iii. 2, pp. 133Google Scholarseqq.; cf. Prott, von, Rhein. Museum, liii. p. 470.Google Scholar

page 114 note 3 Justinus with his usual carelessness writes Arsinoe instead of Apame.

page 115 note 1 Trogus, loc. cit.; Athenaeus, xiii. 563 b; Beloch, , op. cit. iii. 2, p. 131.Google Scholar

page 115 note 2 Catullus, lxvi. II.

page 116 note 1 Athenaeus, xii. 550.

page 116 note 2 Diodorus, xviii. 21.

page 116 note 3 Idem, xix 79.

page 116 note 4 Pausanias, i. 6. 5.

page 116 note 5 Justinus, xxii. 7.

page 116 note 6 i. 6. 8.

page 116 note 7 i. 6. 6.

page 116 note 8 Magas' revolt probably took place after the death of Ptolemy I.; Pausanias, i. 7. 1.

page 116 note 9 Beloch, , Gr. Geschichte, iii.2 pp. 424seqq.Google Scholar

page 117 note 1 Cf. Beloch, op. cit. pp. 426 seqq.

page 117 note 2 Eumenes of Pergamum does not take the title nor does he give it to his father by adoption, Philetaerus, in two Pergamene inscriptions, Dittenberger, , O.G.I. 266, 267.Google Scholar

page 117 note 3 Cf. J.H.S. 1905, p. 104.

page 117 note 4 Cf. his nickname Καλός v. Diogenes Laert. iv. 41.

page 117 note 5 Cf. Niese, op. cit. p. 134.

page 118 note 1 v. Lehmann, , Beitr. z. alt. Geschichte, iii. pp. 496seqq.Google Scholar

page 118 note 2 Beloch, op. cit. p. 92, suggests that the marriage of Phila with Antigonus Gonatas having taken place at the close of the war between him and Antiochus I., Demetrius was born about 276. Consequently he would have been about 18 in 258.

page 118 note 3 Trogus, Prol. xxvi.

page 118 note 4 Niese, op cit. p. 139.

page 118 note 5 It is worth remarking the frequency of the revolts of Cyrene against Ptolemaic rule. Besides those mentioned we know of two others (Polybius, x. 22. 2; Plutarch, Philopoemen 1, Aratus 5; and Polyaenus, viii. 70); further during the reign of Philometor it was independent under Euergetes II., and later from 117–96 it was ruled by Ptolemy Apion quite independent of Egypt.

page 119 note 1 Beloch, , op. cit. iii. 2, p. 432.Google Scholar

page 119 note 2 Idem, ibid. pp. 436 seqq.

page 119 note 3 Mahaffy, Emp. of Ptolemies, p. 306.

page 119 note 4 Maccabees, i. 10, 51.

page 119 note 5 Beiträge z. alt. Geschichte, i. p. 67.

page 119 note 6 v Kornemann, op. cit. p. 61, I.

page 120 note 1 Diodorus, xx. 46, 2.

page 120 note 2 Id. xx. 102, 3.

page 120 note 3 B.C.H. 1882, p. 143, 1886, p. 1022.

page 120 note 4 Plutarch, Aratus, 45.

page 120 note 5 Fränkel, Inschrift, v. Perg. 18; cf. Cardinali, Regno di Pergamo, pp. 139 seqq. esp. 156–158.

page 120 note 6 Id.op. cit. 43, 45, 59; Dittenberger, O.G.I. 289.

page 120 note 7 Fränkel, op. cit. 171.

page 120 note 8 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 308; Apollonis' death falls between 166 and 159. Eumenes is also called Soter in a Delphian inscription dating from soon after 167, Id.op. cit. 305.

page 120 note 9 xx. 100.

page 120 note 10 i. 8. 6.

page 120 note 11 Dittenberger, , Syll. i.2202.Google Scholar

page 120 note 12 Id.O.G.I. 16.

page 120 note 13 Id.O.G.I. 19, 22, 23, 25, 29; cf. Theocritus, x v. 47; evidence also from papyri, Kornemann, op. cit. p. 68, 2. The coins inscribed ΠΤΟΛΕΜΑΙΟYΣΩΤΗΡΟΣ were possibly not issued till after his death; but see Svoronos, Νομίσματα τοῦ Κράτους τῶν Πτολεμαίων p. 54.

page 120 note 14 Dittenberger, , O.G.I. 35, 3947.Google Scholar

page 120 note 15 Mahaffy, Revenue Laws, cols. I, 24.

page 120 note 16 She died in his fifteenth year 271–270.

page 121 note 1 Op. cit. pp. 70 seqq.

page 121 note 2 Rhein. Mus. liii. pp. 463 seqq.

page 121 note 3 Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyclopädie, Arsinoe, 26.

page 121 note 4 v. the references given by Wilcken loc. cit. which, owing to the inaccessibility of the books, it has been impossible to verify.

page 121 note 5 Schreiber, Stud. ii. Bild. Alexanders, p. 251; he takes it as the inscription of an altar set up by Ptolemy II. and Arsinoe to the Θεοὶ Σωτῆρες the Greek will hardly bear this translation. The use of βασιλέως may imply that Ptolemy was still alive.

page 121 note 6 Ptolemy IV. is called Soter, Dittenberger, O.G.I. 89.

page 121 note 7 B.M.Cat. Ptolemies, PI. VII.

page 121 note 8 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 64.

page 121 note 9 Loc. cit. p. 466.

page 121 note 10 Op. cit. p. 75.

page 122 note 1 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 212.

page 122 note 2 v. 255a.

page 122 note 3 Dittenberger, , Syll. 2 i. 250, 251.Google Scholar

page 122 note 4 Appian, Syr. 63; C.I.G. 4458 = Dittenberger O.G.I. 245; Dittenberger O.G.I. 233.

page 122 note 5 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 219.

page 122 note 6 Syr. 65; Dittenberger dates the Bargylia inscription (Syll. 2 i. 216) to Antiochus' lifetime merely because of this passage of Appian. The king's name is restored, and of the Soter the first half is wanting.

page 122 note 7 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 222.

page 122 note 8 Id.ibid. 229, 233, 245, 246.

page 122 note 9 B.M.Cat. Seleucids, Pl. III. 7.

page 122 note 10 Loc. cit.

page 122 note 11 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 229, 233, 245, 246.

page 123 note 1 Dittenberger, O.G.I. 233, 245, 246. In the Magnesia inscription (233) Seleucus III. though dead is still called Βασιλεύς perhaps he was not yet deified. The dead kings are simply called Σελεύκου Νικάτορος, Σελεύκου Καλλινίκου and so on, while the living king Antiochus III. and his son have the title Βασιλεύς

page 123 note 2 Cf. Niese, , op. cit. ii. pp. 71, 80.Google Scholar

page 123 note 3 Op. cit. p. 67.

page 123 note 4 Close relations existed between them; Dittenberger, O. G. I. 248.