Penrose's sib-pair papers (1935–1953) are discussed
in relation to recent applications. His essential
contribution that parental typing was an inefficient addition to sib-pair
data for linkage detection
remains. Parents now have even less to offer with contemporary markers
in the detection of linkage,
although not the enumeration of haplotypes. Attention is drawn to two little
known papers by
Penrose on multifactorial disease, and it is suggested that this term should
replace polygenic in
relation to family analyses. The convention established by Penrose, both
as author and editor, of raw
data being published alongside its analysis, which later fell into disuse
on grounds of sheer bulk, can
now be remedied by the Internet, and has been for the largest set of sib-pair
data on diabetes (Davies
et al. Nature371 (1994), 130–136). This is essential
if the contributions to the identity and location
of alleles possibly relevant to common disorders, none of which are likely
to be more than suggestive
in any single study, can be combined to assess consistency and joint evidence.
Attention is drawn to
a third little known paper by Penrose of high relevance to the strategy
of familial investigations in
multifactorial disorders. All five of the Penrose papers discussed here
can be viewed at
http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/anhumgen/