Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:26:53.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calendar Year Effects, Claims Inflation and the Chain-Ladder Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2011

D. Brydon  and
R. J. Verrall
R. J. Verrall
Affiliation:
Cass Business School, City University London, 106 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TZ. : Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the chain-ladder technique using the recently developed theory for age-period-cohort models. The theory was set out by Kuang et al. (2008a), and we believe that it has some significant implications for claims reserving and the chain-ladder technique. This paper applies the age-period-cohort model using the over-dispersed Poisson framework, and examines a number of experiments in order to understand better how the chain-ladder technique deals with calendar year effects. The conclusions from these investigations are that the basic chain-ladder technique may have some fundamental difficulties in many circumstances. We would therefore recommend that it should be used with caution, and that the data are examined in detail before any projections are made. This has particular importance in the context of solvency calculations since the chain-ladder technique can impose some specific patterns into the projections.

Keywords

Chain-Ladder TechniqueClaims ReservingSolvency
Type
Papers
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 287 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, G. & Zehnwirth, B. (2000). Best estimates for reserves. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXVII, 245–321.Google Scholar
England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J. (2002). Stochastic claims reserving in general insurance (with discussion). British Actuarial Journal, 8, 443–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A.R., Copeman, P.J., Gibson, E.R., Line, N.J.S., Lowe, J.A., Martin, P., Matthews, P.N. & Powell, D.S. (2006). A change agenda for reserving. Report of the general insurance reserving issues taskforce (GRIT). British Actuarial Journal, 12(III), 435–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuang, D., Nielsen, B. & Nielsen, J.P. (2008a). Identification of the age-period-cohort model and the extended chain-ladder model. Biometrika, 95, 979–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuang, D., Nielsen, B. & Nielsen, J.P. (2008b). Forecasting with the age-period-cohort model and the extended chain-ladder model. Biometrika, 95, 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, T. (1993). Distribution-free calculation of the standard error of chain-ladder reserve estimates. ASTIN Bulletin, 23, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshaw, A.E. & Verrall, R.J. (1998). A stochastic model underlying the chain ladder technique. British Actuarial Journal, 4(IV), 903–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.C. (1977). Separation of inflation and other effects from the distribution of non-life insurance claim delays. ASTIN Bulletin, 9, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.C. (2000). Loss reserving: an Actuarial perspective. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, H.G. (1972). An approach to the analysis of claims experience in motor liability excess-of-loss reinsurance. ASTIN Bulletin, 6, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuthrich, M.V. & Merz, M. (2008). Stochastic claims reserving methods in insurance. Wiley.Google Scholar