Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:00:04.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters for lameness, mastitis and dagginess in a multi-breed sheep population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

A. C. O’Brien ,
N. McHugh ,
E. Wall ,
T. Pabiou ,
K. McDermott ,
S. Randles ,
S. Fair  and
D. P. Berry
A. C. O’Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Biosciences, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy P61 P302, Co. Cork, Ireland Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
N. McHugh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Biosciences, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy P61 P302, Co. Cork, Ireland
E. Wall
Affiliation:
Sheep Ireland, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon P72 X050, Co. Cork, Ireland
T. Pabiou
Affiliation:
Sheep Ireland, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon P72 X050, Co. Cork, Ireland
K. McDermott
Affiliation:
Sheep Ireland, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon P72 X050, Co. Cork, Ireland
S. Randles
Affiliation:
Sheep Ireland, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon P72 X050, Co. Cork, Ireland
S. Fair
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
D. P. Berry*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Biosciences, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy P61 P302, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to quantify the extent of genetic variation in three health-related traits namely dagginess, lameness and mastitis, in an Irish sheep population. Each of the health traits investigated pose substantial welfare implications as well as considerable economic costs to producers. Data were also available on four body-related traits, namely body condition score (BCS), live weight, muscle depth and fat depth. Animals were categorised as lambs (<365 days old) or ewes (⩾365 days old) and were analysed both separately and combined. After edits, 39 315 records from 264 flocks between the years 2009 and 2015 inclusive were analysed. Variance components were estimated using animal linear mixed models. Fixed effects included contemporary group, represented as a three-way interaction between flock, date of inspection and animal type (i.e. lamb, yearling ewe (i.e. females ⩾365 days but <730 days old that have not yet had a recorded lambing) or ewe), animal breed proportion, coefficients of heterosis and recombination, animal gender (lambs only), animal parity (ewes only; lambs were assigned a separate ‘parity’) and the difference in age of the animal from the median of the respective parity/age group. An additive genetic effect and residual effect were both fitted as random terms with maternal genetic and non-genetic components also considered for traits of the lambs. The direct heritability of dagginess was similar across age groups (0.14 to 0.15), whereas the direct heritability of lameness ranged from 0.06 (ewes) to 0.12 (lambs). The direct heritability of mastitis was 0.04. For dagginess, 13% of the phenotypic variation was explained by dam litter, whereas the maternal heritability of dagginess was 0.05. The genetic correlation between ewe and lamb dagginess was 0.38; the correlation between ewe and lamb lameness was close to zero but was associated with a large standard error. Direct genetic correlations were evident between dagginess and BCS in ewes and between lameness and BCS in lambs. The present study has demonstrated that ample genetic variation exists for all three health traits investigated indicating that genetic improvement is indeed possible.

Keywords

lambewehealthheritabilitycorrelation
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 911 - 919
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Wool Innovation Limited (AWI) 2007. ‘Visual Breech Scores Guide’ developed by Australian Wool Innovation Limited (AWI) and Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA). Retrieved on 31 March 2016 from www.wool.com.au/publications.Google Scholar
Barillet, F, Rupp, R, Migon-Gasteau, S, Astruc, JM and Jacquin, M 2001. Genetic analysis for mastitis resistance and milk somatic cell score in French Lacaune dairy sheep. Genetic Selection and Evolution 33, 397–415.Google Scholar
Bergonier, D, De Cremoux, R, Rupp, R, Lagriffol, G and Berthelot, X 2003. Mastitis of dairy small ruminants. Veterinary Research 34, 689.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Bermingham, ML, Good, M and More, SJ 2011. Genetics of animal health and disease in cattle. Irish Veterinary Journal 64, 5.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Lee, JM, Macdonald, KA, Stafford, K, Matthews, L and Roche, JR 2007. Associations among body condition score, body weight, somatic cell count and clinical mastitis in seasonally calving dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90, 637–648.Google Scholar
Bisdorff, B and Wall, R 2008. Sheep blowfly strike risk and management in Great Britain: a survey of current practice. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 22, 303–308.Google Scholar
Bishop, SC and Morris, CA 2007. Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 70, 48–59.Google Scholar
Byrne, TJ, Ludemann, CI, Amer, PR and Young, MJ 2012. Broadening breeding objectives for maternal and terminal sheep. Livestock Science 144, 20–36.Google Scholar
Conington, J, Cao, G, Stott, A and Bünger, L 2008. Breeding for resistance to mastitis in United Kingdom sheep, a review and economic appraisal. Veterinary Record 162, 369–376.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J, Scott, M and Nolan, A 2006. Assessment of pain and welfare in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 62, 55–61.Google Scholar
Gilmour, AR, Gogel, BJ, Cullis, BR and Thompson, R 2009. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Accessed on 9th December 2015.Google Scholar
Greeff, JC, Karlsson, LJE and Schlink, AC 2014. Identifying indicator traits for breech strike in Merino sheep in a Mediterranean environment. Animal Production Science 54, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickford, JGH, Davies, S, Zhou, H and Gudex, BW 2005. A survey of the control and financial impact of footrot in the New Zealand Merino industry. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 65, 117–122.Google Scholar
Jefferies, BC. 1961. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.Google Scholar
Kaler, J and Green, LE 2008. Naming and recognition of six foot lesions of sheep using written and pictorial information: a study of 809 English sheep farmers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83, 52–64.Google Scholar
Martins, RFS, do Prado Paim, T, de Abreu Cardoso, C, Stéfano Lima Dallago, B, de Melo, CB, Louvandini, H and McManus, C 2012. Mastitis detection in sheep by infrared tomography. Research in Veterinary Science 94, 722–724.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, GJ and Bishop, SC 2005. Costs of the major endemic diseases of sheep in Great Britain and the potential benefits of reduction in disease impact. Animal Science 81, 23–29.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, GJ, Conington, J, Bünger, L, Haresign, W and Bishop, SC 2008. Genetic and phenotypic aspects of foot lesion scores in sheep or different breeds and ages. Animal 2, 1289–1296.Google Scholar
Pickering, NK, Dodds, KG, Blair, HT, Hickson, RE, Johnson, PL and McEwan, JC 2011. Genetic parameters for production traits in New Zealand dual-purpose sheep with an emphasis on dagginess. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1411–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, NK, Dodds, KG, Blair, HT, Hickson, RE, Johnson, PL and McEwan, JC 2012. Brief communication: estimates of genetic parameters for flystrike in New Zealand Romney and Romney cross sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 72, 189–191.Google Scholar
Polat, B, Colak, A, Cengiz, M, Yanmaz, LE, Oral, H, Bastan, A, Kaya, S and Hayirli, A 2010. Sensitivity and specificity of infrared thermography in detection of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3525–3532.Google Scholar
Pollot, GE, Karlsson, LJE, Eady, S and Greeff, JC 2004. Genetic parameters for indicators of host resistance to parasites from weaning to hogget age in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2852–2864.Google Scholar
Raadsma, HW, Egerton, JR, Wood, D, Kristo, C and Nicholas, FW 1994. Disease resistance in Merino sheep III. Genetic variation in resistance to footrot following challenge and subsequent vaccination with a homologous rDNA pilus vaccine under both induced and natural conditions. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 111, 367–390.Google Scholar
Scholtz, AJ, Cloete, SWP, Cloete, JJE, Kruger, ACM, van Wyk, JB and van der Linde, TCdeK 2012. Divergent selection for reproduction affects dag score, breech wrinkle score and crutching time in Mernios. South African Journal of Animal Science 42, 274–279.Google Scholar
Scobie, DR, O’Connell, D, Morris, CA and Hickey, SM 2008. Dag score is negatively correlated with breech bareness score of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 999–1003.Google Scholar
Serrano, M, Perez-Guzman, MD, Montoro, V and Jurado, JJ 2003. Genetic analysis of somatic cell score and other milk traits in several lactations of Manchega ewes. Mean lactation. Retrieved on 1 April 2016 from http://om.iamm.fr/om/pdf/a55/03600064.pdf.Google Scholar
Skerman, TM, Johnson, DL, Kane, DW and Clarke, JN 1988. Clinical footscald and footrot in a New Zealand Romney Flock: phenotypic and genetic parameters. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 907–916.Google Scholar
Talukder, S, Gabai, G and Celi, P 2015. The use of infrared thermography and measurement of oxidative stress biomarkers as tools to diagnose foot lesions in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 127, 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waage, S and Vatn, S 2008. Individual animal risk factors for clinical mastitis in meat sheep in Norway. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 87, 229–243.Google Scholar