Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:31:54.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of sex and dietary lysine on performances and serum and meat traits in finisher pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2015

J. Suárez-Belloch ,
J. A. Guada  and
M. A. Latorre
J. Suárez-Belloch
Affiliation:
IUCA. Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos. Facultad de Veterinaria. Universidad de Zaragoza. C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
J. A. Guada
Affiliation:
IUCA. Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos. Facultad de Veterinaria. Universidad de Zaragoza. C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
M. A. Latorre*
Affiliation:
IUCA. Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos. Facultad de Veterinaria. Universidad de Zaragoza. C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A total of 160 Duroc×(Landrace×Large White) pigs, 50% barrows and 50% gilts, of 28.3±4.52 kg of BW were used to study the effect of lysine (Lys) restriction in the finisher period, on growth performances and serum and carcass and meat quality traits. The grower diet (from 30 to 90 kg BW) was slightly Lys-restricted (7.8 g standardised ileal digestible (SID) Lys/kg) in accordance with results from a previous trial. During the finisher period (90 to 130 kg BW), four experimental diets with decreasing SID Lys contents (6.3, 5.6, 4.2 and 3.2 g/kg) were tested. Each of the eight treatments (two sexes×four levels of Lys) was replicated five times. Each replicate was a pen with four pigs allocated together. When animals achieved 129±2.59 kg were slaughtered and carcass and meat characteristics were evaluated. No significant interaction sex×diet was found. During the finisher period, barrows grew faster (P<0.001) and ate more feed (P<0.001) but tended to be less efficient (P=0.055) than gilts. The Lys restriction affected linearly (P<0.001) all productive performance traits; daily BW gain and feed intake decreased and feed conversion ratio increased. Also, the concentration of serum urea at slaughter tended to be higher in barrows than in gilts (P=0.065) and was reduced quadratically by the restriction of Lys in feed (P<0.001). Carcasses from barrows had higher backfat thickness (P<0.01) and lower weight of main trimmed lean cuts (ham+shoulder+loin; P<0.05) than those from gilts. The Lys restriction during the finisher period decreased carcass yield (quadratic; P<0.001) and the weight of major cuts (linear; P<0.001). Sex and diet had limited effect on meat characteristics; the Lys restriction decreased quadratically the proportion of protein (P<0.01) and increased linearly the intramuscular fat (IMF) content (P<0.001). We can conclude that dietary Lys restriction during finisher period in pigs impaired growth performances and was not successful to increase the carcass fat deposition, although it could have positive effects on IMF proportion of pork.

Keywords

growth performanceslysine restrictionmeat qualitypigssex
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 10 , October 2015 , pp. 1731 - 1739
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Bidner, BS, Ellis, M, Witte, DP, Carr, CN and McKeith, FK 2004. Influence of dietary lysine level, pre-slaughter fasting, and rendement napole genotype on fresh pork quality. Meat Science 68, 53–60.Google Scholar
Bligh, EG and Dyer, WJ 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Chemistry 37, 911–917.Google Scholar
Boletín Oficial del Estado 1979. Orden de 31 de julio de 1979 por la que se establecen métodos oficiales de análisis de aceites y grasas, productos cárnicos, cereales y derivados, fertilizantes, productos fitosanitarios, productos lácteos, piensos, aguas y productos derivados de la uva. BOE 27, 20221–20346.Google Scholar
Boletin Oficial del Estado 2007. Ley 32/2007 de 7 de Noviembre para el cuidado de los animales, en su explotación, transporte, experimentación y sacrificio. BOE 268, 45914–45920.Google Scholar
Cameron, ND 1990. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for fatty acid composition on subcutaneous fat, meat quality, carcass composition and eating quality traits in pigs. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, July 23–27, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, pp. 549–552.Google Scholar
Cameron, ND, McCullough, E, Troup, K and Penman, JC 2003. Serum urea concentration as a predictor of dietary lysine requirement in selected lines of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 91–100.Google Scholar
Campbell, RG, Taverner, MR and Curie, MD 1988. Effect of feeding level and dietary protein content on the growth, body composition, and rate of protein deposition in pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg. Animal Production 38, 233–240.Google Scholar
Cisneros, F, Ellis, M, McKeith, FK, McCaw, J and Fernando, RL 1996. Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics, commercial cutting and curing yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts from two genotypes. Journal of Animal Science 74, 925–933.Google Scholar
Daza, A, Latorre, MA and López-Bote, CJ 2010. The use of barley as single ingredient in the diet provided during the finishing period may improve the meat quality of heavy pigs from PO Teruel ham (Spain). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 607–616.Google Scholar
Deng, D, Li, AK, Chu, WY, Huang, RL, Li, TJ, Kong, XF, Liu, ZJ, Wu, GY and Zhang, YM 2007. Growth performance and metabolic responses in barrows fed low-protein diets supplemented with essential amino acids. Livestock Science 109, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, M, Webb, AJ, Avery, PJ and Brown, I 1996. The influence of terminal sire genotype, sex, slaughter weight, feeding regime and slaughter-house on growth performance and carcass and meat quality in pigs and on the organoleptic properties of fresh pork. Animal Science 62, 521–530.Google Scholar
Fabian, J, Chiba, LI, Kuhlers, DL, Frobish, LT, Nadarajah, K, Perth, CR, McElhenney, WH and Lewis, AJ 2002. Degree of amino acid restrictions during the grower phase and compensatory growth in pigs selected for lean growth efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2610–2618.Google ScholarPubMed
Friesen, KG, Nelssen, JL, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Unruh, JA, Kropf, DH and Kerr, BJ 1994. Influence of dietary lysine on growth and carcass composition of high-lean-growth gilts fed from 34 to 72 kilograms. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1761–1770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal 2010. Normas FEDNA para la formulación de piensos compuestos. FEDNA, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Guo, X, Tang, R, Wang, W, Liu, D and Wang, K 2011. Effects of dietary protein/carbohydrate ratio on fat deposition and gene expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ and heart fatty acid-binding. Livestock Science 140, 111–116.Google Scholar
Hahn, JD, Biehl, RR and Baker, DH 1995. Ideal digestibility lysine level for early- and late-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 73, 773–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huff-Lonergan, E, Bass, TJ, Malek, M, Dekkers, JCM, Prusa, K and Rothschild, MF 2002. Correlations among selected pork quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 80, 617–627.Google Scholar
Jenkins, TC 2010. Technical note: common analytical errors yielding inaccurate results during analysis of fatty acids in feed and digesta samples. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1170–1174.Google Scholar
Jin, YH, Oh, HK, Piao, LG, Jang, SK, Choi, YH, Heo, PS, Jang, YD and Kim, YY 2010. Effect of dietary lysine restriction and energy density on performance, nutrient digestibility and meat quality in finishing pigs. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 23, 1213–1220.Google Scholar
Latorre, MA, Ripoll, G, García-Belenguer, E and Ariño, L 2009. The increase of slaughter weight of gilts as strategy to optimize de production of Spanish high quality dry-cured hams. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1464–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebret, B 2008. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs. Animal 2, 1548–1558.Google Scholar
Loughmiller, JA, Nelssen, JL, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Titgemeyer, EC and Kim, IH 1998. Influence of dietary total sulfur amino acids and methionine on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing gilts. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2129–2137.Google Scholar
Madeira, MS, Costa, P, Alfaia, CM, Lopes, PA, RJB, Bessa, JPC, Lemos and JAM, Prates 2013. The increased intramuscular fat promoted by dietary restriction in lean but not in fatty pig genotypes improves pork sensory attributes. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3177–3187.Google Scholar
Mas, G, Llavall, M, Coll, D, Roca, R, Díaz, I, Gispert, M, Oliver, MA and Realini, CE 2010. Carcass and meat quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of tissues from Pietrain-crossbred barrows and gilts fed an elevated monounsatured fat diet. Meat Science 85, 707–714.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase treated neutral detergent fibre in feeds with refluxing beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 85, 1217–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Sanchez, JA, Sanz, MA, Blanco, M, Serrano, MP, Joy, M, Latorre, MA 2011. The influence of dietary lysine restriction during the finishing period on growth performance and carcass, meat, and fat characteristics of barrows and gilts intended for dry-cured ham production. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3651–3662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, ML, Donsbough, AL, Waguespack, AM, Powell, S, Bidner, TD, Payne, RL and Southern, LL 2011. Maximizing the use of supplemental amino acids in corn-soybean meal diets for 20-to 45-kilogram pigs. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2415–2424.Google Scholar
Ruíz, J, García, C, Muriel, E, Andrés, AI and Ventanas, J 2002. Influence on sensory characteristics on the acceptability of dry-cured ham. Meat Science 61, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suárez-Belloch, J, Guada, JA and Latorre, MA 2015. The effect of lysine restriction during grower period on productive performance, serum metabolites and fatness of heavy barrows and gilts. Livestock Science 171, 36–43.Google Scholar
Tous, N, Lizardo, R, Vilà, B, Gispert, M, Font-i-Furnols, M and Esteve-Garcia, E 2014. Effect of reducing dietary protein and lysine on growth performance, carcass characteristics, intramuscular fat, and fatty acid profile of finishing barrows. Journal of Animal Science 92, 129–140.Google Scholar
Warnants, N, Van Oeckel, MJ and Boucque, CV 1999. Incorporation of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids into pork fatty tissues. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2478–2490.Google Scholar
Witte, DP, Ellis, M, McKeith, FK and Wilson, ER 2000. Effect of dietary lysine level and environmental temperature during the finishing phase on the intramuscular fat content of pork. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1272–1276.Google Scholar
Wood, JD, Enser, M, Fisher, AV, Nute, GR, Sheard, PR, Richardson, RI, Hughes, SI and Whittington, FM 2008. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: a review. Meat Science 78, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed