Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T07:35:11.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between- and within-herd variation in blood and milk biomarkers in Holstein cows in early lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2019

M. A. Krogh Open the ORCID record for M. A. Krogh [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Hostens Open the ORCID record for M. Hostens [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Salavati Open the ORCID record for M. Salavati [Opens in a new window] ,
C. Grelet Open the ORCID record for C. Grelet [Opens in a new window] ,
M. T. Sorensen ,
D. C. Wathes Open the ORCID record for D. C. Wathes [Opens in a new window] ,
C. P. Ferris Open the ORCID record for C. P. Ferris [Opens in a new window] ,
C. Marchitelli Open the ORCID record for C. Marchitelli [Opens in a new window] ,
F. Signorelli  and
F. Napolitano
...Show all authors
M. A. Krogh*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, TjeleDK8830, Denmark
M. Hostens
Affiliation:
Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
M. Salavati
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, United Kingdom
C. Grelet
Affiliation:
Valorization of Agricultural Products Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
M. T. Sorensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, TjeleDK8830, Denmark
D. C. Wathes
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, United Kingdom
C. P. Ferris
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Largepark, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
C. Marchitelli
Affiliation:
Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Via Salaria 31, 00015 Monterotondo, Roma, Italy
F. Signorelli
Affiliation:
Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Via Salaria 31, 00015 Monterotondo, Roma, Italy
F. Napolitano
Affiliation:
Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Via Salaria 31, 00015 Monterotondo, Roma, Italy
F. Becker
Affiliation:
Institute for Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
T. Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, TjeleDK8830, Denmark
E. Matthews
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Veterinary Science Centre Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
F. Carter
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Veterinary Science Centre Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
A. Vanlierde
Affiliation:
Valorization of Agricultural Products Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
G. Opsomer
Affiliation:
Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
N. Gengler
Affiliation:
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
F. Dehareng
Affiliation:
Valorization of Agricultural Products Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
M. A. Crowe
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Veterinary Science Centre Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
K. L. Ingvartsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, TjeleDK8830, Denmark
L. Foldager
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, TjeleDK8830, Denmark Bioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 8, Aarhus DK8000, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Both blood- and milk-based biomarkers have been analysed for decades in research settings, although often only in one herd, and without focus on the variation in the biomarkers that are specifically related to herd or diet. Biomarkers can be used to detect physiological imbalance and disease risk and may have a role in precision livestock farming (PLF). For use in PLF, it is important to quantify normal variation in specific biomarkers and the source of this variation. The objective of this study was to estimate the between- and within-herd variation in a number of blood metabolites (β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), non-esterified fatty acids, glucose and serum IGF-1), milk metabolites (free glucose, glucose-6-phosphate, urea, isocitrate, BHB and uric acid), milk enzymes (lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase)) and composite indicators for metabolic imbalances (Physiological Imbalance-index and energy balance), to help facilitate their adoption within PLF. Blood and milk were sampled from 234 Holstein dairy cows from 6 experimental herds, each in a different European country, and offered a total of 10 different diets. Blood was sampled on 2 occasions at approximately 14 days-in-milk (DIM) and 35 DIM. Milk samples were collected twice weekly (in total 2750 samples) from DIM 1 to 50. Multilevel random regression models were used to estimate the variance components and to calculate the intraclass correlations (ICCs). The ICCs for the milk metabolites, when adjusted for parity and DIM at sampling, demonstrated that between 12% (glucose-6-phosphate) and 46% (urea) of the variation in the metabolites’ levels could be associated with the herd-diet combination. Intraclass Correlations related to the herd-diet combination were generally higher for blood metabolites, from 17% (cholesterol) to approximately 46% (BHB and urea). The high ICCs for urea suggest that this biomarker can be used for monitoring on herd level. The low variance within cow for NAGase indicates that few samples would be needed to describe the status and potentially a general reference value could be used. The low ICC for most of the biomarkers and larger within cow variation emphasises that multiple samples would be needed - most likely on the individual cows - for making the biomarkers useful for monitoring. The majority of biomarkers were influenced by parity and DIM which indicate that these should be accounted for if the biomarker should be used for monitoring.

Keywords

dairybiomarkerphysiological imbalancevariancemonitoring
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , May 2020 , pp. 1067 - 1075
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Present address: Genetics and Genomics Division, The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.

References

Åkerstedt, M, Forsbäck, L, Larsen, T and Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2011. Natural variation in biomarkers indicating mastitis in healthy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 78, 88–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, L 1984. Concentrations of blood and milk ketone bodies, blood isopropanol and plasma glucose in dairy cows in relation to the degree of hyperketonaemia and clinical signs. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe A, 31, 683–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annison, EF 1983. Metabolite utilization by the ruminant mammary gland. In Biochemistry of lactation (ed. Mepham, TB), pp. 399–436. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Beltman, ME, Forde, N, Furney, P, Carter, F, Roche, JF, Lonergan, P and Crowe, MA 2010. Characterisation of endometrial gene expression and metabolic parameters in beef heifers yielding viable or non-viable embryos on day 7 after insemination. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 22, 987–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berckmans, D 2017. General introduction to precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers 7, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, DP, Horan, B, O’Donovan, M, Buckley, F, Kennedy, E, McEvoy, M and Dillon, P 2007. Genetics of grass dry matter intake, energy balance, and digestibility in grazing Irish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4835–4845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjerre-Harpoth, V, Storm, AC, Vestergaard, M, Larsen, M and Larsen, T 2016. Effect of postpartum propylene glycol allocation to over-conditioned Holstein cows on concentrations of milk metabolites. The Journal of Dairy Research 83, 156–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, DJ, Barton, BA, Anderson, GW, Smith, RD 1988. Influence of protein intake and feeding strategy on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 3470–3481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagas, LM, Bass, JJ, Blache, D, Burke, CR, Kay, JK, Lindsay, DR, Lucy, MC, Martin, GB, Meier, S, Rhodes, FM, Roche, JR, Thatcher, WW and Webb, R 2007. Invited review: new perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4022–4032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grelet, C, Fernández Pierna, JA, Dardenne, P, Soyeurt, H, Vanlierde, A, Colinet, F, Gengler, N, Baeten, V and Dehareng, F 2016. Development of Fourier transform mid-infrared calibrations to predict acetone, β-hydroxybutyrate and citrate contents in bovine milk through a European dairy network. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 4816–4825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, AH and Palmquist, DL 1993. Diurnal variation of rumen ammonia, serum urea, and milk urea in dairy cows at high and low yields. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 475–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huzzey, JM, Nydam, DV, Grant, RJ and Overton, TR 2012. The effects of overstocking Holstein dairy cattle during the dry period on cortisol secretion and energy metabolism. Journal Dairy Science 95, 4421–4433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingvartsen, KL 2006. Feeding- and management-related diseases in the transition cow: physiological adaptations around calving and strategies to reduce feeding-related diseases. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 175–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvartsen, KL and Moyes, K 2013. Nutrition, immune function and health of dairy cattle. Animal 7, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, AL, Petersen, MB and Houe, H 1993. Determination of the fructosamine concentration in bovine serum samples. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A 40, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T 2005. Determination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in milk by a fluorometric assay. The Journal of Dairy Research 72, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T 2014. Fluorometric determination of free and total isocitrate in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7498–7504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T 2015. Fluorometric determination of free glucose and glucose 6-phosphate in cows’ milk and other opaque matrices. Food Chemistry 166, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T and Moyes, KM 2010. Fluorometric determination of uric acid in bovine milk. The Journal of Dairy Research 77, 438–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T and Moyes, KM 2015. Are free glucose and glucose-6-phosphate in milk indicators of specific physiological states in the cow? Animal 9, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T and Nielsen, NI 2005. Fluorometric determination of b-hydroxybutyrate in milk and blood plasma. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2004–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, T, Rontved, CM, Ingvartsen, KL, Vels, L and Bjerring, M 2010. Enzyme activity and acute phase proteins in milk utilized as indicators of acute clinical E. coli LPS-induced mastitis. Animal 4, 1672–1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mair, B, Drillich, M, Klein-Jöbstl, D, Kanz, P, Borchardt, S, Meyer, L, Schwendenwein, I and Iwersen, M 2016. Glucose concentration in capillary blood of dairy cows obtained by a minimally invasive lancet technique and determined with three different hand-held devices. BMC Veterinary Research 12, 34. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0662-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, K, Decuypere, E, De Baerdemaeker, J and De Ketelaere, B 2011. Statistical control charts as a support tool for the management of livestock production. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(3), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyes, KM, Bendixen, E, Codrea, MC and Ingvartsen, KL 2013. Identification of hepatic biomarkers for physiological imbalance of dairy cows in early and mid lactation using proteomic technology. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3599–3610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council ( NRC) 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, volume 1, 7th edition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nielsen, NI, Ingvartsen, KL and Larsen, T 2003. Diurnal variation and the effect of feed restriction on plasma and milk metabolites in TMR-fed dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A 50, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, NI, Larsen, T, Bjerring, M and Ingvartsen, KL 2005. Quarter health, milking interval, and sampling time during milking affect the concentration of milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 3186–3200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Leary-Kelly, SW and Vokurka, RJ 1998. The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management 16, 387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ospina, PA, Nydam, DV, Stokol, T and Overton, TR 2010. Evaluation of nonesterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate in transition dairy cattle in the northeastern United States: critical thresholds for prediction of clinical diseases. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 546–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiroz-Rocha, GF, LeBlanc, SJ, Duffield, TF, Jefferson, B, Wood, D, Leslie, KE and Jacobs, RM 2010. Short communication: effect of sampling time relative to the first daily feeding on interpretation of serum fatty acid and β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2030–2033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Seifi, HA, LeBlanc, SJ, Leslie, KE and Duffield, T 2011. Metabolic predictors of post-partum disease and culling risk in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Journal 188, 216–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stengärde, L, Holtenius, K, Tråvén, M, Hultgren, J, Niskanen, R and Emanuelson, U 2010. Blood profiles in dairy cows with displaced abomasum. Journal of dairy science 93, 4691–4699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wathes, DC, Cheng, Z, Bourne, N, Taylor, VJ, Coffey, MP and Brotherstone, S 2007. Differences between primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in the inter-relationships between metabolic traits, milk yield and body condition score in the periparturient period. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 33, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Krogh et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S10 and Tables S1-S5

Download Krogh et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.9 MB