Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T07:59:27.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing livestock using animal behavior: mixed-species stocking and flerds*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2012

D. M. Anderson ,
E. L. Fredrickson  and
R. E. Estell
D. M. Anderson*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS-Jornada Experimental Range, P.O. Box 30003 MSC 3JER, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
E. L. Fredrickson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475, USA
R. E. Estell
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS-Jornada Experimental Range, P.O. Box 30003 MSC 3JER, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Mixed-species stocking can foster sound landscape management while offering economic and ecological advantages compared with mono-species stocking. Producers contemplating a mixed-species enterprise should reflect on several considerations before implementing this animal management strategy. Factors applicable to a particular producer's landscape must be considered together with goals and economic constraints before implementing mixed-species stocking. A major consideration when using mixed-species stocking is how to deal with predation losses, especially among small ruminants. An approach being adopted in some commercial operations capitalizes on using innate animal behaviors to form cohesive groups of two or more livestock species that consistently remain together under free-ranging conditions. These groups are referred to as flerds. The mixing of a flock of sheep and/or goats with a herd of cattle into a flerd has been shown to protect sheep and goats from coyote predation, as well as offering other husbandry advantages. Some of the added advantages include more efficient conversion of forage into animal protein. Creation of flerds, their maintenance and advantages are discussed.

Keywords

livestockbondingpredationanimal behavior
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 8 , August 2012 , pp. 1339 - 1349
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Mention of a trade name does not constitute a guarantee, endorsement, or warranty of the product by the USDA-ARS or New Mexico State University over other products not mentioned.

References

Abaye, AO, Allen, VG, Fontenot, JP 1994. Influence of grazing cattle and sheep together and separately on animal performance and forage quality. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1013–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abaye, AO, Allen, VG, Fontenot, JP 1997. Grazing sheep and cattle together or separately: effect on soils and plants. Agronomy Journal 89, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, N 1975. Sheep and cattle grazing in forests: a review. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aich, A Waterhouse, A 1999. Small ruminants in environmental conservation. Small Ruminant Research 34, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcaide, EM, García, MA, Aguilera, JF 1997. The voluntary intake and rumen digestion by grazing goats and sheep of a low-quality pasture from a semi-arid land. Livestock Production Science 52, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, VG (Chair) 1991. Terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. The forage and grazing terminology committee. Pocahontas Press, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Allen, VG, Batello, C, Berretta, EJ, Hodgson, J, Kothmann, M, Li, X, Mclvor, J, Milne, J, Morros C Peeters, A, Sanderson, M 2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM 1998. Pro-active livestock management – capitalizing on animal behavior. Journal of Arid Land Studies 7S, 113–116.Google Scholar
Anderson, DM 2007. Virtual fencing – past, present and future. The Rangeland Journal 29, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM 2010. Geospatial methods and data analysis for assessing distribution of grazing livestock. In Proceedings of the 4th Grazing Livestock Nutrition Conference (ed. BW Hess, T DelCurto, JGP Bowman and RC Waterman), pp. 57–92. Western Section American Society of Animal Science, Champaign, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Anderson, A, McCuistion, KC 2008. Evaluating strategies for ranching in the 21st century: successfully managing rangeland for wildlife and livestock. Rangelands 30, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Weeks, DL 1989. Cattle liveweight sampled on a continuous versus intermittent basis. Livestock Production Science 23, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Smith, JN, Hulet, CV 1985. Livestock behavior – the neglected link in understanding the plant–animal interface. In Proceedings of a Conference on Multispecies Grazing (ed. FH Baker and RK Jones), pp. 116–148. Winrock International Institute, Morrilton, AK, USA.Google Scholar
Anderson, DM, Hulet, CV, Smith, JN, Shupe, WL, Murray, LW 1987a. Bonding of young sheep to heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Hulet, CV, Smith, JN, Shupe, WL, Murray, LW 1987b. Heifer disposition and bonding of lambs to heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19, 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Hulet, CV, Shupe, WL, Smith, JN, Murray, LW 1988. Response of bonded and non-bonded sheep to the approach of a trained border collie. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Hulet, CV, Hamadeh, SK, Smith, JN, Murray, LW 1990. Diet selection of bonded and non-bonded free-ranging sheep and cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Hulet, CV, Smith, JN, Shupe, WL, Murray, LW 1992. An attempt to bond weaned 3-month-old beef heifers to yearling ewes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Havstad, KM, Shupe, WL, Libeau, R, Smith, JN, Murray, LW 1994. Benefits and costs in controlling sheep bonded to cattle without wire fencing. Small Ruminant Research 14, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Estell, RE, Havstad, KM, Shupe, WL, Libeau, R, Murray, LW 1996. Differences in ewe and wether behavior when bonded to cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Murray, LW, Sun, P, Fredrickson, EL, Estell, RE, Nakamatsu, VB 2011. Characterizing foraging patterns among cattle and bonded and non-bonded small ruminants using spatial point process techniques. In Proceedings 22nd Annual Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture (ed. W Song), pp. 12–35. Kansas State Department of Statistics, Manhattan, KS, USA.Google Scholar
Animut, G, Goetsch, AL 2008. Co-grazing of sheep and goats: benefits and constraints. Small Ruminant Research 77, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Animut, G, Goetsch, AL, Aiken, GE, Puchala, R, Detweiler, G, Krehbiel, CR, Merkel, RC, Sahlu, T, Dawson, LJ, Johnson, ZB, Gipson, TA 2005a. Grazing behavior and energy expenditure by sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates. Small Ruminant Research 59, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Animut, G, Goetsch, AL, Aiken, GE, Puchala, R, Detweiler, G, Krehbiel, CR, Merkel, RC, Sahlu, T, Dawson, LJ, Johnson, ZB, Gipson, TA 2005b. Performance and forage selectivity of sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates. Small Ruminant Research 59, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, GW, Dudzinski, ML 1978. Ethology of free-ranging domestic animals. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, NY. USA.Google Scholar
Bangsund, DA, Nudell, DJ, Sell, RS, Leistritz, FL 2001. Economic analysis of using sheep to control leafy spurge. Journal of Range Management 54, 322–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, CT, Jacobs, JJ, Held, LJ, Smith, MA 1991. Multiple use of public rangeland: antelope and stocker cattle in Wyoming. Journal of Range Management 44, 390–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedell, TE 1968. Seasonal forage preferences of grazing cattle and sheep in western Oregon. Journal of Range Management 21, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, HM 1972. Rangeland management for livestock production. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK, USA.Google Scholar
Bell, FR, Kitchell, RL 1966. Taste reception in the goat, sheep and calf. The Journal of Physiology 183, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendersky, D, Díaz, FE, Cendoya, MG, Brizuela, MA, Cid, MS, Cibils, A, Pizzio, R 2011. Seasonal grazing distribution patterns of cattle and sheep in a heterogeneous subtropical grassland. In Diverse Rangelands for a Sustainable Society 9th International Rangeland Congress (ed. SR Feldman, GE Oliva and MB Sacido), pp. 593. 9th International Rangeland Congress, Rosario, Argentina.Google Scholar
Betteridge, K, Mackay, AD, Shepherd, TG, Barker, DJ, Budding, PJ, Devantier, BP, Costall, DA 1999. Effect of cattle and sheep treading on surface configuration of a sedimentary hill soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 743–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackford, RH Jr 1985. Multispecies systems for California. In Proceedings of a Conference on Multispecies Grazing (ed. FH Baker and RK Jones), pp. 204–206. Winrock International Institute, Morrilton, AK, USA.Google Scholar
Blanc, F, Thériez, M, Brelurut, A 1999. Effects of mixed-species stocking and space allowance on the behaviour and growth of red deer hinds and ewes at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blejwas, KM, Sacks, BN, Jaeger, MM, McCullough, DR 2002. The effectiveness of selective removal of breeding coyotes in reducing sheep predation. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J, Carlson, GE, Jackson, C Jr, Curry, WA 1967. Social cohesion of steers and sheep as a possible variable in grazing studies. Agronomy Journal 59, 481–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brelin, B 1979. Mixed grazing with sheep and cattle compared with single grazing. Swedish Journal of Agriculture Research 9, 113–120.Google Scholar
Brown, JH 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Bryant, FC, Kothmann, MM, Merrill, LB 1979. Diets of sheep, Angora goats, Spanish goats and white-tailed deer under excellent range conditions. Journal of Range Management 32, 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, J 2011. NASS, Special Tabulation ID 15240. Retrieved October 25, 2011, from http://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Special_Tabulations/Request_a_Tabulation/data-lab-records.html Google Scholar
Cairns, RB 1966. Development, maintenance, and extinction of social attachment behavior in sheep. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 62, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, EG, Johnson, RL 1983. Food habits of mountain goats, mule deer, and cattle on Chopaka Mountain, Washington, 1977–1980. Journal of Range Management 36, 488–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, CS, Williams, JR, Witt, DM, Insel, TR 1992. Oxytocin and social bonding. In Oxytocin in maternal, sexual, and social behaviors (ed. CA Pedersen, JD Caldwell, GF Jirikowski and TR Insel), vol. 652, pp. 204–211. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Celaya, R, Oliván, M, Ferreira, LMM, Martínez, A, García, U, Osoro, K 2007. Comparison of grazing behaviour, dietary overlap and performance in non-lactating domestic ruminants grazing on marginal heatherland areas. Livestock Science 106, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, RS, Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, M, Lynch, JJ 1987. The learning behaviour of sheep when introduced to wheat. II. Social transmission of wheat feeding and the role of the senses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, JL, Welch, D, Gordon, IJ 1995. The influence of vegetation pattern on the grazing of heather moorland by red deer and sheep. 1. The location of animals on grass heather mosaics. Journal of Applied Ecology 32, 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, L 2001. Multispecies grazing. Retrieved June 7, 2011, from http://www.icecubetopper.com/pdfs/docs/attra/attra_multispecies_grazing.pdf Google Scholar
Crawley, MJ 1983. Herbivory: dynamics of plant–animal interactions. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Davis, DS 1985. Special management and health considerations in multispecies grazing. In Proceedings of a Conference on Multispecies Grazing (ed. FH Baker and RK Jones), pp. 109–115. Winrock International Institute, Morrilton, AK.Google Scholar
Demarais, S, Osborn, DA, Jackley, JJ 1990. Exotic big game: a controversial resource. Rangelands 12, 121–125.Google Scholar
Denney, RN 1972. Relationship of wildlife to livestock on some developed ranches on the Laikipia Plateau, Kenya. Journal of Range Management 25, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Pozo, M, Osoro, K, Celaya, R 1998. Effects of complementary grazing by goats on sward composition and on sheep performance managed during lactation in perennial ryegrass and white clover pastures. Small Ruminant Research 29, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMiguel, D, Fortelius, M, Azanza, B, Morales, J 2008. Ancestral feeding state of ruminants reconsidered: earliest grazing adaptation claims a mixed condition for Cervidae. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickson, IA, Frame, J, Arnot, DP 1981. Mixed grazing of cattle and sheep versus cattle only in an intensive grassland system. Animal Production 33, 265–272.Google Scholar
Didier, G, Villca, Z, Abasto, P 1994. Diet selection and utilization by llama and sheep in a high altitude-arid rangeland of Bolivia. Journal of Range Management 47, 245–248.Google Scholar
Duffy, MP 2009. Should you try multi-species grazing? Farming The Journal of Northeast Agriculture. Retrieved June 7, 2011, from http://www.farmingmagazine.com/article.php?id=2817 Google Scholar
Dumont, B, D'hour, P, Petit, M 1995. The usefulness of grazing tests for studying the ability of sheep and cattle to exploit reproductive patches of pastures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B, Carrere, P, D'Hour, P 2002. Foraging in patchy grasslands: diet selection by sheep and cattle is affected by the abundance and spatial distribution of preferred species. Animal Research 51, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmail, SHM 1991. Multispecies grazing by cattle and sheep. Rangelands 13, 35–37.Google Scholar
Evans, DM, Redpath, SM, Evans, SA, Elston, DA, Gardner, CJ, Dennis, P, Pakeman, RJ 2006. Low intensity, mixed livestock grazing improves the breeding abundance of a common insectivorous passerine. Biology Letters 2, 636–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAOSTAT 2011. Live animals. Retrieved November 3, 2011, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/573/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=573#ancor Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, CD 1990. Mixed-species grouping in Thomson's and Grant's gazelles: the antipredator benefits. Animal Behaviour 39, 1116–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, TDA, Hodgson, J 1985. The reaction of grazing sheep and cattle to the presence of dung from the same or the other species. Grass and Forage Science 40, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, EL, Anderson, DM, Estell, RE, Havstad, KM, Shupe, WL, Remmenga, M 2001. Pen confinement of yearling ewes with cows or heifers for 14 days to produce bonded sheep. Small Ruminant Research 2051, 1–7.Google Scholar
Galaty, JG, Johnson, DL 1990. Introduction: pastoral systems in global perspective. In The world of pastoralism herding systems in comparative perspective (ed. JG Galaty and DL Johnson), pp. 1–31. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Gallina, S 1993. White-tailed deer and cattle diets at LaMichilia, Durango, Mexico. Journal of Range Management 46, 487–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenty, KG, Lee, GJ, Atkins, KD, Smith, AJ, Sladek, MA 2009. Precision management of merino sheep. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Symposium on Precision Agriculture in Australasia (ed. MG Trotter, EB Garraway and DW Lamb), pp. 87. University of New England Armidale NSW, Armidale, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Gegner, LE 2002. Predator control for sustainable and organic livestock production. Retrieved June 7, 2011, from http://www.livestockforlandscapes.com/pdfs/flerds see pg 11.pdfGoogle Scholar
Georgiadis, NJ, Ihwagi, F, Olwero, JGN, Romañach, SS 2007. Savanna herbivore dynamics in a livestock-dominated landscape II: ecological, conservation, and management implications of predator restoration. Biological Conservation 137, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grelen, HE, Thomas, GW 1957. Livestock and deer activities on the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Journal of Range Management 10, 34–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimp, HA 1988. Multi-species grazing and marketing. Rangelands 10, 275–278.Google Scholar
Goatcher, WD, Church, DC 1970a. Review of some nutritional aspects of the sense of taste. Journal of Animal Science 31, 973–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goatcher, WD, Church, DC 1970b. Taste response in ruminants. IV. Reactions of Pygmy goats, normal goats, sheep and cattle to acetic acid and quinine hydrochloride. Journal of Animal Science 31, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, IJ 2003. Browsing and grazing ruminants: are they different beasts? Forest Ecology and Management 181, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosnell, H, Travis, WR 2005. Ranchland ownership dynamics in the Rocky Mountain West. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 191–198.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govaerts, R 2001. How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50, 1085–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmundsson, O, Dyrmundsson, OR 1994. Horse grazing under cold and wet conditions: a review. Livestock Production Science 40, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havstad, KM, Fredrickson, EL Estell, RE 2004. Animal unit equivalents: an examination of the sheep to cattle ratio for stocking rangelands. Retrieved June 8, 2011 from http://usda-ars.nmsu.edu/biblio/pdf/426.pdf Google Scholar
Heady, HF 1964. Palatability of herbage and animal preference. Journal of Range Management 17, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, H, Child, RD 1994. Rangeland ecology and management. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA.Google Scholar
Heitschmidt, RK, Taylor, CS Jr 1991. Livestock production. In Grazing management an ecological perspective (ed. RK Heitschmidt and JW Stuth), pp. 161–177. Timber press, Portland, OR, USA.Google Scholar
Hester, AJ, Gordon, IJ, Baillie, GJ, Tappin, E 1999. Foraging behavior of sheep and red deer within natural heather/grass mosaics. Journal of Applied Ecology 36, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinch, GN, Lecrivain, E, Lynch, JJ, Elwin, RL 1987. Changes in maternal-young associations with increasing age of lambs. Applied Animal Behavior Science Science 17, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, NT, Carpenter, LH 1986. Viewpoint: animal-unit equivalents should be weighted by dietary differences. Journal of Range Management 39, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J 1979. Nomenclature and definitions in grazing studies. Grass and Forage Science 34, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, RR 1989. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification in ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holechek, JL, Pieper, RD 1992. Estimation of stocking rate on New Mexico rangelands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47, 116–119.Google Scholar
Holechek, JL, Pieper, RD, Herbel, CH 1989. Range management principles and practices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Hubbard, RE, Hansen, RM 1976. Diets of wild horses, cattle, and mule deer in the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Journal of Range Management 29, 389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, CV, Anderson, DM, Smith, JN, Shupe, WL 1987a. Bonding of sheep to cattle as an effective technique for predation control. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, CV, Shupe, WL, Howard, VW Jr 1987b. Coyotes, guard dogs, and electric fences. Rangelands 9, 102–105.Google Scholar
Hulet, CV, Anderson, DM, Smith, JN, Shupe, WL, Taylor, CA Jr, Murray, LW 1989. Bonding of goats to sheep and cattle for protection from predators. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, CV, Anderson, DM, Smith, JN, Shupe, WL, Murray, LW 1991. Bonding of Spanish kid goats to cattle and sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, CV, Anderson, DM, Nakamatsu, VB, Murray, LW, Pieper, RD 1992a. Diet selection of cattle and bonded small ruminants grazing arid rangeland. Sheep Research Journal 8, 11–18.Google Scholar
Hulet, CV, Anderson, DM, Shupe, WL, Murray, LW 1992b. Field versus pen bonding lambs to cattle. Sheep Research Journal 8, 69–72.Google Scholar
Hunter, RF 1960. Aims and methods in grazing-behavior studies on hill pastures. In Proceedings of the 8th International Grassland Congress (ed. CL Skidmore), pp. 454–457. Alden Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Janis, CM, Damuth, J, Theodor, JM 2000. Miocene ungulates and terrestrial primary productivity: where have all the browsers gone? Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 97, 7899–7904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jardine, JT, Anderson, M 1919. Range management on the national forests. US Department of Agriculture Bulletin 790. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Jordan, HE, Phillips, WA, Morrison, RD, Doyle, JJ, McKenzie, K 1988. A 3-year study of continuous mixed grazing of cattle and sheep: parasitism of offspring. International Journal of Parasitology 18, 779–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kare, MR, Halpern, BP 1961. Physiological and behavioral aspects of taste. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Kingery, JL, Mosley, JC, Bordwell, KC 1996. Dietary overlap among cattle and cervids in northern Idaho forests. Journal of Range Management 49, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koen, C 1987. Optimal stocking ranges for several species farming. Agricultural Systems 23, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothmann, MM 1966. Nutrient content of forage ingested in the morning compared to evening. Journal of Range Management 19, 95–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothmann, MM 1980. Nutrition of livestock grazing on range and pasture lands. In Digestive physiology and nutrition of ruminants, vol. 3 – Practical nutrition (ed. DC Church), pp. 56–90, 2nd edition. O & B Books Inc. Corvallis, Corvallis, OR, USA.Google Scholar
Kreuter, UP, Workman, JP 1996. Cattle and wildlife ranching in Zimbabwe. Rangelands 18, 44–47.Google Scholar
Kreuter, UP, Workman, JP 1997. Comparative profitability of cattle and wildlife ranches in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Environments 35, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, WC, Laycock, WA, Price, DA 1974. Relationship of taste, smell, sight, and touch to forage selection. Journal of Range Management 27, 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, WC, Sharp, LA 1978. Management approaches to reduce livestock losses from poisonous plants on rangeland. Journal of Range Management 31, 347–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laca, EA 2009. New Approaches and tools for grazing management. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larbi, A, Smith, JW, Raji, AM, Kurdi, IO, Adekunle, IO, Ladipo, DO 1997. Seasonal dynamics in dry matter degradation of browse in cattle, sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 25, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebbie, SHB 2004. Goats under household conditions. Small Ruminant Research 51, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnell, JD, Smith, ME, Odden, J, Kaczensky, P, Swenson, JE 1996. Strategies for the reduction of carnivore – livestock conflicts: a review. Norwegian Institute of Nature Research Oppdragsmelding 443, 1–118.Google Scholar
Loehle, C, Rittenhouse, LR 1982. An analysis of forage preference indices. Journal of Range Management 35, 316–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loucougaray, GA, Bonis, A, Bouzillé, J-B 2004. Effects of grazing by horses and/or cattle on the diversity of coastal grasslands in western France. Biological Conservation 116, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, CD 1988. Grazing behavior and diet selection of goats. Small Ruminant Research 1, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, GH 2007. Accounting for the world's rangelands. Rangelands 29, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marble, JR, Harper, KT 1989. Effect of timing of grazing on soil-surface cryptogrammic communities in a Great Basin low shrub desert: a preliminary report. Great Basin Naturalist 49, 104–107.Google Scholar
Marten, GC 1973. Alkaloids in reed canarygrass. In Anti-quality components of forages, Special Publication No. 4 (ed. AG Matches), pp. 15–31. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Mazzolli, M, Graipel, ME, Dunstone, N 2002. Mountain lion depredation in southern Brazil. Biological Conservation 105, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, JR 1978. Rangelands – fulfilling the promise through planning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Rangeland Congress (ed. DN Hyder), pp. 2–3. Peerless Printing, Denver, CO, USA.Google Scholar
McNaughton, SJ 1985. Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecological Monographs 55, 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, C, Duncan, PG, Fleurance, G, Georges, JY, Lila, M 2002. Comparative foraging and nutrition of horses and cattle in European wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellado, M, Valdez, R, Lara, LM, Lopez, R 2003. Stocking rate effects on goats: a research observation. Journal of Range Management 56, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellado, M, Olivares, L, Pittroff, W, Díaz, H, López, R, Villarreal, JA 2007. Oral morphology and dietary choices of goats on rangeland. Small Ruminant Research 71, 194–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, J, Bradford, GE 1992. Rangelands. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 42, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, JL 1985. Multispecies grazing: current use and activities in Texas and the Southwest. In Proceedings of a Conference on Multispecies Grazing (ed. FH Baker and RK Jones), pp. 39–44. Winrock International Institute, Morrilton, AK, USA.Google Scholar
Merrill, LB, Young, VA 1954. Results of grazing single classes of livestock in combination with several classes when stocking rates are constant. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Progress Report 1726. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Merrill, LB, Thomas, GW, Hardy, WT 1957. Livestock and deer ratios for Texas range lands. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication 221. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Milne, JA, Macrae, JC, Spence, AM, Wilson, S 1978. A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moen, AN 1973. Wildlife ecology: an analytical approach. Greeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P, Ben Ayed, M, Hervien, J, Lescoat, P 1997. Relationship between palatability and rate of intake in goats. In Recent advances in small ruminant nutrition (ed. JE Linberg, HL Gonda and I Ledin), vol. 34, pp. 121–123. Options Méditerranéennes, CIHEAM, Paris.Google Scholar
Morley, FHW, Donald, AD 1980. Farm management and systems of helminth control. Veterinary Parasitology 6, 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, T, Connolly, J 1976. Comparison of five rations of cattle and sheep. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 137–140.Google Scholar
Nombekela, SW, Murphy, MR, Gonyou, HW, Marden, JI 1994. Dietary preferences in early lactation cows as affected by primary tastes and some common feed flavors. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2393–2399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odadi, WO, Jain, M, Van Wieren, SE, Prins, HHT, Rubenstein, DI 2011. Facilitation between bovids and equids on an African savanna. Evolutionary Ecology Research 13, 237–252.Google Scholar
Pollock, ML, Legg, CJ, Holland, JP, Theobald, CM 2007. Assessment of expert opinion: seasonal sheep preference and plant response to grazing. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popay, I, Field, R 1996. Grazing animals as weed control agents. Weed Technology 10, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M Rasmussen, GA 2001. Determining your stocking rate. Utah State University Cooperative Extension NR/RM/04. Retrieved June 8, 2011, from http://extension.usu.edu/files/publications/publication/NR_RM_04.pdf Google Scholar
Pritz, RK, Launchbaugh, KL, Taylor, CA Jr 1997. Effects of breed and dietary experience on juniper consumption by goats. Journal of Range Management 50, 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralphs, MH, Kothmann, MM, Merrill, LB 1986. Cattle and sheep diets under short-duration grazing. Journal of Range Management 39, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raney, T, Skoet, J, Steinfeld, H (co-editors) 2009. Livestock in the balance Part 1. The state of food and agriculture, pp. 1–32. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Rocha, RA, Bresciani, KDS, Barros, TFM, Fernandes, LH, Silva, MB, Amarante, AFT 2008. Sheep and cattle grazing alternately: nematode parasitism and pasture decontamination. Small Ruminant Research 75, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, AJ, Dumont, B, Isselstein, J, Osoro, K, WallisDeVries, MF, Parente, G, Mills, J 2004. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. Biological Conservation 119, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, RC 1994. Are small-acreage livestock producers real ranchers? Rangelands 16, 161–166.Google Scholar
Ruyle, GB, Bowns, JE 1985. Forage use by cattle and sheep grazing separately and together on summer range in southwestern Utah. Journal of Range Management 38, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanon, HO, Kaboré-Zoungrana, C, Ledin, I 2007. Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area. Small Ruminant Research 67, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotland, RW, Wortley, AH 2003. How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 52, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotter, GW 1980. Management of wild ungulate habitat in the western United States and Canada: a review. Journal of Range Management 33, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehested, J, Søegaard, K, Danielsen, V, Roepstorff, A, Monrad, J 2004. Grazing with heifers and sows alone or mixed: herbage quality, sward structure and animal weight gain. Livestock Production Science 88, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seré, CA, Ayantude, A, Duncan, A, Freeman, A, Herrero, M, Tarawali, S, Wright, I 2008. Livestock production and poverty alleviation – challenges and opportunities in arid and semi-arid tropical rangeland based systems. In Multifunctional grasslands in a Changing World, vol I. XXI International Grassland Cong/VII International Rangeland Congress. Guangdong People's Publishing House, Beijing, China, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Scarnecchia, DL 1985. The animal-unit and animal-unit equivalent concepts in range science. Journal of Range Management 38, 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, JL 1985. Environmental and ecological implications of multispecies grazing. In Proceedings of a Conference on Multispecies Grazing (ed. FH Baker and RK Jones), pp. 232–233. Winrock International Institute, Morrilton, AK, USA.Google Scholar
Shipley, LA 1999. Grazers and browsers: How digestive morphology affects diet selection. In Grazing Behavior of Livestock and Wildlife Idaho Forest Wildlife and Range Experiment Station Bulletin No. 70 (ed. KL Launchbaugh, KD Sanders and JC Mosley), pp. 20–27. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.Google Scholar
Sinclair, ARE, Arcese, P 1995. Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Sinclair, ARE, Norton-Griffiths, M 1979. Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Sinclair, ARE, Packer, D, Mduma, SAR, Fryxel, JM 2008. Serengeti III: human impacts on ecosystem dynamics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skiles, JW 1984. A review of animal preference. In Developing strategies for rangeland management a report prepared by the committee on developing strategies for rangeland management Natural Research Council/National Academy of Science. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, pp. 153–213.Google Scholar
Smith, AD 1965. Determining common use grazing capacities by application of the key species concept. Journal of Range Management 18, 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B 1998. Moving ‘Em a guide to low stress animal handling. The Graziers Hui, Kamuela, HI, USA.Google Scholar
Smith, HJ, Archibald, RMcG 1965. Cross transmission of bovine parasites to sheep. Canadian Veterinary Journal 6, 91–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Solanki, GS 1994. Feeding habits and grazing behavior of goats in a semi-arid region of India. Small Ruminant Research 14, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, V 1981. Livestock management in the arid zone. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Squires, VR 1982. Dietary overlap between sheep, cattle, and goats when grazing in common. Journal of Range Management 35, 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, GL 1981. Coevolution of grasses and herbivores. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddart, LA, Smith, AD, Box, TW 1975. Range management, 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Tate, KW, Atwill, ER, McDougald, NK, George, MR 2003. Spatial and temporal patterns of cattle feces deposition on rangeland. Journal of Range Management 56, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, CA 1985. Multispecies grazing research overview (Texas). In Proceedings of a Conference on Multispecies Grazing (ed. FH Baker and RK Jones), pp. 65–83. Winrock International Institute, Morrilton, AK, USA.Google Scholar
Taylor, DB, Hinch, GN, Trotter, MG, Brown, WY, Price, IR, Doyle, EK, Lamb, DW 2009. What can sheep teach us about shelter use?. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Symposium on Precision Agriculture in Australasia (ed. MG Trotter, EB Garraway and DW Lamb), pp. 99. University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Umberger, SH, McKinno, BR Eller, AL Jr 1983. Adding sheep to cattle for increased profits sheep science and technology. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service Publication 410–851, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
Umstatter, C 2011. The evolution of virtual fences. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 75, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentine, JF 1990. Grazing management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, C, Prior, G, Littlewood, NA, Brooker, R, Pakeman, R 2009. Influence of livestock grazing on meadow pipit foraging behaviour in upland grasslands. Basic and Applied Ecology 10, 662–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dyne, GM, Brockington, NR, Szocs, Z, Duek, J, Ribic, CA 1980. Large herbivore subsystem. In Grasslands, systems analysis and man (ed. AI Breymeyer and GM van Dyne), pp. 269–537. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
van Niekerk, WA, Hassen, A, Snyman, LD, Rethman, NFG, Coertze, RJ 2009. Influence of mineral composition and rumen degradability of Atriplex nummularia (Hatfield Select F1) plants on selection preference of sheep. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 26, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Soest, PJ 1994. Ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavra, M 2005. Livestock grazing and wildlife: developing compatibilities. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 128–134.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 2009. Learning and dietary choice in herbivores. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, JW 1994. Multispecies grazing: the ecological advantage. Sheep Research Journal Special Issue, 52–64.Google Scholar
Warming, E 1895. Plantesamfund – Grundtroek af den økologiske Plantegeografi. P.G. Philipsens Forlag, Kjøbenhavn.Google Scholar
Warren, LE, Ueckert, DN, Shelton, M, Chamrad, AD 1984. Spanish goat diets on mixed-brush rangeland in the south Texas plains. Journal of Range Management 37, 340–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, PH, Haynes, RJ 2006. Effect of sheep, deer and cattle dung on herbage production and soil nutrient content. Grass and Forage Science 50, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yearsley, JM, Villalba, JJ, Gordon, IJ, Kyriazakis, I, Speakman, JR, Tolkamp, B, JIllius, AW, Duncan, AJ 2006. A theory of associating food types with their postingestive consequences. American Naturalist 167, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed