Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:18:01.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation through literature data on standardized ileal digestibility and basal ileal endogenous loss of amino acids associated with barley in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

H. K. Spindler ,
R. Mosenthin  and
M. Eklund
H. K. Spindler
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
R. Mosenthin
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
M. Eklund*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
*
† E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) and the basal ileal endogenous amino acid losses (IAAend) in barley for growing pigs. In total, 38 different barley treatments published in 26 peer-reviewed papers were used for the meta-analysis containing information on dietary composition including amino acid (AA) contents of the assay diets, and (or) barley samples, as well as apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of AA in barley. The SID of AA was determined by either correcting AID of AA for their IAAend or by regression analysis between the apparent ileal digestible and total dietary AA contents. The SID values obtained by correcting the AID values for their IAAend amounted to 70%, 77%, 74% and 63% for Lys, Met, Thr and Trp, whereas those based on regression analysis method were 82%, 82%, 69% and 55%, respectively. Estimates of basal ileal endogenous loss of CP in ileal digesta varied considerably and averaged 11.84 g/kg dry matter intake (DMI), whereas IAAend for indispensable AA ranged from 0.05 g/kg DMI for Trp to 1.90 g/kg DMI for Leu. In most cases, these estimates were considerably higher than previously reported values for IAAend. The results of the present regression analysis indicate for most AA higher SID values compared with SID of most AA that were obtained by correcting AID values for IAAend. In view of the observed high variations in IAAend and the low CP content of the barley samples, estimating SID of AA based on literature data by means of the regression method may improve accuracy of SID coefficients for barley. In contrast, transformation of AID values into their corresponding SID values by using a constant correction factor for IAAend adds an additional source of error, thereby reducing the precision in estimating SID of AA.

Keywords

amino acidsmeta-analysispigsstandardized ileal digestibilitybarley
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 10 , October 2014 , pp. 1603 - 1611
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFZ, Ajinomoto Eurolysine, Aventis Animal Nutrition, INRA, ITCF 2000. AmiPig, Ileal standardized digestibility of amino acids in feedstuffs for pigs. Association Française de Zootechnie, Paris.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Åman, P and Eggum, BO 1987. Nutritive value of danish-grown barley varieties, I, carbohydrates and other major constituents. Journal of Cereal Science 6, 173–186.Google Scholar
Baidoo, SK and Liu, YG 1998. Hull-less barley for swine: ileal and faecal digestibility of proximate nutrients, amino acids and non-starch polysaccharides. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 76, 397–403.Google Scholar
Baidoo, SK, Liu, YG and Yungblut, D 1998. Effect of microbial enzyme supplementation on energy, amino acid digestibility and performance of pigs fed hulless barley based diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78, 625–631.Google Scholar
Chesson, A 1993. Feed enzymes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 45, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degussa 2010. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids. Degussa AG, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
De Lange, CF, Souffrant, WB and Sauer, WC 1990. Real ileal protein and amino acid digestibilities in feedstuffs for growing pigs as determined with the 15N-isotope dilution technique. Journal of Animal Science 68, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolešová, P, Nitrayová, S, Patráš, P and Heger, J 2009. Effect of essential and non-essential amino acid addition to a nitrogen-free diet on endogenous ileal amino acid flow in growing pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science 54, 475–480.Google Scholar
Eklund, M 2006. Methodological considerations for the determination of standardized ileal amino acid digestibilities in piglets. PhD thesis, Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Eklund, M, Mosenthin, R, Piepho, HP and Rademacher, M 2008a. Effect of dietary crude protein level on basal ileal endogenous losses and standardized ileal digestibilities of crude protein and amino acids in newly weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 92, 578–590.Google Scholar
Eklund, M, Mosenthin, R, Piepho, HP and Rademacher, M 2008b. Estimates of basal ileal endogenous losses of amino acids by regression analysis and determination of standardized ileal amino acid digestibilities from casein in newly weaned pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, AD, Blakeney, AB and O’Brien, L 1999. Cereal structure and composition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 629–650.Google Scholar
Fan, MZ and Sauer, WC 1995. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for pigs with the direct, difference, and regression methods. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2364–2374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, MZ and Sauer, WC 2002. Determination of true ileal amino acid digestibility and the endogenous amino acid outputs associated with barley samples for growing-finishing pigs by the regression analysis technique. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1593–1605.Google Scholar
Fan, MZ, Sauer, WC and Li, S 1993. The additivity of the digestible energy and apparent ileal digestible amino acid supply in barley, wheat and canola meal or soybean meal diets for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 70, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, MZ, Sauer, WC and McBurney, MI 1995. Estimation by regression analysis of endogenous amino acid levels in digesta collected from the distal ileum of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2319–2328.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT 2011. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. Retrieved 16 January 2013, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx Google Scholar
Fernández-Fígares, I, García, MA, Ruiz, R and Rubio, LA 2008. Evaluation of barley and triticale as feed ingredients in growing Iberian pigs: amino acid and carbohydrate ileal digestibility. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88, 870–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, MF, Darcy-Vrillon, B, Laplace, JP, Picard, M, Cadenhead, A, Jung, J, Brown, D and Franklin, MF 1994. The measurement of dietary amino acid digestibility in pigs, rats and chickens: a comparison of methodologies. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48, 305–324.Google Scholar
Furuya, S and Kaji, Y 1989. Estimation of the true ileal digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen from their apparent values for growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 26, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuya, S and Kaji, Y 1991. Additivity of the apparent and true ileal digestible amino acid supply in barley, maize, wheat or soya-bean meal based diets for growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 32, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuya, S, Nagano, R and Kaji, Y 1986. True ileal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids in protein sources as determined by a regression method for growing pigs. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 57, 859–870.Google Scholar
Gabert, VM, Jørgensen, H, Brunsgaard, G, Eggum, BO and Jensen, J 1996. The nutritional value of new high-lysine barley varieties determined with rats and young pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76, 443–450.Google Scholar
GfE 2006. Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie, Ausschuss für Bedarfsnormen. Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung von Schweinen 2006. Energie- und Nährstoffbedarf landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere 10. Frankfurt a M, DLG-Verlag, Germany, 247pp.Google Scholar
Green, S, Bertrand, SL, Duron, MJC and Maillard, RA 1987. Digestibility of amino acids in maize, wheat and barley meal, measured in pigs with ileo-rectal anastomosis and isolation of the large intestine. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 41, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, H, Kuhla, S, Souffrant, WB, Tuchscherer, A and Metges, CC 2006. Effect of partial dehulling of two- and six-row barley varieties on precaecal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 60, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, V and Sève, B 1999. Effects of body weight and feed intake level on basal ileal endogenous losses in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3281–3288.Google Scholar
Høøk Presto, M, Lyberg, K and Lindberg, JE 2010. Effect of body weight on ileal endogenous nitrogen and amino acid loss in PVTC-cannulated pigs. Livestock Science 134, 18–20.Google Scholar
Ige, DV, Kiarie, E, Akinremi, OO, Rossnagel, B, Flatten, D and Nyachoti, CM 2010. Energy and nutrient digestibility in a hulless low-phytate phosphorus barley fed to finishing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 90, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansman, AJM, Smink, W, van Leeuwen, P and Rademacher, M 2002. Evaluation through literature data of the amount and amino acid composition of basal endogenous crude protein at the terminal ileum. Animal Feed Science and Technology 98, 49–60.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, H, Gabert, VM and Eggum, BO 1997. The nutritional value of high-lysine barley determined in rats, young pigs and growing pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 73, 287–295.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindred, DR, Verhoeven, TMO, Weightman, RM, Swanston, JS, Agu, RC, Brosnan, JM and Sylvester-Bradley, R 2008. Effects of variety and fertiliser nitrogen on alcohol yield, grain yield, starch and protein content, and protein composition of winter wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 48, 46–57.Google Scholar
Kluth, H, Mantei, M, Elwert, C and Rodehutscord, M 2005. Variation in precaecal amino acid and energy digestibility between pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars determined using a linear regression approach. British Poultry Science 46, 325–332.Google Scholar
Lahaye, L, Garnier, P, Thibault, JN and Sève, B 2004. Technological processes of feed manufacturing affect protein endogenous losses and amino acid availability for body protein deposition in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 113, 141–156.Google Scholar
Leterme, P and Théwis, A 2004. Effect of pig bodyweight on ileal amino acid endogenous losses after ingestion of a protein-free diet enriched in pea inner fibre isolates. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 407–417.Google Scholar
Leterme, P, Souffrant, WB and Théwis, A 2000. Effect of barley fibres and barley intake on the ileal endogenous nitrogen losses in piglets. Journal of Cereal Science 31, 229–239.Google Scholar
Lin, FD, Knabe, DA and Tanksley, TD Jr. 1987. Apparent digestibility of amino acids, gross energy and starch in corn, sorghum, wheat, barley, oat groats and wheat middlings for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 64, 1655–1665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, MB, Sweeney, T, Callan, JJ and O’Doherty, JV 2007. Effects of increasing the intake of dietary β-glucans by exchanging wheat for barley on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, intestinal microflora, volatile fatty acid concentration and manure ammonia emissions in finishing pigs. Animal 1, 812–819.Google Scholar
Mitchall, KG, Bell, JM and Sosulski, FW 1976. Digestibility and feeding value of hulless barley for pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56, 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moter, V and Stein, HH 2004. Effect of feed intake on endogenous losses and amino acid and energy digestibility by growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3518–3525.Google Scholar
Myrie, SB, Bertolo, RF, Sauer, WC and Ball, RO 2008. Effect of common antinutritive factors and fibrous feedstuffs in pig diets on amino acid digestibilities with special emphasis on threonine. Journal of Animal Science 86, 609–619.Google Scholar
Nitrayová, S, Patráš, P, Sommer, A and Heger, J 2006. Effect of microbial phytase on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of phosphorus-adequate diets in growing pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 60, 131–140.Google Scholar
NRC 2010. Nutrient Requirements in Swine (10th edition). USA National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
NRC 2012. Nutrient requirements in swine (11th edition). USA National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nyachoti, CM, de Lange, CFM and Schulze, H 1997. Estimating endogenous amino acid flows at the terminal ileum and true ileal amino acid digestibilities in feedstuffs for growing pigs using the homoarginine method. Journal of Animal Science 75, 3206–3213.Google Scholar
Nyachoti, CM, de Lange, CFM, McBride, BW, Leeson, S and Gabert, VM 2000. Endogenous gut nitrogen losses in growing pigs are not caused by increased protein synthesis rates in the small intestine. Journal of Nutrition 130, 566–572.Google Scholar
O’Connell, JM, Callan, JJ and O’Doherty, JV 2006. The effect of dietary crude protein level, cereal type and exogenous enzyme supplementation on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, faecal volatile fatty acid concentration and ammonia emissions from pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 127, 73–88.Google Scholar
O’Connell, JM, Sweeney, T, Callan, JJ and O’Doherty, JV 2005. The effect of cereal type and exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig diets on nutrient digestibility, intestinal microflora, volatile fatty acid concentration and manure ammonia emissions from finisher pigs. Animal Science 81, 357–364.Google Scholar
Peers, DG and Taylor, AG 1977. The influence of the variety of barley and level of nitrogen fertilisation on the digestibility and metabolisable energy value of barley meal in the pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 602–606.Google Scholar
Pedersen, C, Boersma, MG and Stein, HH 2007. Energy and nutrient digestibility in NutriDense corn and other cereal grains fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2473–2483.Google Scholar
Perttilä, S, Siljander-Rasi, H, Partanen, K, Alaviuhkola, T and Suomi, K 2002. Apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and the nutritive value of the triticale cultivars moreno and ulrika for growing-finishing pigs. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 11, 93–105.Google Scholar
Pettersson, Å and Lindberg, JE 1997. Ileal and total tract digestibility in pigs of naked and hulled barley with different starch composition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 66, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reverter, M and Lindberg, JE 1998. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs given a barley-based diet with increasing inclusion of lucerne leaf meal. Animal Science 67, 131–138.Google Scholar
Rowan, TG and Lawrence, TLJ 1986. Ileal apparent digestibilities of amino acids, growth and tissue deposition in growing pigs fed low glucosinolate rapeseed meals. Journal of Agricultural Science 107, 493–504.Google Scholar
SAS 2008. SAS/STAT® user’s guide, version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC and Ozimek, L 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC, Giovannetti, PM and Stothers, SC 1974. Availability of amino acids from barley, wheat, triticale, and soybean meal for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54, 97–105.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC, Stothers, SC and Phillips, GD 1977. Apparent availabilities of amino acids in corn, wheat and barley for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57, 585–597.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC, Kennelly, JJ, Aherne, FX and Cichon, RM 1981. Availabilities of amino acids in barley and wheat for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, WC, Fan, MZ, Mosenthin, R, Drochner, W and Mello, JPFD 2000. Methods for measuring ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs. In Farm animal metabolism and nutrition (pp. 279–306). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, WC, He, JM, Fan, MZ, Cervantes, M, Kies, A and Caine, W 2001. Variability of amino acid digestibilities in pigs: inherent factors in feedstuffs and considerations in methodology. Journal of Animal Feed Science 10, suppl. 1 115–138.Google Scholar
Schröder, H, Schulz, E and Oslage, HJ 1989. Zur Verdaulichkeit von Aminosäuren in unterschiedlichen Abschnitten des Verdauungstraktes bei wachsenden Schweinen. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 61, 145–158.Google Scholar
Skendi, A, Biliaderis, CG, Lazaridou, A and Izydorczyk, MS 2003. Structure and rheological properties of water soluble β-glucans from oat cultivars of Avena sativa and Avena bysantina . Journal of Cereal Science 38, 15–31.Google Scholar
Stein, HH, Trottier, NL, Bellaver, C and Easter, RA 1999. The effect of feeding level and physiological status on total flow and amino acid composition of endogenous protein at the distal ileum in swine. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1180–1187.Google Scholar
Stein, HH, Sève, B, Fuller, MF, Moughan, PJ and de Lange, CFM 2007. Invited review: amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredient: terminology and application. Journal of Animal Science 85, 172–180.Google Scholar
Taverner, MR, Hume, ID and Farell, DJ 1981a. Availability to pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. I. Endogenous levels of amino acids in ileal digesta and feces of pigs given cereal diets. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 149–158.Google Scholar
Taverner, MR, Hume, ID and Farell, DJ 1981b. Availability to pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. II. Apparent and true ileal availability. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Egmond, K, Bresser, T and Bouwman, L 2002. The European nitrogen case. Ambio 31, 72–78.Google Scholar
Yin, YL, Huang, RL, Zhang, HY, Chen, CM, Li, TJ and Pan, YF 1993. Nutritive value of feedstuffs and diets for pigs: I. Chemical composition, apparent ileal and faecal digestibilities. Animal Feed Science and Technology 44, 1–27.Google Scholar
Yin, YL, Baidoo, SK, Lin, LZ, Liu, YG, Schulze, H and Simmins, PH 2001a. The effect of different carbohydrase and protease supplementation on apparent (ileal and overall) digestibility of nutrients of five hulless barley varieties in young pigs. Livestock Production Science 71, 109–120.Google Scholar
Yin, YL, Baidoo, SK, Schulze, H and Simmins, PH 2001b. Effects of supplementing diets containing hulless barley varieties having different levels of non-starch polysaccharides with β-glucanase and xylanase on the physiological status of the gastrointestinal tract and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. Livestock Production Science 71, 97–107.Google Scholar
Yin, YL, Huang, RL, Zhong, HY, Li, TJ, Souffrant, WB and de Lange, CF 2002. Evaluation of mobile nylon bag technique for determining apparent ileal digestibilities of protein and amino acids in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed