Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:14:51.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of replacing grass silage with either maize silage or concentrates during late pregnancy on the performance of breeding ewes fed isonitrogenous diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2013

R. W. Annett ,
A. F. Carson  and
A. W. Gordon
R. W. Annett*
Affiliation:
Agriculture Branch, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT26 6DR, UK
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agriculture Branch, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT26 6DR, UK
A. W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, AFBI Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A study was undertaken to investigate the performance of breeding ewes fed a range of forage and concentrate-based diets in late pregnancy, balanced for supply of metabolizable protein (MP). For the final 6 weeks before lambing, 104 twin-bearing multiparous ewes were offered one of four diets: adlibitum precision-chop grass silage + 0.55 kg/day concentrates (GS); ad libitum maize silage + 0.55 kg/day concentrates (MS); a 1 : 1 mixture (on a dry matter (DM) basis) of grass silage and maize silage fed ad libitum + 0.55 kg/day (GSMS); or 1.55 kg/day concentrates + 50 g/day chopped barley straw (C). The CP content of the concentrates was varied between treatments (157 to 296 g/kg DM) with the aim of achieving a daily intake of 130 g/day MP across all treatments. Compared with ewes fed GS, forage DM intake was higher (P < 0.05) in ewes fed MS (+0.21 kg/day) and GSMS (+0.16 kg/day), resulting in higher (P < 0.001) total DM intakes with these treatments. C ewes had the lowest total DM intake of all the treatments examined (P < 0.001). C ewes lost more live weight (LW; P < 0.001) and body condition score (BCS; P < 0.05) during the first 3 weeks of the study but there were no dietary effects on ewe LW or BCS thereafter. The incidence of dystocia was lower (P < 0.01) in C ewes compared with those offered silage-based diets (7.5% v. 37.4% ewes), and was higher (P < 0.01) in ewes fed MS compared with GS or GSMS (50.7%, 34.7% and 26.9%, respectively). There were no significant dietary effects on the plasma metabolite concentrations of ewes in late pregnancy, pre-weaning lamb mortality, weaned lamb output per ewe or on lamb growth rate. The results of this study demonstrate that both maize silage and all-concentrate diets can replace grass silage in pregnant ewe rations without impacting on performance, provided the supply of MP is non-limiting. The higher incidence of dystocia in ewes fed maize silage as the sole forage is a concern.

Keywords

nutritiondystocialambsalternative forages
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 6 , June 2013 , pp. 957 - 964
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC) 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Annett, RW, Carson, AF 2006. Effects of plane of nutrition during the first month of pregnancy on conception rate, foetal development and lamb output of mature and adolescent ewes. Animal 82, 947–954.Google Scholar
Annett, RW, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER 2008. Effects of digestible undegradable protein (DUP) supply and fish oil supplementation of ewes during late pregnancy on colostrum production and lamb output. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 270–288.Google Scholar
Annett, RW, Dawson, LER, Edgar, H, Carson, AF 2009. Effects of source and level of fish oil supplementation in late pregnancy on feed intake, colostrum production and lamb output of ewes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 154, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annett, RW, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Kilpatrick, DJ 2011a. Effects of breed and age on the performance of crossbred hill ewes sourced from Scottish Blackface dams. Animal 5, 356–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annett, RW, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Kilpatrick, DJ 2011b. Effects of dam breed and dietary source of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the growth and carcass characteristics of lambs sourced from hill sheep flocks. Animal 5, 1023–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, HJ, Chestnutt, DMB 1990. Influence of shearing regime and grass silage quality on the performance of pregnant ewes. Animal Production 51, 573–582.Google Scholar
Blood, DC, Radostits, OM, Gay, CC 1994. Veterinary medicine, 8th edition. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Brown, DC, Thomas, EM 1989. Feeding maize silage to pregnant ewes. Animal Production 48, 647.Google Scholar
Burke, F, Murphy, JJ, O'Donovan, MA, O'Mara, FP, Kavanagh, S, Mulligan, FJ 2007. Comparative evaluation of alternative forages to grass silage in the diet of early lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 908–917.Google Scholar
Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Irwin, D, Kilpatrick, DJ 2004. The effect of management system at lambing and flock genetics on lamb output and labour requirements on lowland sheep farms. Animal Science 78, 439–450.Google Scholar
Connolly, L 2001. Labour on sheep farms. In Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum. Tullamore, Co., Offaly, p. 82.Google Scholar
Crosby, TF, Boland, TM, Brophy, PO, Quinn, PJ, Callan, JJ, Joyce, D 2004. The effects of offering mineral blocks to ewes pre-mating and in late pregnancy on block intake, pregnant ewe performance and immunoglobulin status of the progeny. Animal Science 79, 493–504.Google Scholar
Dawson, LER, Carson, AF 2002. Effects of crossbred ewe genotype and ram genotype on ewe prolificacy, lamb viability and lamb output in the lowland sector. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 139, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) 2010. Land use and livestock on agricultural holdings: June survey of agriculture and horticulture. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/foodfarm/landuselivestock/junesurvey/documents/UK_timeseries.xlsGoogle Scholar
Easson, DL, Fearnehough, W 2000. Effects of plastic mulch, sowing date and cultivar on the yield and maturity of forage maize grown under marginal climatic conditions in Northern Ireland. Grass and Forage Science 55, 221–231.Google Scholar
European Commission 2006. Study on environmental consequences of sheep and goat farming and of the sheep and goat premium system. Final report prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, July 2006.Google Scholar
Flanagan, S 2003. Indoor and outdoor lambing systems compared. In Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum. Tullamore, Co., Offaly, p. 81.Google Scholar
Fraser, AF, Terhune, M 1977. Radiographic studies of postural behavior in sheep fetus. 2. Complex fetal movements. Applied Animal Ethology 3, 235–246.Google Scholar
Friends of the Earth 2008. What's feeding our food: the environmental and social impacts of the livestock sector. Retrieved August 23, 2012, from http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/livestock_impacts_summary.pdfGoogle Scholar
Juniper, DT, Browne, EM, Fisher, AV, Bryant, MJ, Nute, GR, Beever, DE 2005. Intake, growth and meat quality of steers given diets based on varying proportions of maize silage and grass silage. Animal Science 81, 159–170.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Kilpatrick, CM, Cushnahan, A, Murphy, JA 2002. The cost of producing and feeding forages. Proceedings of the 13th International Silage Conference, Auchincruive, Scotland, UK, pp. 322–323.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Lively, FO, Kilpatrick, DJ, Moss, BW 2007. Effects of replacing grass silage with either maize or whole-crop wheat silages on the performance and meat quality of beef cattle offered two levels of concentrates. Animal 1, 613–623.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Kilpatrick, DJ, Mayne, CS, Gordon, FJ 2008. Effects of replacing grass silage with maize silages, differing in maturity, on performance and potential concentrate sparing effect of dairy cows offered two feed value grass silages. Livestock Science 119, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kirkland, RM, Patterson, DC 2006. The effect of quality of grass and maize silage on the intake and performance of beef cattle. Livestock Science 100, 179–188.Google Scholar
Kliem, KE, Morgan, R, Humphries, DJ, Shingfield, KJ, Givens, DI 2008. Effect of replacing grass silage with maize silage in the diet on bovine milk fatty acid composition. Animal 2, 1850–1858.Google Scholar
McMurray, CH, Blanchflower, WJ, Rice, DA 1984. Automated kinetic method for d-3-hydroxybutyrate in plasmas or serum. Clinical Chemistry 30, 421–425.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C, Carson, AF, McCoy, MA, Dawson, LER, Irwin, D, Gordon, AW, Kilpatrick, DJ 2009. Effects of supplementation with barium selenate on the fertility, prolificacy and lambing performance of hill sheep. Veterinary Record 164, 265–272.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, JV, Maher, PF, Crosby, TF 1997. The performance of pregnant ewes and their progeny when offered grass silage, maize silage or a maize silage/ensiled super pressed pulp mixture during late pregnancy. Livestock Production Science 52, 11–19.Google Scholar
Phipps, RH 1994. Complementary forages for milk production. In Recent developments in animal nutrition (ed. PC Garnsworthy and DJA Cole), pp. 215–230. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Russel, AJF 1984. Means of assessing the adequacy of nutrition of pregnant ewes. Livestock Production Science 11, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, AJF, Doney, JM, Gunn, RG 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 72, 451–454.Google Scholar
Speijers, MHM, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Gordon, AW 2009. Effects of genotype and plane of nutrition on growth and carcass characteristics of lambs from hill sheep systems. Animal 3, 1232–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, RWJ 1986. The effects of plane of nutrition and type of diet offered to yearling Friesian steers during a winter store period on subsequent performance. Animal Production 42, 29–37.Google Scholar