Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:17:05.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of egg storage duration and brooding temperatures on chick growth, intestine morphology and nutrient transporters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2017

S. Yalcin*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
I. Gursel*
Affiliation:
THORLAB, Molecular Biology and Genetic Department, Science Faculty, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
G. Bilgen
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
B. H. Horuluoglu
Affiliation:
THORLAB, Molecular Biology and Genetic Department, Science Faculty, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
G. Gucluer
Affiliation:
THORLAB, Molecular Biology and Genetic Department, Science Faculty, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
G. T. Izzetoglu
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
*
Get access

Abstract

The effects of egg storage duration (ESD) and brooding temperature (BT) on BW, intestine development and nutrient transporters of broiler chicks were investigated. A total of 396 chicks obtained from eggs stored at 18°C for 3 days (ESD3-18°C) or at 14°C for 14 days (ESD14-14°C) before incubation were exposed to three BTs. Temperatures were initially set at 32°C, 34°C and 30°C for control (BT-Cont), high (BT-High) and low (BT-Low) BTs, respectively. Brooding temperatures were decreased by 2°C each at days 2, 7, 14 and 21. Body weight was measured at the day of hatch, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42. Cloacal temperatures of broilers were recorded from 1 to 14 days. Intestinal morphology and gene expression levels of H+-dependent peptide transporter (PepT1) and Na-dependent glucose (SGLT1) were evaluated on the day of hatch and 14. Cloacal temperatures of chicks were affected by BTs from days 1 to 8, being the lowest for BT-Low chicks. BT-High resulted in the heaviest BWs at 7 days, especially for ESD14-14°C chicks. This result was consistent with longer villus and larger villus area of ESD14-14°C chicks at BT-High conditions. From 14 days to slaughter age, BT had no effect on broiler weight. ESD3-18°C chicks were heavier than ESD14-14°C chicks up to 28 days. The PepT1 and SGLT1 expression levels were significantly higher in ESD3-18°C chicks than ESD14-14°C on the day of hatch. There was significant egg storage by BT interaction for PepT1 and SGLT1 transporters at day 14. ESD14-14°C chicks had significantly higher expression of PepT1 and SGLT1 at BT-Low than those at BT-Cont. ESD14-14°C chicks upregulated PepT1 gene expression 1.15 and 1.57-fold at BT-High and BT-Low, respectively, compared with BT-Cont, whereas PepT1 expression was downregulated 0.67 and 0.62-fold in ESD3-18°C chicks at BT-High and BT-Low. These results indicated that pre-incubation egg storage conditions and BTs affected intestine morphology and PepT1 and SGLT1 nutrient transporters expression in broiler chicks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barri, A, Honaker, CF, Sottosanti, JR, Hulet, RM and McElroy, AP 2011. Effect of incubation temperature on nutrient transporters and small intestine morphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 90, 118125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H, Pan, Y-X, Wong, EA and Webb, KE Jr 2005. Dietary protein level and stage of development affect expression of an intestinal peptide transporter (cPepT1) in chickens. Journal of Nutrition 135, 193198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, VL, Wineland, MJ, Fasenko, GM and Donaldson, WE 2001. Egg storage effects on plasma glucose and supply and demand tissue glycogen concentrations of broiler embryos. Poultry Science 80, 17291735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, VL, Wineland, MJ, Fasenko, GM and Donaldson, WE 2002. Egg storage alters weight of supply and demand organs of broiler chicken embryos. Poultry Science 81, 17381743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, CRAM, Vicentini-Paulino, LM, Buratini, J, Castilho, ACS and Pinheiro, DF 2011. Messenger ribonucleic acid abundance of intestinal enzymes and transporters in feed-restricted and refed chickens at different ages. Poultry Science 90, 863868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fasenko, GM 2007. Egg storage and the embryo. Poultry Science 86, 10201024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, ER, Li, H, Emmerson, DA, Webb, KE and Wong, EA 2008. Dietary protein quality and feed restriction influence abundance of nutrient transporter mRNA in the small intestine of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition 138, 262271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, ER, Li, H, Emmerson, DA, Webb, KE and Wong, EA 2007. Developmental regulation of nutrient transporter and enzyme mRNA abundance in the small intestine of broilers. Poultry Science 86, 17391753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goliomytis, M, Tsipouzian, T and Hager-Theodorides, A 2015. Effects of egg storage on hatchability, performance and immunocompetence parameters of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 94, 22572265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibach, FH and Ganapathy, V 1996. Peptide transporters in the intestine and kidney. Annual Review of Nutrition 16, 99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H, Gilbert, ER, Zhang, Y, Crasta, O, Emmerson, DA, Webb, KE Jr and Wong, EA 2008. Expression profiling of the solute carrier gene family in chicken intestine from the late embryonic to early post-hatch stages. Animal Genetics 39, 407424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madsen, SL and Wong, EA 2011. Expression of the chicken peptide transporter 1 and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α following feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Poultry Science 90, 22952300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malheiros, RD, Moraes, VMB, Brunu, LDG, Malheiros, EB, Furlan, RL and Macari, M 2000. Environmental temperature and cloacal and surface temperatures of broiler chicks in first week post-hatch. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 9, 111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijerhof, R 1992. Pre-incubation holding of hatching eggs. World’s Poultry Science Journal 48, 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, R 2012. The importance of brooding period. XXIV World’s Poultry Congress. 5–9 August 2012, Salvador, Brazil. Retrieved on 27 November 2015 from http://www.facta.org.br/wpc2012-cd/pdfs/plenary/ Roos_Molenaar.pdf.Google Scholar
Murakami, H, Akiba, Y and Horiguchi, M 1992. Growth and utilization of nutrients in newly-hatched chick with or without removal of residual yolk. Growth Development and Aging 56, 7584.Google ScholarPubMed
Noy, Y and Sklan, D 1999. Energy utilization in newly hatched chicks. Poultry Science 78, 17501756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obst, BS and Diamond, J 1992. Ontogenesis of intestinal nutrient transport in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) and its relation to growth. The Auk 109, 451464.Google Scholar
Reis, LH, Gama, LT and Soares, MC 1997. Effects of short storage conditions and broiler breeder age on hatchability, hatching time and chick weights. Poultry Science 76, 14591466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, J and Lunam, CA 2002. Effect of pre-incubation storage conditions on hatchability, chick weight at hatch and hatching time in broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 43, 374383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulte-Drüggelte, R 2011. Recommendations for hatching egg handling and storage. Lohmann Information 46, 5558.Google Scholar
Scott, TR and Washburn, KW 1985. Evaluation of growth, hormonal, and hematological responses of neonatal chickens to reduced temperature brooding. Poultry Science 64, 777784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sklan, D 2001. Development of digestive tract of poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal 57, 415428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tona, K, Onagbesan, O, De Ketelaere, B, Decuypere, E and Bruggeman, V 2004. Effects of age of broiler breeders and egg storage on egg quality, hatchability, chick quality, chick weight, and chick posthatch growth to forty-two days. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13, 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tona, K, Bamelis, F, De Ketelaere, B, Bruggeman, V, Moraes, VMB, Buyse, J, Onagbesan, O and Decuypere, E 2003. Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality, and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science 82, 736741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uni, Z, Ganot, S and Sklan, D. 1998. Posthatch development of mucosal function in broiler small intestine. Poultry Science 77, 7582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yalcin, S, Gursel, I, Bilgen, G, Horuluoglu, BT, Gucluer, G and Izzetoglu, GT 2016. Egg storage duration and hatch window affect gene expression of nutrient transporters and intestine morphological parameters of early hatched broiler chicks. Animal 10, 805811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yalcin, S and Siegel, PB 2003. Developmental stability of broiler embryos in relation to length of egg storage prior to incubation. Japanese Poultry Science 40, 298308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, IS and Trayhurn, P 2003. Glucose transporters (GLUT and SGLT): expanded families of sugar transport proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 89, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwarycz, B and Wong, EA 2013. Expression of the peptide transporters PepT1, PepT2, and PHT1 in the embryonic and posthatch chick. Poultry Science 92, 13141321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed