Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:23:27.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-feeding behaviour in UK leisure horses and associated feeding routine risk factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Hockenhull  and
E Creighton
J Hockenhull*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK Department of Biological Sciences, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK
E Creighton
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many horses display unwanted behaviour prior to receiving concentrate feed or forage. These behaviours have received relatively little scientific attention as a distinct group of equine behaviour problems and risk factors for their performance have not been quantified. The objective of this study was to generate data on the diet of UK leisure horses, the feeding practices employed by their carers, and the prevalence of behaviour problems seen prior to feeding. A convenience sample of leisure horse carers were surveyed via a self-administered internet survey. Each carer provided data for only one horse, and to minimise recall bias was asked to report details of their horse's feeding routine over the week prior to completing the survey. Recruitment was spread over twelve calendar months. The survey was completed by 1,324 respondents, each reporting data for an individual horse in their care. Pre-feeding behaviour problems were common within the sample and were reduced by Principal Components Analysis into three components labelled: aggression; frustration; and stereotypies. While the specific risk factors associated with these problems differed, they fell into four distinct themes: how the horse is fed; the use of nutritional supplements; exercise and stabling; and the performance of oral investigative behaviour. The risk factors for pre-feeding behaviour problems identified in this study raise concerns about the way domestic horses are currently fed and managed. In conjunction with published empirical evidence they indicate that the welfare of domestic horses may be improved by adopting a feeding regime and management system more suited to their physiological and behavioural needs.

Keywords

animal welfarediethorsemanagementnutritional supplementsstereotypies
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 297 - 308
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Archer, DL and Proudman, CJ 2006 Epidemiological clues to preventing colic. The Veterinary Journal 172: 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.04.002Google ScholarPubMed
Ashley, FH, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Whay, HR 2005 Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 37:565–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516405775314826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auty, I 1998 The British Horse Society Complete Manual of Stable Management. Kenilworth Press: Addington, UKGoogle Scholar
Bussières, G, Jacques, C, Lainay, O, Beauchamp, G, Lebold, A, Cadoré, J-L, Desmaiziès, L-M, Cuvelliez, SG and Troncy, E 2008 Development of a composite orthopaedic pain scale in horses. Research in Veterinary Science 85: 294–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.10.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, HA, Buckley, P, Friend, MA and McGreevy, PD 2008 The ethological and physiological characteristics of cribbing and weaving horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 68–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collery, L 1974 Observations of equine animals under farm and feral conditions. Equine Veterinary Journal 6: 170–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1974.tb03954.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, JJ, McCall, N, Johnson, S and Davidson, HPB 2005 The short-term effects of increasing meal frequency on stereotyp-ic behaviour of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90:351–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, JJ, McDonald, L and Mills, DS 2000 The effect of increasing visual horizons on stereotypic weaving: implications for the social housing of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 67–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00115-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, JJ and McGreevy, PD 2002 Stereotypic behaviour in the stabled horse: causes, effects and prevention without com-promising horse welfare, In: Waran, N (ed) The Welfare of Horses pp 99–124. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48215-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, HPB 2002 The Impact of Nutrition and Feeding Practices on Equine Behaviour and Welfare. The Havemeyer Foundation Workshop on Horse Behaviour and Welfare: Holar, Iceland. http://research.vet.upenn.edu/HavemeyerEquineBehaviorLabHom ePage/ReferenceLibraryHavemeyerEquineBehaviorLab/Havemeye rWorkshops/HorseBehaviorandWelfare1316June2002/HorseBeh aviorandWelfare2/TheImpactofNutritionandFeedingPracticesonE/tabid/3117/Default.aspxGoogle Scholar
Davidson, N and Harris, P 2002 Nutrition and welfare. In: Waran, N (ed) The Welfare of Horses pp 45–76. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48215-1_3Google Scholar
Field, A 2005 Discovering Statistics using SPSS, Second Edition. Sage Publications Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Flannigan, G and Stooky, JM 2002 Day-time time budgets of pregnant mares housed in tie stalls: a comparison of draft versus light mares. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 125–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00085-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, R, Buckley, P and Cooper, JJ 2009 Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 41: 487–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/095777309X383883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, D, Davidson, HPB and Harris, P 2001 Behavioural enrichment for stabled horses using multiple forages. In: Overall, KL, Mills, DS, Heath, SE and Horwitz, D (eds) Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Veterinary Behavioural Medicine pp 37–38. 7-8 August 2001, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, D, Davidson, HPB and Harris, P 2005 Sensory vari-eties in concentrate diets for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90: 337–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.013Google Scholar
Grimmett, A and Sillence, MN 2005 Calmatives for the excitable horse: a review of L-tryptophan. The Veterinary Journal 170: 24–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.04.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, SW and Jeppesen, LL 2006 Temperament, stereotypies and anticipatory behaviour as measures of welfare in mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99: 172–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P 2005 Nutrition, behaviour and the role of supplements for calming horses: the veterinarians’ dilemma. The Veterinary Journal 170: 10–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, PA 1999 Review of equine feeding and stable manage-ment practices in the UK concentrating on the last decade of the 20th Century. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 28: 46–54Google Scholar
Hastie, PS 2001 The British Horse Society Veterinary Manual. Kenilworth Press: Shrewsbury, UKGoogle Scholar
Hockenhull, J 2010 The epidemiology of behaviour problems and risk fac-tors for poor welfare in UK leisure horses. University of Liverpool: UKGoogle Scholar
Hockenhull, J and Creighton, E 2010 Unwanted oral investigative behaviour in horses: a note on the relationship between mug-ging behaviour, hand-feeding titbits and clicker training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127: 104–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.08.008Google Scholar
Hockenhull, J and Creighton, E 2013 The use of equipment and training practices and the prevalence of owner-reported ridden behaviour problems in UK leisure horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 45: 15–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00567.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, JL, Kronfeld, DS and Meacham, TN 1996 Behaviour of horses is affected by soy lecithin and corn oil in the diet. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1252–1255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosmer, DW and Lemeshow, S 2000 Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471722146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotchkiss, JW, Reid, SWJ and Christley, RM 2007 A survey of horse owners in Great Britain regarding horses in their care. Part 1: horse demographic characteristics and management. Equine Veterinary Journal 39: 294–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516407X177538Google ScholarPubMed
Hothersall, B and Nicol, C 2009 Role of diet and feeding in nor-mal and stereotypic behaviors in horses. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 25: 167–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2009.01.002Google Scholar
Houpt, KA 1986 Stable vices and trailer problems. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2: 623–633Google ScholarPubMed
Houpt, KA 1995 New perspectives on equine stereotypic behav-iour. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 82–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03039.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiley-Worthington, M 1987 The Behaviour of Horses in Relation to Management and Training. JA Allen: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D, Holland, J, Hoffmann, R and Harris, P 1999 Dietary influences on behaviour and stress. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 28: 64Google Scholar
Krzak, WE, Gonyou, HW and Lawrence, LM 1991 Wood chewing by stabled horses: diurnal pattern and effects of exercise. Journal of Animal Science 69: 1053–1058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthersson, N, Hou Nielsen, K, Harris, P and Parkin, TDH 2009a The prevalence and anatomical distribution of equine gas-tric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Veterinary Journal 41: 619–624. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516409X441910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthersson, N, Hou Nielsen, K, Harris, P and Parkin, TDH 2009b Risk factors associated with equine gastric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Veterinary Journal 41: 625–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516409X441929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmkvist, J and Christensen, JW 2007 A note on the effects of a commercial tryptophan product on horse reactivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107: 361–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcella, KL 1988 Common behaviour problems in horses. Equine Practice 10: 22–26Google Scholar
Marsden, D 2002 A new perspective on stereotypic behaviour problems in horses. In Practice 74: 558–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/inpract.24.10.558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, LM, Mills, DS and Cooper, JJ 2002 The use of mirrors for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 159–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00086-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, S and Hemmings, A 2009 A neurologic perspective on equine stereotypy. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 29: 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2008.11.008Google Scholar
McGreevy, PD 2004 Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists. Saunders: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, PD, Cripps, PJ, French, NP, Green, LE and Nicol, CJ 1995 Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 86–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03041.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGreevy, PD, Webster, AJF and Nicol, CJ 2001 Study of the behaviour, digestive efficiency and gut transit times of crib-biting horses. Veterinary Record 148: 592–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.148.19.592CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ 1997 A demographic and epidemiological study of the equine population of Scotland and northern England. University of Glasgow: UKGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS and Clarke, F 2002 Housing, management and welfare. In: Waran, N (ed) The Welfare of Horses pp 77–97. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48215-1_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, BA, McCall, CA, Silverman, SJ and McElhenney, WH 2008 Estimation of saliva production in crib-biting and nor-mal horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 28: 85–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2008.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in cap-tivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, MJ and Eichorn, ES 1996 Effects of intermittent feed dep-rivation, intermittent feed deprivation with ranitidine administration, and stall confinement with ad libitum access to hay on gastric ulcer-ation in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57: 1599–1603Google Scholar
Nicol, CJ 2005 Learning abilities in the horse, In: Mills, DS and McDonnell, SM (eds) The Domestic Horse: The Evolution, Development and Management of its Behaviour pp 169–183. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Pallant, J 2007 SPSS Survival Manual, Third Edition. Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education: Maidenhead, UKGoogle Scholar
Peters, SM, Bleijenberg, EH, Van Dierendonck, MC, Van der Harst, JE and Spruijt, BM 2012 Characterization of antici-patory behaviour in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138: 60–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, SL 1986 Feeding behavior. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2: 609–621Google ScholarPubMed
Rowe, JB, Lees, MJ and Pethick, DW 1994 Prevention of aci-dosis and laminitis associated with grain feeding in horses. Journal of Nutrition Supplement 124: 2742s–2744sGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spruijt, BM, van den Bos, R and Pijlman, FTA 2001 A con-cept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 145–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00204-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, BG and Fidell, LS 2007 Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education Inc: Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
Thorne, JB, Goodwin, D, Kennedy, MJ, Davidson, HPB and Harris, P 2005 Foraging enrichment for individually housed hors-es: practicality and effects on behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 149–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2005.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, MK, White, NA, Lessard, P, Thatcher, CD, Pelzer, KD, Davis, B and Carmel, DK 1997 Prospective study of equine colic risk factors. Equine Veterinary Journal 29: 454–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03158.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Harst, JE and Spruijt, BM 2007 Tools to measure and improve animal welfare: reward-related behaviour. Animal Welfare 16: 67–73Google Scholar
Waring, GH 2003 Horse Behaviour: The Behavioural Traits and Adaptations of Domestic and Wild Horses, Including Ponies. Noyes Publications: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Waters, AJ, Nicol, CJ and French, NP 2002 Factors influencing the development of stereotypic and redirected behaviours in young horses: findings of a 4 year prospective epidemiological study. Equine Veterinary Journal 34: 572–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516402776180241Google ScholarPubMed
Zeitler-Feicht, MH 2004 Horse Behaviour Explained. Manson Publishing: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Zeyner, A, Geißler, C and Dittrich, A 2004 Effects of hay intake and feeding sequence on variables in faeces and faecal water (dry matter, pH value, organic acids, ammonia, buffering capacity) of horses. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 88: 7–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00447.xdiet, horse, management, nutritional supplements, stereotypiesCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed