Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:12:53.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gerbils Prefer Partially Darkened Cages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

FAR Van den Broek ,
H Klompmaker ,
R Bakker  and
A C Beynen
FAR Van den Broek*
Affiliation:
Small Animal Facility, Agricultural University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
H Klompmaker
Affiliation:
Small Animal Facility, Agricultural University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
R Bakker
Affiliation:
Small Animal Facility, Agricultural University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
A C Beynen
Affiliation:
Small Animal Facility, Agricultural University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A test system previously described by Blom et al (1993) was used to investigate the preference of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) with respect to light intensity in their cage, by comparing a standard transparent rodent cage with three cages darkened by either 25, 50 or 75 per cent. The ten animals included in the test spent most of their time in the cages that were darkened by 50 and 75 per cent, thus relatively avoiding the standard cage. Preference was mainly determined by visits longer than 15min and was therefore possibly associated with sleeping behaviour. Food and water consumption were not restricted to the preferred cages.

These results imply that gerbils should be housed preferably in cages that allow sheltering in relatively dark places. For this purpose, placing shelter objects in the cage should be considered.

Keywords

animal welfarecagesgerbilspartially darkened preference test.
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 119 - 123
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Blom, H J M, Van Vorstenbosch, C J A H V, Baumans, V, Hoogervorst, M J C, Beynen, A C and Van Zutphen, LFM 1992 Description and validation of a preference test system to evaluate housing conditions for laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, H J M 1993 Evaluation of Housing Conditions for Laboratory Mice and Rats. The Use of Preference Tests for Studying Choice Behaviour. PhD Thesis, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
Blom, H J M, Baumans, V, Van Vorstenbosch, C J A H V, Van Zutphen, LFM and Beynen, A C 1993 Preference tests with rodents to assess housing conditions. Animal Welfare 2: 81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, M L 1987 Gerbils. In: Poole, T B (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, 6th edition pp 360–376. Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, UKGoogle Scholar
Steel, R G D and Torrie, J H 1981 Principles and Procedures of Statistics, a Biometrical Approach, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill International Book Company: SingaporeGoogle Scholar
Thiessen, D D, lindzey, G, Blum, S, Tucker, A and Fried, H C 1968 Visual behaviour of the mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Psychonomical Science 11: 23–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar