Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:16:23.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Starch digestion site : influence of ruminal and abomasal starch infusion on starch digestion and utilization in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. M. Abramson ,
I. Bruckental ,
L. Lipshitz ,
U. Moalem ,
S. Zamwel  and
A. Arieli
S. M. Abramson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
I. Bruckental
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
L. Lipshitz
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
U. Moalem
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agriculture Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
S. Zamwel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
A. Arieli*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
*
†E-mail address : [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effect of site of starch digestion on glucose metabolism in dairy cows was studied. Four multiparous Israeli-Holstein cows in mid lactation were used in a 4 × 4 Latin-square design. Average body weight of cows was 580 ± 38 kg, and average milk yield was 28 ± 3 kg/day. The cows were fitted with ruminal cannula and flexible T-cannulae in abomasum and ileum. Treatments were as follows : CON (control) : water was infused to the rumen. SR (starch-rumen) : 1.5 kg/day of maize starch solution was infused into the rumen. SA (starch-abomasum) : 1.5 kg/day of maize starch solution was infused into the abomasum. SCA (starch-casein-abomasum) : 500 g/day sodium caseinate and 1.5 kg/day of maize starch solution was infused into the abomasum. Total intake of dry matter (DM), was similar in all treatments and averaged 19.9 kg/day. Total non-structural carbohydrate (TNC) intake averaged in 6.8 kg/day. The average TNC digested in the rumen was 4.95 kg/day for CON and SR cows and 3.34 kg/day for the SA and the SCA cows. The average TNC digestion in the small intestine was 1.18 kg/day for CON and SR cows and 2.41 kg/day for the SA and SCA cows. TNC digestibility in the small intestine was highest for the SCA cows at 0.83 as compared with other treatments. Concentrations of plasma glucose and insulin were similar between treatments. No difference between treatments in total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration in ruminal fluids was observed. However, propionate proportion in total VFA was higher in the SR cows than in other treatments (P < 0.04). Milk yield and composition were not affected by treatments in the present study. It was concluded that the amount of dietary protein in the small intestine has a considerable effect on TNC digestibility. Under conditions of high milk production and high rumen-by-pass TNC flow, efficiency of TNC utilization might be greater since TNC is digested in the small intestine rather than in the rumen.

Keywords

dairy cowsstarchglucosesmall intestine
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 201 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, S. M., Bruckental, I., Zamwel, S. and Arieli, A. 2002. Effect of abomasally infused casein on post-ruminal digestibility of total non-structural carbohydrates and milk yield and composition in dairy cows. Animal Science 74: 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckental, I., Abramson, S. M., Zamwel, S. M., Adin, G. and Arieli, A. 2002. Effect of dietary undegradable crude protein level on total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) digestibility and milk yield and composition of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 76: 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckental, I., Drori, D., Kaim, M., Lehrer, H. and Folman, Y. 1989. Effects of source and level of protein on milk yield and reproductive performance of high-producing primiparous and multiparous dairy cows. Animal Production 48: 319–329.Google Scholar
Bruckental, I., Holtzman, M., Kaim, M., Aharoni, Y., Zamwel, S., Voet, H. and Arieli, H. 2000. Effect of amount of undegradable crude protein in the diet of high-yielding dairy cows on energy balance and reproduction. Livestock Production Science 63: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulomb, J. J. and Favreau, L. 1963. A simple semi-micro method for colorimetric determination of urea. Clinical Chemistry 9: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeyer, D. I. and Graeve de, K.. 1991. Differences in stoichiometry between rumen and hindgut fermentation. In Digestive physiology of the hindgut. Advances in Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 22: 50–61.Google Scholar
Harmon, D. L., Richards, C. J., Swanson, K. C., Howell, J. A., Matthews, J. C., True, A. D., Huntington, G. B., Gahr, S. A. and Russell, R. W. 2000. Infuence of ruminal or postruminal starch on visceral glucose metabolism in steers. In Energy metabolism in animals (ed. Schwalibog, A. and Jacobson, K.), pp. 273–276. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Huntington, G. B. 1997. Starch utilization by ruminants: from basic to the bunk. Journal of Animal Science 75: 852–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, K. F., Glenn, B. P. and Erdman, R. A. 1998. Performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed maize grain harvested and processed differently. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1972–1984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krom, M. D. 1980. Spectrometric determination of ammonia a study of a Bertholt reaction using salicylte and dichloroisicyanurate. The Analyst 105: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, K. R., Baldwin, R. L., Harmon, D. L. VI, Richards, C. J. and Rumpler, W. V. 2000. Infuence of ruminal and post-ruminal starch infusion on energy balance in growing steers. In Energy metabolism in animals (ed. Schwalibog, A. and Jacobson, K.), pp. 385–388. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Matthe, A., Lebzien, P., Hric, I. and Flachowski, G. 2003. Infuence of prolonged adaptation periods on starch degradation in the digestive tract of dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 103: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, H. and Huhtanen, P. 1996. Effect of the ruminal propionate to butyrate on milk yield and blood metabolites in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 851–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, J. A. N., France, J. and Dijkstra, J. 1999a. A review of starch digestion in the lactating dairy cow and proposals for a mechanistic model. 1. Dietary starch characterization and ruminal starch digestion. Journal of Animal Feed Science 8: 291–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, J. A. N., France, J. and Dijkstra, J. 1999b. A review of starch digestion in the lactating dairy cow and proposals for a mechanistic model. 2. Postruminal starch digestion and small intestinal glucose absorption. Journal of Animal Feed Science 8: 451–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, eighth revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oba, M. and Allen, M. S. 2003. Dose-response effects of intraruminal infusion of propionate on feeding behavior of lactating cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 2922–2931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1982. Protein nutrition in ruminants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Owens, F. N., Zinn, R. A. and Kim, Y. K. 1986. Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine. Journal of Animal Science 63: 1634–1648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C. K., Cammell, S. B., Humphries, D. J., Beever, D. E., Sutton, J. D. and Newbold, J. R. 2001. Effect of postpartum starch infusion on milk production and energy metabolism in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 2250–2259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C. K., Sutton, J. D. and Beever, D. E. 1997. Effects of feeding starch to dairy cattle on nutrient availability and production. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Gransworthy, P. C. and Wiseman, J.), pp. 105–134. University of Nottingham Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Richards, C. J., Branco, F., Bohnert, D. W., Huntington, G. B., Macari, M. and Harmon, D. L. 2002. Intestinal starch disappearance increased in steers abomasally infused with starch and protein. Journal of Animal Science 80: 3361–3368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. B. and Chow, J. M. 1993. Another theory for the action of ruminal buffer salts: decreased starch fermentation and propionate production. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 826–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, F. A. P., Santos, J. E. P., Theurer, C. B. and Huber, J. T. 1998. Effects of rumen-degradable protein on dairy cow performance: a 12-year literature review. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 3182–3213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. 1981. Removing and analyzing TNC from plant tissue. Wisconsin Agriculture Experiment Station, report no. R2107, Madison.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. User's guide: statistics, version 6 edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, K., Huntington, G. B. and Glenn, B. P. 1995. Net nutrient fux by visceral tissues of beef steers given abomasal and ruminal infusions of casein and starch. Journal of Animal Science 73: 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, B. and Lewis, A. 1991. Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar