Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:49:52.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some aspects of fertility in purebred and crossbred dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. P. Donald  and
W. S. Russell
H. P. Donald
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
W. S. Russell
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Extract

An account is given of the conception rates (in terms of calves born) following artificial insemination of contemporary purebred and crossbred cattle derived from purebred Friesian, Ayrshire and Jersey stock in an experimental herd. First inseminations were given to 222 purebred and 495 crossbred females approaching first pregnancy; and to 165 purebred and 347 crossbred females approaching second pregnancy. Fitted values for conception rates showed no noteworthy differences for year, season, age of female, or breed of bull. Crossbred females, however, were about 10% more likely to conceive than purebreds. Purebred females mated to bulls of their own breed showed lower conception rates than those mated to bulls of another breed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 465 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Branton, C., Mcdowell, R. E. and Brown, M. A. 1966. Zebu-European crossbreeding as a basis of dairy cattle improvement in the U.S.A. 5th Coop. Ser. Bull. No. 114: 40 pp.Google Scholar
Dickinson, A. G. 1961. The genetical basis of conformation in cattle as revealed by crossbreeding. Z. Tierzücht. ZüchtBiol. 75: 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P., Russell, W. S. and Taylor, St. C. S. 1962. Birth weights of reciprocally crossbred calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 405–412,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1966. Hybrid vigour in beef cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 34: 453–473.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. and McDowell, R. E. 1968. Crossbreeding of dairy cattle in temperate zones: A review of recent studies. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 36: 1–7.Google Scholar
Shannon, P. 1965. Contribution of binomial variation, technician, herds and cows to observations between cow variance of conception rates. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed