Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:00:14.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of beef heifers and non-suckling beef cows to different oestrous synchronization protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

D. Cavestany ,
N. Negrin ,
R. Negrin  and
J. F. Groth
D. Cavestany
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA La Estanzuela, 70000 Colonia, Uruguay
N. Negrin
Affiliation:
Private veterinarians, Uruguay
R. Negrin
Affiliation:
Private veterinarians, Uruguay
J. F. Groth
Affiliation:
Veterinarian and farm manager, Brazil and Uruguay
Get access

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate different oestrous synchronization schemes in beef cattle under range conditions. In experiment 1, 202 heifers averaging 26 months of age were assigned randomly to three treatments: (a) GnRH-PG. (no. = 44) day 0 (D0): injection of GnRH; D7: injection of PGF2α; D0 to D25 oestrous detection (OD) and artificial insemination (AI); (b) OD-PG. (no. = 45) D0 to D4; OD + AI; D5: injection of PGF2α; D5 to D25 OD + AI; and (c)Ovsynch. (no. = 113) D0: injection of GnRH; D7: injection of PGF2α; D9: injection of GnRH and 16 h later AI at fixed time. In experiment 2, 318 non-suckling cows were assigned randomly to three treatments: (a) GnRH-PG. (no. = 106) D0: injection of GnRH; D7: injection of PGF2α; D0 to D25 OD + AI; (b) GnRH-MAP-PG. (no. = 106) D0: injection of a GnRH analogue and insertion of an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 250 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate; D7: injection of PGF2α and sponge withdrawal; D0 to D25 OD + AI; (c) controls. (no. = 106) OD and AI. The experimental period lasted 25 days and, with exception of the Ovsynch treatment, oestrous detection was carried out twice a day (a.m./p.m.) and inseminations performed 12 h later. The pregnancy rates assessed by ultrasonography 30 days after AI were: experiment 1: (a) 30·0%; (b) 28·6% and (c) 62·3% (P < 0·05); experiment 2: (a) 60·2%; (b) 57·8% and (c) 45·5% (P < 0·05). It is concluded that in heifers and non-suckling cows, oestrous synchronization treatments result in higher pregnancy rates. In non-suckling cows, the addition of a progestagen did not improve the response.

Keywords

beef cattleGnRHoestrusprostaglandins
Type
Reproduction
Information
Animal Science , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 547 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberio, R. H., Aller, J., Quinteros, R., Ferre, L. and Meluci, L. 1999. Momento de aplicación y dosis del benzoato de estradiol al final de un tratamiento con progestágenos sobre el celo y la fertilidad. 3er Congreso de Reproducción Animal, Córdoba, Argentina, p. 182.Google Scholar
Beal, W. E., Good, G. A. and Peterson, L. A. 1984. Estrus synchronization and pregnancy rates in cyclic and noncyclic beef cows and heifers treated with Synchro-mate B or norgestomet and alfaprostol. Theriogenology 22: 59–66.Google Scholar
Brown, L. N., Odde, K. G., King, M. E., LeFever, D. G. and Neubauer, C. J. 1988. Comparison of melengestrol acetate-prostaglandin F2alpha to Synchro-mate B for estrus synchronization in beef heifers. Theriogenology 30: 1–12.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S.D. and Galligan, D. T. 1993. Reproductive programs in dairy herds. Proceedings of the central veterinary conference, Kansas City, MO, vol. 1, pp. 161–178.Google Scholar
Geary, T. W., Whittier, J. C., Downing, E. R., LeFever, D. G., Silcox, R. W., Holland, M. D., Nett, T. M. and Niswender, G. D. 1998. Pregnancy rates of postpartum beef cows that were synchronized using Syncro-mate-B or the Ovsynch protocol. Journal of Animal Science 76: 1523–1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutknecht, G. D., Cornette, J. C. and Pharris, B. B. 1969. Antifertility properties of prostaglandin F2α. Biology of Reproduction 1: 367–371.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. K., Berardinelli, J. G., Han, D. K., Ansotegui, R. P. and Moody, E. L. 1985. Oestrous synchronisation systems involving prostaglandin F2∝ and progesterone pretreatment in beef heifers. Theriogenology 25: 249–261.Google Scholar
Inskeep, E. K. 1973. Potential uses of prostaglandins in control of reproductive cycles of domestic animals. Journal of Animal Science 36: 1149–1157.Google Scholar
Kerr, D. R., McGowan, M. R., Carroll, C. L. and Baldock, F. C. 1991. Evaluation of three estrus synchronization regimens for use in extensively managed Bos indicus and Bos indicus/taurus heifers in northern Australia. Theriogenology 36: 129–141.Google Scholar
King, M. E., Daniel, M. J., Teague, L. D., Schutz, D. N. and Odde, K. G. 1994. Comparison of timed insemination with insemination at oestrous following synchronisation of oestrous with an MGA-prostaglandin system in beef heifers. Theriogenology 42: 79–88.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, J. W., Seguin, B. E., Sterflung, N. J., Chenault, J. R., Thatcher, W. W., Vicent, K. J. and Loyancano, A. F. 1974. Fertility of cattle following PGF2∝ injection. Journal of Animal Science 38: 964–967.Google Scholar
Lucy, M. C., Savio, J. D., Badinga, L., De la Sota, R. L. and Thatcher, W. W. 1992. Factors that affect ovarian follicular dynamics in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3615–3626.Google Scholar
Martinez, M. F., Adams, G. P., Bergfelt, D. R., Kastelic, J. P. and Mapletoft, R. J. 1999. Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers. Animal Reproduction Science 57: 23–33.Google Scholar
Moreira, F., De la Sota, R. L., Díaz, T. and Thatcher, W. W. 2000. Effect of day of estrous cycle at the initiation of a timed insemination protocol on reproductive responses in dairy heifers. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1568–1576.Google Scholar
Roche, J. F., Austin, E. J., Ryan, M., O´Rourke, M., Mihm, M. and Diskin, M. G. 1999. Regulation of follicle waves to maximize fertility in cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 54: 61–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Rowson, L., Tervit, R. and Brand, A. 1972. The use of prostaglandins for synchronization of oestrus in cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 29: 145–148.Google Scholar
Schmitt, É. J. P., Diaz, T. C., Drost, M. and Thatcher, W. W. 1994. Use of a GnRH-agonist for a timed-insemination protocol in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 72: (suppl. 1 Journal of Dairy Science 77: (suppl. 1) 292.Google Scholar
Short, R. E., Bellows, R. A., Staigmiller, R. B., Berardinelli, J. G. and Custer, E. E. 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and fertility in postpartum beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68: 799–816.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1995. SAS release 6·11. SAS Institute Inc., Campus Drive, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. S., Smith, M. W., Jaeger, J. R., Corah, L. R. and LeFever, D. G. 1996. Detection of estrus by visual observation and radiotelemetry in peripubertal, estrus-synchronized beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 74: 729–735.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. S., Thompson, K. E., Forbes, W. L., Lamb, G. C., Grieger, D. M. and Corah, L. R. 2000. Synchronizing estrus and (or) ovulation in beef cows after combinations of GnRH, norgestomet, and prostaglandin F2á with or without timed insemination. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1747–1758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twagiramungu, H., Guilbault, L. A. and Dufour, J. J. 1995. Synchronisation of ovarian follicular waves with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to increase the precision of estrus in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 73: 3141–3151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twagiramungu, H., Guilbault, L. A., Proulx, J., Villeneuve, P. and Dufour, J. J. 1992. Influence of an agonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (buserelin) on estrus synchronization and fertility in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1904–1910.Google Scholar
Vizcarra, J. A. and Wettemann, R. P. 1996. Reproducibility, repeatability and degree of expertise required to assess body condition score in beef cattle. The Professional Animal Scientist 12: 28–31.Google Scholar