Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:42:42.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the performance of young pigs given maize-based diets in different physical forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. F. Wu  and
M. F. Fuller
J. F. Wu
Affiliation:
Pig Research Institute, Taiwan, P.O. Box 23, Chunan, Miaoli, Taiwan
M. F. Fuller
Affiliation:
Pig Research Institute, Taiwan, P.O. Box 23, Chunan, Miaoli, Taiwan
Get access

Summary

The experiment compared the performance of pigs from 11 to 56 days of age when given diets based on maize which had been rolled, or ground through coarse, medium or fine screens, or which were made with maize which had been ground through a medium screen and which were then pelleted or pelleted and crumbled. All diets were given ad libitum.

From 11 days to weaning at 28 days, little feed was eaten and there were no significant effects of the treatments. From 29 to 35 days, daily gain and feed conversion were best on the fine, medium and pelleted diets. From 36 to 56 days, pellets and crumble gave the best performance. There were no significant differences between treatments in the incidence of scouring.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 317 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lawrence, T. L. J. 1967. High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. 2. The effect of cereal preparation on the performance of pigs fed diets containing high levels of maize, sorghum and barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69: 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahan, D. C., Pickett, R. A., Perry, T. W., Curtin, T. M., Featherston, W. R. and Beeson, W. M. 1966. Influence of various nutritional factors and physical form of feed on esophagogastric ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 1019–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, C. V., Reimann, E. M., Hoekstra, W. G., Kowalczyk, T.Benevenga, N. J. and Grummer, R. H. 1970. Effect of dietary particle size on lesion development and on the contents of various regions of the swine stomach. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 911–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, R. A., Fugate, W. H., Harrington, R. B., Perry, T. W. and Curtin, T. M. 1969. Influence of feed preparation and number of pigs per pen on performance and occurrence of esophagogastric ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 28: 837–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimann, E. M., Maxwell, C. V., Kowalczyk, T., Benevenga, N. J., Grummer, R. H. and Hoekstra, W. G. 1968. Effect of fineness of grind of corn on gastric lesions and contents of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 992–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schoubroek, F., Couke, L. and Van Spaendonck, R. 1971. The quantitative effecc of pelleting feed on the performance of piglets and fattening pigs. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 41: 1–9.Google Scholar