Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T11:22:49.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and carcass performance of British Landrace pigs heterozygous at the halothane locus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. P. Simpson  and
A. J. Webb
S. P. Simpson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
A. J. Webb
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

The effects of the halothane gene on growth and performance were estimated from British Landrace positive and negative selection lines and crosses between the lines. A total of 214 full-sib pairs were performance tested from 25 to 85 kg live weight on either ad libitum or scale (0·69 g/g ad libitum food intake) feeding. Half-sides of 45 carcasses were fully dissected.

In the crosses, growth and performance did not depend on whether the sire or the dam was from the positive line. Carcass length, conformation score, eye muscle area and incidence of pale, soft, exudative meat (PSE) were all intermediate in the crosses. Given food ad libitum, the crosses had increased appetite and growth rates which resulted in increased backfat depths. However, in the fully dissected carcasses, the crosses were intermediate for lean proportion. Although the crosses gave a net economic advantage, the incidence of PSE may be unacceptably high for commercial exploitation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 503 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andresen, E., Jensen, P. and Barton-Gade, P. 1981. The porcine Hal locus: A major locus exhibiting overdominance. Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie 98: 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton-Gade, P. 1984. Influence of halothane genotype on meat quality in pigs subject to various pre-slaughter treatments. Commission of the European Communities Seminar on Meat Quality, Bristol, paper 1:3.Google Scholar
Coniffe, D. and Moran, M. A. 1972. Double sampling with regression in comparative studies of carcass composition. Biometrics 28: 1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikelenboom, G., Minkema, D., Van Eldick, P. and Sybesma, W. 1980. Performance of Dutch Landrace pigs with different genotypes for the halothane-induced malignant hyperthermia syndrome. Livestock Production Science 7: 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. and Barton-Gade, P. A. 1985. Performance and carcass characteristics of pigs with known genotypes for halothane susceptibility. European Association for Animal Production Publication, No. 33, pp. 80–87.Google Scholar
Luescher, U., Schneider, A. and Jucker, H. 1979. Genetics of the halothane sensitivity and change of performance, carcass and meat quality traits, induced by selection against halothane sensitivity. 30th Annual Meeting European Association for Animal Production, Harrogate, paper MP2.11.Google Scholar
Lundstrom, K., Rundgren, M., Edfors-Lilja, I., Essen-Gustavsson, B., Nyberg, L. and Gahne, B. 1985. Effect of halothane genotype on immune response, muscle characteristics, meat quality and performance — a within litter comparison. 36th Annual Meeting, European Association for Animal Production, Kallithea, paper MP5.18.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., Schworer, D. and Blum, J. 1980. [Production and reproduction traits of Swiss Landrace pigs in relation to their genotype of halothane sensitivity]. 31st Annual Meeting European Association for Animal Production, Munich, paper GP3.9.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. P., Webb, A. J. and Wilmut, I. 1986. Performance of British Landrace pigs selected for high and low incidence of halothane sensitivity. 1. Reproduction. Animal Production 43: 485–492.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1982. Estimates of trends in the halothane gene in pigs stocks with selection. Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 99: 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. and Webb, A. J. 1981. Effects of major genes on animal breeding strategies. Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 98: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. C. and Lesser, D. 1982. An economic assessment of pale, soft exudative musculature in the fresh and cured pig carcass. Animal Production 34: 291–299.Google Scholar
Southwood, O. I., Simpson, S. P. and Webb, A. J. 1988a. Reaction to halothane anaesthesia among heterozygotes at the halothane locus in British Landrace pigs. Génétique, Sélection, Evolution 20: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southwood, O. I., Simpson, S. P., Curran, M. K. and Webb, A. J. 1988b. Frequency of the halothane gene in the British Landrace and Large White pigs. Animal Production 46: 97–102.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. and Simpson, S. P. 1986. Performance of British Landrace pigs selected for high and low incidence of halothane sensitivity. 2. Growth and carcass traits. Animal Production 43: 493–503.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J., Carden, A. E., Smith, C. and Imlah, P. 1982. Porcine stress syndrome in pig breeding. Proceedings of 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid, Vol. 5, pp. 588–608. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.Google Scholar