Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:52:41.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food intake and live-weight gain comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers on a high plane of nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Rogerson ,
H. P. Ledger  and
G. H. Freeman
A. Rogerson
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization and East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya
H. P. Ledger
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization and East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya
G. H. Freeman
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization and East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya
Get access

Extract

1. The voluntary dry-matter and water intakes of indigenous and exotic cattle on high plane rations have been compared under similar conditions of management.

2. At similar live weights, exotic cattle have a much higher feed intake relative to maintenance than indigenous cattle.

3. Water intake was closely related to dry-matter intake, irrespective of live weight, and varied only very slightly between the two types of cattle.

4. Exotic cattle were more than twice as efficient as indigenous cattle in converting feed into live-weight gain. It is suggested that this is largely a reflection of the increased feed intake, relative to maintenance requirements.

5. Stage of maturity, degree of fatness and their relation to conversion efficiency are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 373 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1964. The efficiency of feed conversion by livestock. J. R. agric. Soc. 125: 87–99.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. and Davidson, J. L. 1966. The voluntary intake of food by sheep and cattle in relation to the energy requirements for maintenance. Anim. Prod. 8: 75–83.Google Scholar
French, M. H. 1940. The comparative digestive powers of zebu and high-grade European cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30: 503–510.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P. 1965. The body and carcass composition of East African ruminants. 1. The composition of ‘Improved Boran’ Bos indicus steer carcasses. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65: 261–284.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. D., Hungate, R. E., MacGregor, A. and Hungate, D. P. 1960. Experiments on rumen retention time, fermentation rate and dry matter digestibility in zebu and European-type cattle on a grass hay ration. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 54: 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar