Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:23:14.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of nutrient density and group size on the performance of growing and finishing pigs given food using single-space feeders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

J. V. O’Doherty  and
M. P. McKeon
J. V. O’Doherty
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Production, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
M. P. McKeon
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Production, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

A 2 ✕ 2 ✕ 3 factorial arrangement of treatments used 522 boars to examine the main effects and interactions of season (spring v. summer), number of pigs per pen with a single-space feeder (13 or 16 pigs per pen with a singlespace feeder; 0·78 m2 per pig v. 0·65 m2 floor space per pig) and nutrient density of the diet (12·5 g lysine per kg and 14·0 MJ digestible energy (DE) per kg from 38 kg to slaughter (high), 12·5 g lysine per kg and 14·0 MJ DE per kg during the growing phase and 10·0 g lysine per kg and 13·6 MJ DE per kg during the finishing phase (split) and 10 g lysine per kg and 13·6 MJ DE per kg from 38 kg to slaughter (low)) on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing pigs. The smaller group of pigs had a higher food intake during the grower-finisher period than the high stocked pigs (P < 0·01). The pigs had a higher lysine intake in the spring than in the summer months (P < 0·05). Differences in daily food intake for the smaller group of pigs were reflected in increased growth rate during the grower-finisher period (P < 0·001). However these pigs had a poorer food conversion ratio during the grower-finisher period (P < 0·05) than the bigger group of pigs. The pigs offered the high specification and split-fed diets had better growth rate (P < 0·05) than the pigs given the low specification diet during the grower and finisher period. There was a significant two-way interaction in growth rate between dietary treatment and season during the finisher period (P < 0·01). The pigs given the high specification diet had a better growth rate (P < 0·001) than the pigs given the low diets during the summer months. However, the high specification diet depressed growth rate during the spring months (P < 0·05). The pigs had a lower backfat and higher lean meat in the summer than in the spring months (P < 0·05).

Keywords

group sizenutrient densityperformancepigs
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 281 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis, 13th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Baker, D. H. 1986. Problems and pitfalls in animal experiments designed to establish dietary requirements for essential nutrients. Journal of Nutrition 116: 2339–2349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brumm, M. C. and Miller, P. S. 1996. Response of pigs to space allocation and diets varying in nutrient density. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2730–2737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G. 1988. Nutritional constraints to lean tissue accretion in farm animals. Nutrition Research Reviews 1: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G. and Taverner, M. R. 1986. The effects of dietary fibre, source of fat and dietary energy content on the voluntary energy intake and performance of growing pigs. Animal Production 43: 327–333.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1985. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal Production 40: 497–503.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. 1994. Feeding new genotypes: establishing amino acid/energy requirements. In Principles of pig science (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Wiseman, J. and Varley, M. A.), pp. 123–140. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Close, W. H., Mount, L. E. and Brown, D. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig. II. Growth rate, including protein and fat deposition. British Journal of Nutrition 40: 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture and Food. 1994. Pig carcass dressing specification. SI 216. Department of Agriculture and Food, Ireland.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. S., Arenston, B. E. and Mente, G. A. 1998 Effect of protein levels and space allocation on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76: 814–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S. A., Armsby, A. W. and Spechter, H. H. 1988. Effects of floor area allowance on performance of growing pigs kept on fully slatted floors. Animal Production 46: 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, G. D., Becker, D. E., Cox, J. L., Harmon, B. G. and Jensen, A. H. 1966. Effects of floor space allowance and number per group on performance of growing-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 25: 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J. D., Biehl, R. R. and Baker, D. H. 1995. Ideal digestible lysine level for early and late-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 73: 773–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, W. and Walker, N. 1994. Response of pigs to dietary energy and protein with particular reference to the early finishing period. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 33: 149–155.Google Scholar
Iwaki, K., Nimura, N., Hiraga, Y., Kinoshita, T., Takeda, K. and Ogura, H. 1987. Amino acid analysis by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 407: 273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. H., Baker, D. H., Harmon, B. G. and Woods, D. M. 1973. Response of growing-finishing male and female swine to floor space allowance on partially and totally slotted floors. Journal of Animal Science 37: 629–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornegay, E. T., Lindemann, M. D. and Ravindran, V. 1993a. Effects of dietary lysine levels on performance and immune response of weanling pigs housed at two floor space allowances. Journal of Animal Science 71: 552–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornegay, E. T., Meldrum, J. B. and Chickering, W. R. 1993b. Influence of floor space allowance and dietary selenium and zinc on growth performance and clinical pathology. Measurements and liver enzymes, and adrenal weights of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 3185-3198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornegay, E. T. and Notter, D. R. 1984. Effects of floor space and number of pigs per pen on performance. Pig News and Information 5: 23–33.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1991. The feedingstuffs regulations 1991. Statutory instrument no. 2840, 9.76. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Morrow, A. T. S. and Walker, N. 1994. The behavioural and production responses of finishing pigs to increasing workload to obtain food ad libitum from hopper feeders. Animal Production 59: 125–129.Google Scholar
Moser, R. L., Cornelius, S. G., Pettigrew, J. E., Hanke, H. E. Jr and Hagen, C. D. 1985. Response of growing-finishing pigs to decreasing floor space allowance and (or) virginiamycin in diet. Journal of Animal Science 61: 337–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myer, R. O. and Bucklin, R. A. 1995. Influence of a hot and humid rearing environment and plane of nutrition on performance and carcass lean content of growing-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 73: (suppl. l) 182 (abstr.).Google Scholar
NCR-42 Committee on Swine Nutrition. 1993. An attempt to counteract growth depression from overcrowding of finishing pigs with a nutrient-dense diet. Journal of Animal Science 71: (suppl. l) 179 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. L. and Lawrence, A. B. 1993a. Effect of group size on the behaviour and performance of growing pigs using computerised single space feeders. Pig News and Information 14: 127N–129N.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. L. and Lawrence, A. B. 1993b. Effect of group size on the behaviour and performance of growing pigs. In Manipulating pig production IV (ed. Batterham, E. S.) pp. 85–87. Australasian Pig Science Association, Attwood, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Plagge, J. G. 1989. Water consumption of fattening pigs. Praktijk-Onderzoek Varkenshonderij, Rosmalen 3: 16–18.Google Scholar
Randolph, J. H., Cromwell, G. L., Stahly, T. S. and Kratzer, D. D. 1981. Effects of group size and space allowance on performance and behaviour of swine. Journal of Animal Science 53: 922–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. Statistical analysis systems. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Van Lunen, T. A. and Cole, D. J. A. 1996. The effect of lysine/digestible energy ratio on growth performance and nitrogen deposition of hybrid boars, gilts and castrated male pigs. Animal Science 63: 465–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verstegen, M. W. A., Close, W. H., Start, I. B. and Mount, L. E. 1973. The effect of environmental temperature and plane of nutrition on heat loss, energy retention and deposition of protein and fat in groups of growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 30: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahlstrom, R. C. and Libal, G. W. 1983. Compensatory responses of swine following protein insufficiency in growing diets. Journal of Animal Science 56: 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. 1991. The effects on performance and behaviour of number of growing pigs per mono-place feeder. Animal Feed Science and Technology 35: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N. H., Stahly, T. S. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1997. Effect of level of chronic immune system activation on the growth and dietary lysine needs of pigs fed from 6 to 112 kg. Journal of Animal Science 75: 2481–2496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. R. and Khajerern, S. 1973. Starter protein nutrition and compensatory respones in swine. Journal of Animal Science 36: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar