Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:05:37.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary supplementation of sows with quillaja saponins during gestation on colostrum composition and performance of piglets suckled

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. E. Llsley  and
H. M. Miller
S. E. Llsley*
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
H. M. Miller
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
†E-mail: [email protected]. co. uk
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of dietary saponins, extracted from the plant Quillaja saponaria, on the concentrations of immunoglobulins in sow colostrum and milk, and additionally to observe any effect on piglet performance. Twenty-two sows were allocated to each of two dietary treatments on day 72 of gestation, balancing for parity, fatness and past reproductive performance. Treatments were : control (C) and supplemented (Q; 2.5 g saponin per day as a top-dressing). Sows received 2.5 kg food once per day throughout gestation. Between days 72 and 93 of gestation Q sows received a saponin top-dressing as described. After day 93, all sows were given the same diet and managed in an identical manner. Colostrum samples were taken from all sows at farrowing on delivery of the first piglet then 4, 8, 24 and 72 h later and again on day 21 of lactation. A group of eight sows from each treatment were also blood sampled at farrowing, day 3 and day 21 of lactation. Concentrations of immunoglobulins IgG and IgA in the colostrum, milk and blood were not affected by sow treatment during gestation at any sampling point. Fat, lactose and cell counts were also similar across treatments in colostrum and milk. Protein tended to be higher in milk on day 3 but lower on day 21 (P < 0.1) in Q sows. Piglet performance was not affected by sow treatment during week 1 of lactation. However pigs suckling Q sows grew more slowly between days 8 to 14 (P < 0.05) and days 15 to 21 (P < 0.1). Q sows also had fewer stillborn piglets in their litters at farrowing (7.67 v. 13.25%, P < 0.05, s.e. = 1.93). It is concluded that dietary quillaja saponin given during this time period has no influence on sow lacteal immunoglobulin secretions. However an adverse effect on performance of the sucking piglet was observed, the reasons for which are unclear, but may be related to reduced milk protein concentrations. Dietary quillaja saponin during gestation does however appear to reduce the incidence of stillborn piglets.

Keywords

immunoglobulinslactationQuillajasows
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourne, F. J. and Curtis, J. 1973a. Half lives of immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM in the serum of newborn pigs. Immunology 24:147–155.Google Scholar
Bourne, F. J. and Curtis, J. 1973b. The transfer of immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM from serum to colostrum and milk in the sow. Immunology 24: 157–162.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R. D. and Kensinger, R. S. 1999. Metabolic precursors for milk synthesis. In The lactating sow (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Moughan, P. J. and Schrama, J. W.), pp. 71–96. Wageningen Press.Google Scholar
Cline, J. L., Fisher, B. A., Trottier, N. L., Walker, R. D. and Easter, R. A. 1996. Effect of feeding MICRO-AID on stillbirths, pre-weaning mortality, blood oxygen values of piglets and blood urea nitrogen in sows. Journal of Animal Science 74: (suppl. 1) 189 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Hoshi, S., Ushino, A., Saito, N., Kusanagi, K. I., Ihara, T. and Ueda, S. 1999. Comparison of adjuvants with respect to serum IgG antibody response in orally immunised chickens. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Disease 22: 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostettmann, K. and Marston, A. 1995. Saponin. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, I., Ismail, A. M. and Cheeke, P. R. 1996. Effects of feeding Yucca schidigera extract in diets of varying crude protein and urea contents on growth performance and cecum and blood urea and ammonia concentration of rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 51: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IIsley, S. E., Miller, H. M., Greathead, H. M. R. and Kamel, C. 2003. Plant extracts as supplements for lactating sows: effects on piglet performance, sow food intake and diet digestibility. Animal Science 77: 247–254.Google Scholar
IIsley, S. E., Miller, H. M. and Kamel, C. 2004. Effect of dietary Quillaja saponin and Curcumin on the performance and immune status of weaned piglets. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 2004, p. 57.Google Scholar
Johansson, M. and Lovgren-Bengtsson, K. 1999. Iscoms with different Quillaja saponin components differ in their immunomodulating activities. Vaccine 17: 2894–2900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klobasa, F., Werhahn, E. and Butler, J. E. 1981. Regulation of humoral immunity in the piglet by immunoglobulins of maternal origin. Research in Veterinary Science 31: 195–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klobasa, F., Werhahn, E. and Butler, J.E. 1987. Composition of sow milk during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 64: 1458–1466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krakowski, L., Krzyzanowski, J., Wrona, Z., Kostro, K. and Siwicki, A.K. 2002. The influence of non-specific immunostimulation of pregnant sows on the immunological value of colostrum. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 87: 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 2003. Pig yearbook 2003. MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Pluske, J.R. and Dong, G.Z. 1999. Factors influencing the utilisation of colostrum and milk. In The lactating sow (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Moughan, P. J. and Schrama, J. W.), pp. 45–70. Wageningen Press.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y., Phaneuf, L. and Dunlop, R. 1991. Physiology of small and large animals. B. C. Decker Inc., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Salmon, H. 1999. The mammary gland and neonate mucosal immunity. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 72:143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheline, R. R. 1978. Mammalian metabolism of plant xenobiotics. Academic Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sjolander, A., Van't Land, B. and Lovegren-Bengtsson, K. 1997. Iscoms containing purified Quillaja saponins upregulate both Th-1 and Th-2 like immune responses. Cell Immunology 177: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences. 2003. SPSS 11·5. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Tuchscherer, M., Puppe, B., Tuchscherer, A. and Tiemann, U. 2000. Early identification of neonates at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival. Theriogenology 54: 371–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, R., Arthaud, L. and Newbold, C. 1994. Influence of Yucca shidigera extract on ruminal ammonia concentrations and ruminal microorganisms. Applied Enviromental Microbiology 60: 1762–;1767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D. L. 1980. Immunological functions of the mammary gland and its secretion – comparative review. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 33: 403–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed