Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:32:20.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy of predicting milk yield from alternative milk recording schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. P. Berry ,
V. E. Olori ,
A. R. Cromie ,
R. F. Veerkamp ,
M. Rath  and
P. Dillon
D. P. Berry*
Affiliation:
Dairy Production Department, Teagasc, Moorepark Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
V. E. Olori
Affiliation:
Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, Shinagh House, Bandon, Co. Cork., Ireland
A. R. Cromie
Affiliation:
Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, Shinagh House, Bandon, Co. Cork., Ireland
R. F. Veerkamp
Affiliation:
Animal Resources Development, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR, PO Box 65, AB Lelystad 8200, The Netherlands
M. Rath
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
P. Dillon
Affiliation:
Dairy Production Department, Teagasc, Moorepark Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effect of reducing the frequency of official milk recording and the number of recorded samples per test-day on the accuracy of predicting daily yield and cumulative 305-day yield was investigated. A control data set consisting of 58 210 primiparous cows with milk test-day records every 4 weeks was used to investigate the influence of reduced milk recording frequencies. The accuracy of prediction of daily yield with one milk sample per test-day was investigated using 41 874 testday records from 683 cows. Results show that five or more test-day records taken at 8-weekly intervals (A8) predicted 305-day yield with a high level of accuracy. Correlations between 305-day yield predicted from 4-weekly recording intervals (A4) and from 8-weekly intervals were 0.99, 0.98 and 0.98 for milk, fat and protein, respectively. The mean error in estimating 305-day yield from the A8 scheme was 6.8 kg (s.d. 191 kg) for milk yield, 0.3 kg (s.d. 10 kg) for fat yield, and −0.3 kg (s.d. 7 kg) for protein yield, compared with the A4 scheme. Milk yield and composition taken during either morning (AM) or evening (PM) milking predicted 24-h yield with a high degree of accuracy. Alternating between AM and PM sampling every 4 weeks predicted 305-day yield with a higher degree of accuracy than either all AM or all PM sampling. Alternate AM-PM recording every 4 weeks and AM + PM recording every 8 weeks produced very similar accuracies in predicting 305-day yield compared with the official AM + PM recording every 4 weeks.

Keywords

milk recordingmilk yield
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S. M. Mao, I. L. and Gill, J. L. 1989. Effect of frequency and spacing of sampling on accuracy and precision of estimating total lactation milk yield and characteristics of the lactation curve. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2387–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, J. and Duda, J. 1997. Reliability of new methods in milk recording. Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Wien, paper C5 7.Google Scholar
Bayley, N. D., Liss, R. M. and Stallard, J. E. 1952. A comparison of bimonthly and quarterly testing with monthly testing for estimating dairy cattle production. Journal of Dairy Science 35: 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, O. M. and Searle, S. H. 1961. Use of bimonthly records in herd testing. Journal of Dairy Science 44: 1335–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, F. N. and McDaniel, B. T. 1970. Single-milking yields versus 24-hour yields for estimating lactation milk production by the test interval method. Journal of Dairy Science 53: 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, R. E., Goodwin, M. M., Morrison, R. A. and Shaw, A. O. 1952. Lactation studies. IV. Accuracy of different methods of estimating lactation yields. Journal of Dairy Science 35: 977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, R. W. and Wadell, L. H. 1970. Sources of variation affecting ratio factors for estimating total daily milk yield from individual milkings. Journal of Dairy Science 53: 1430–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamed, M. K. 1995. Accuracy of bimonthly and trimonthly milk recording systems for dairy cattle in Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor 33: 669–679.Google Scholar
International Committee for Animal Recording. 2002. Position of milk recording; methods and organisation: 2000. www. icar. org. yearly. htmlGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Reents, R., Reinhardt, F. and Kuwan, K. 2000. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a. m. -p. m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 2672–2682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, B. T. 1969. Accuracy of sampling procedures for estimating lactation yields: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 52: 1742–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, B., O'Connell, J. and Meaney, W. J. 1998. Short-term effect of milking interval on milk production, composition and quality. Milchwissenschaft 53: 123–126.Google Scholar
Olori, V. E. and Galesloot, P. J. B. 1999. Projection of partial lactation records and calculation of 305-day yields in the Republic of Ireland. Interbull Bulletin 22: 149–154.Google Scholar
Olori, V. E. and Wickham, B. 2001. Coping with unusual lactation records in the light of the 2001 foot and mouth disease scare in Ireland. Interbull Bulletin 27: 123–127.Google Scholar
Pander, B. L., Thompson, R. and Hill, W. G. 1993. The effect of increasing the interval between recordings on genetic parameters of test day yields of British Holstein-Friesian heifers. Animal Production 56: 159–164.Google Scholar
Philipsson, J. 1981. Genetic aspects of female fertility in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 8: 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poly, J. and Poutous, M. 1968. Alternate monthly milk recording. I. Accuracy of recording monthly and every second month, for a 305-day milk period. Dairy Science Abstracts 30: 454.Google Scholar
Porzio, G. 1953. A new method of milk recording. Animal Breeding Abstracts 21: 1659.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 2002. User's guide, version 8 0 0 edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R., Jamrozik, J., Dorp van, R., Kelton, D. F. and Lazenby, D. W. 2000. Estimating daily yields of cows from different milking schemes. Livestock Production Science 65: 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R. and Rennie, J. C. 1976. AM-PM testing for estimating lactation yields. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56: 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjaunja, L. O. 1986. Day-to-day variation in milk yield, milk composition and somatic cell count. International Committee for Recording the Productivity of Milk Animals (ICRPMA), 25th session.Google Scholar
Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Sjaunja, L. O., Bertilsson, J. and Wiktorsson, H. 1997. Use of regular milking records versus daily records for nutrition and other kinds of management. Livestock Production Science 48: 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trappmann, W., Schwaer, P., Pauw, R. and Tholen, E. 1998. Alternating milk recording as an alternative to the A4 milk recording method. Züchtungskunde 70: 85–95.Google Scholar
Wigans, G. R. 1986. Estimating daily yields of cows milked threetimes. a-day. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2935–2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar