Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:37:22.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some aspects of the energy and nitrogen metabolism of boars, gilts and barrows given diets containing different concentrations of protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. W. Holmes ,
J. R. Carr  and
G. Pearson
C. W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Department, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
J. R. Carr
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Department, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
G. Pearson
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Department, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Four diets which varied in crude protein concentration from 140 to 240 g crude protein per kg dry matter were given to gilts in experiment 1, and two diets containing 140 and 200 g crude protein per kg dry matter were given t o boars and barrows in experiment 2. Two levels of feeding were offered in both experiments and energy and nitrogen balances were measured at 30 and 90 kg live weight in both experiments, and also at 50 kg in experiment 1. Nitrogen intake had a small negative influence on energy retention by pigs of all sexes, an effect which was independent of the large positive effect of metabolizable energy intake. The ratio of metabolizable energy concentration to digestible energy concentration decreased in association with increases in crude protein concentration of the diets. The results show that comparisons of feeds on the basis of their digestible energy concentrations would lead to overestimation of the energy values of those containing high protein concentrations. Live weight (or age) and metabolizable energy intake exerted positive influences on the amount of energy retained per kg live-weight gain, whereas nitrogen intake exerted a negative influence. Values for energy retained per kg live-weight gain predicted from multiple regression equations, together with calculated values for maintenance and net efficiency, were used to predict the energy retention and growth rate of pigs in various circumstances.

Nitrogen retention increased in association with increases in nitrogen intake for pigs of all sexes at 30 kg live weight; there was also a corresponding increase for boars at 90kg live weight, but not for gilts or barrows at this weight. Boars retained more nitrogen than did barrows at 30 and 90 kg live weight only if given the diet with the higher concentration of protein.

Metabolizable energy intake appeared to exert a small positive influence on the nitrogen retention by pigs of all sexes at 90kg live weight; however, it appeared to have no influence on nitrogen retention by pigs at 30kg live weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 279 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, J. L. and Grifiths, D. A. 1975. Effects of live-weight and energy intake on nitrogen balance and total N requirement of lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 33: 399–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., and Boyne, A. W. 1978. The estimation of the nutritive value of feeds as energy sources for ruminants and the derivation of feeding systems. J. agric. Sci., Camh. 90: 47 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breirem, K, 1935. Energy metabolism in swine. Beretn. Forsøigslab., No. 162.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 441–443. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig. 3. The efficiency of energy utilization for maintenance and growth. Br. J. Nutr. 40: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, W. H., Mount, L. E. and Brown, D. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig.2. Growth rate, including protein and fat deposition. Br. J. Nutr. 40: 423–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, R., Lodge, G. A. and Lewis, D. 1972. Influence of energy and protein concentration in the diet on the performance of growing pigs. 1. Response to protein intake on a high-energy diet. Anim. Prod. 14: 35–46.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. and Boyne, A. W. 1972. The effects of environmental temperature on the growth and metabolism of pigs given different amounts of food. 2. Energy metabolism. Br. J. Nutr. 28: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, C. W., Christensen, Robyn, Carr, J. R. and Pearson, G. 1980. Some aspects of the energy metabolism of growing pigs fed diets containing different concentrations of protein. Proc. 8th Symp. Energy Metabolism, Cambridge, 1979. In press.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and McLean, N. R. 1974. The effect of low ambient temperatures on the energy metabolism of sows. Anim. Prod. 19: 1–12.Google Scholar
Just Neilson, A. 1980. Influences of diet composition on site of absorption and efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy in growing pigs. Proc. 8th Symp. Energy Metabolism, Cambridge, 1979. In press.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. J., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1975. Energy values in pig nutrition. I. The relationship between digestible energy, metabolizable energy and total digestible nutrient values of a range of feedstuffs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullar, J. D. and Webster, A. J. F. 1977. The energy cost of fat and protein deposition in the rat. Br. J. Nutr. 37: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rerat, A. and Henry, Y. 1964. [The protein requirements of the growing pig. I. The utilization of fish meal at 3 different levels.] Annls Zootech. 13: 5–33.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. and Norton, B. W. 1971. The utilization of the metabolizable energy of diets of different protein content by the milk-fed lamb. J. agric. Sci, Camb. 77: 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar