Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:37:26.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of spring-born suckled calves to the provision of supplementary feeding when grazing two sward heights in autumn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. A. Wright
I. A. Wright
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QS
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to measure the response of spring-born suckled calves to supplementary feeding when they grazed, with their dams, on swards of different heights in the autumn. Two swards were maintained at mean heights of either 5·8 cm or 9·0 cm, and calves were offered 0, 0·76 or 1 -51 kg organic matter (OM) per day of a commercially available supplement for a period of 60 days until weaning. Supplement intakes by the calves grazing the taller sward increased throughout the 60-day period, but did not exceed 0·75 kg OM per day. There was no response in terms of calf live-weight gain to the provision of supplement on the sward maintained at 9·0 cm. On the shorter sward, intake of supplement increased at a greater rate and reached 0·75 kg OM within 3 weeks. Maximum intake by those calves offered 1·51 kg supplement OM per day was 1·25 kg OM per day. The provision of supplementary feeding when mean sward height was 5·8 cm resulted in a significant increase in calf live-weight gain (P < 0·05), although supplementary feeding did not fully compensate for the reduction in milk and herbage intakes because of partial substitution of supplement for herbage. During the winter after weaning the calves that had previously grazed the shorter sward showed increased live-weight gain compared with those that had previously grazed the taller sward but prior supplementary feeding was without significant effect in this group.

Keywords

calvesgrazinggrowth ratesupplementary feeding
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 197 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, R. D. and Barker, J. M. 1978. Milk fed calves. 4. The effect of herbage allowance and milk intake upon herbage intake and performance of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Le Du, Y. L. P. and Alvarez, F. 1981. The herbage intake and performance of set-stocked suckler cows and calves. Grass and Forage Science 36: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Biennial report, The Hill Farming Research Organisation, 1984–85, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Le Du, Y. L. P., Macdonald, A. J. and Peart, J. N. 1979. Comparison of two techniques for estimating the milk production of suckler cows. Livestock Production Science 6: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Rev. ed. Bulletin, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, no 6.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986a. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986b. Determination of herbage intake of sucking lambs using long-chain n-alkanes as markers. Animal Production 42: 457 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Meijs, J. A. C. 1986. Concentrate supplementation of grazing dairy cows. 2. Effect of concentrate composition on herbage intake and milk production. Grass and Forage Science 41: 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijs, J. A. C. and Hoekstra, J. A. 1984. Concentrate supplementation of grazing dairy cows. 1. Effect of concentrate intake and herbage allowance on herbage intake. Grass and Forage Science 39: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. and Souter, W. 1981. Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Animal Production 32: 185–195.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Sibbald, A. M., Lamb, C. S., McCormack, H. A., Mayes, R. W. and Lees, J. A. 1986. The herbage intake of ewes grazing perennial ryegrass swards and when given supplements during lactation and in the autumn. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.), Occasional Publication, British Grassland Society no. 19, pp. 124–128.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1990. UK tables of nutritive value and chemical composition of stuffs. Rowett Research Services Ltd, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1987. The effect of sward height on beef cow performance and on the relationship between calf milk and herbage intakes. Animal Production 44: 363–370.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1987. The effects of genotype and post-weaning nutrition on compensatory growth in cattle reared as singles or twins. Animal Production 45: 423–432.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Whyte, T. K. 1989. Effects of sward surface height on the performance of continuously stocked spring-calving beef cows and their calves. Grass and Forage Science 44: 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar