Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:42:23.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Livestock nutrition and foodstuff research in Africa: when is a nutritional constraint not a priority research problem?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

J. Sumberg
J. Sumberg*
Affiliation:
School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines a paradox at the centre of efforts to improve livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. For decades livestock nutrition and animal food have been identified as critical constraints, yet producers have shown little interest in improved food technologies. The main argument is that the analyses highlighting nutrition and food as critical constraints have focused primarily on biological productivity, and are thus at odds with livestock producers’ perceptions. The paper concludes by suggesting that livestock research in Africa must taker greater account of different systems, situations and producers, as well as key characteristics of technology such as reliability and management flexibility.

Keywords

Africaanimal nutritionresearch.
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , December 2002 , pp. 332 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Delgado, C., Rosengrant, M., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S. and Courbois, C. 1999. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. Food, agriculture and the environment, discussion paper no. 28. IFPRI, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Elbasha, E., Thornton, P. K. and Tarawali, G. 1999. An ex post economic impact assessment of planted forages in West Africa. ILRI impact assessment series 2. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT. 2002. On-line statistical database: Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
International Livestock Research Institute. 2000. ILRI strategy to 2010: making the livestock revolution work for the poor. ILRI, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, R. R. von and Fitzhugh, H. A. 1993. Technical constraints to ruminant livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. In Animal production in developing countries (ed. Gill, M., Owen, E., Pollott, G. E. and Lawrence, T.L.J.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 16, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2002. Oxford English dictionary on-line. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reece, D. and Sumberg, J. 2002. More clients less resources: toward a conceptual framework for agricultural research in marginal areas. Technovation In press.Google Scholar
Reece, D., Sumberg, J. and Pommier, L. 2002. Using market segmentation to increase the impact of agricultural technology development: methodological considerations. Agricultural Systems Submitted.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. 1985. Farming systems research – a review. World Bank technical paper no. 43. The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Naazie, W. A., Larbi, A., Agyemang, K. and Tarawali, S. 1997. Integrated crop-livestock systems in sub-Saharan Africa: an option or an imperative? Outlook on Agriculture 26: 237–246.Google Scholar
Sumberg, J. 2002. The logic of fodder legumes in Africa. Food Policy 27: 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarawali, S. A. 1991. Preliminary agronomic evaluation of forage legumes for subhumid West Africa. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 68: 88–94.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. and Sumberg, J. 1994. A review of the evaluation and use of tropical forage legumes in sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 54: 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, R. 2001. Agricultural technology policies for rural development. Development Policy Review 19: 479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, R. O., Nilson-Leissner, G. and Trumble, H. C. 1953. Legumes in agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Wiggins, S. and Proctor, S. 2001. How special are rural areas? The economic implications of location for rural development. Development Policy Review 19: 427–436.Google Scholar
Winrock International. 1992. Assessment of animal agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Winrock International for the Institute of Agricultural Development, Morrelton, Arkansas.Google Scholar