Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:01:06.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental parameters necessary to define comfort for pigs, cattle and sheep in livestock transporters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Randall
J. M. Randall
Affiliation:
AFRC Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS
Get access

Abstract

Most livestock are transported at least once during their lifetime. Environmental conditions inside the transporter are critically dependent on many factors which can be controlled by well designed and carefully operated ventilation systems. Heat, moisture and carbon dioxide production of cattle, pigs and sheep are fitted to simple models as bases for ventilation design criteria. These assume that the animals are not well fed immediately before or during transport and that maintenance metabolic heat production applies. Interactions between temperature and humidity during transport are important at temperatures above 24°C.

Ventilation slots along the sides of transporters can be occluded by the bodies of the stock themselves. Relevant dimensions of pigs, cattle and sheep related to body weight are provided as additional design parameters. Stocking density interacts critically with other aspects of transport and normally recommended values are shown to be inconsistent. Space requirements should be based on species and body weight, provided that the ventilation capacity is satisfactory.

Proposed European regulations on the transport of livestock provide general guidelines for the provision of ventilation, but no means of achieving these requirements. This paper draws together detailed criteria for establishing acceptable space, thermal, psychrometric and gaseous conditions on transporters for pigs, cattle and sheep. Application of these quantitative criteria will assist shippers and regulating authorities in providing more suitable environmental conditions than are frequently achieved at present.

Keywords

humiditystocking densitytemperaturetransportventilation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 299 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture Canada. 1984. Recommended code of practice for care and handling of pigs. Publication 1771/E. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Albright, L. D. 1990. Environment control for animals and plants. ASAE textbook number 4. The American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. 1974. Heat loss from sheep. In Heat loss from animals and man (ed Monteith, J. L. and Mount, L. E.), pp. 173–203. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1987. Dimensions of livestock and poultry. In Data and standards handbook, pp. 391–398. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan.Google Scholar
Baxter, S. H. 1969. The environmental complex in livestock housing. Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1977. Environmental factors and their influence on the nutrition of farm livestock. In Nutrition and the climatic environment (eds. Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 1–16. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. 1981. Ventilation and temperature control criteria for pigs. In Environmental aspects of housing for animal production (ed. Clark, J. A.), pp. 197–216. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. M. and Clark, J. J. 1979. Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Animal Production 28: 353–369.Google Scholar
Commission Internationale du Genie Rural. 1984. Climatizatkvi of animal houses. Report of working group, CIGR, Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
DIN 18910. 1974. Klima im geschlossenen Stall, 1. Ockt. 1974 (Climate in closed livestock buildings), German Standard.Google Scholar
EEC Council Regulation. 1989. Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the protection of animals during transport. Official Journal of the European Communities 32: 36–47. COM(89) 322, 89/C214/06.Google Scholar
Esmay, M. L. 1982. Principles of animal environment — textbook edition. AVI Publishing Company, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Esmay, M. L. and Dixon, J. E. 1986. Environmental control for agricultural buildings. AVI Publishing Company, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1991. Report on the European Commission Proposals on the Transport of Animals. FAWC, Tolworth.Google Scholar
Grandin, T. 1982. Transportation of domestic animals. Proceedings of the symposium on management of food producing animals. Purdue University, West Lafeyette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Guise, H. J., Penny, R. H. C, Weeding, C. M. and Hunter, E. J. 1991. Recent studies in pig transport and lairage. Pig Veterinary Journal 26: 78–84.Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive. 1990. Occupational exposure limits 1990. Guidance note EH 40/90. Health and Safety Executive, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and Close, W. H. 1977. The influence of climatic variables on energy metabolism and associated aspects of productivity in the pig. In Nutrition and the climatic environment (ed. Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 51–73. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Larner, P. I. 1989. Survey and examination of maximum density of sheep loaded for international transport. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Dover.Google Scholar
McArthur, A. J. 1987. Thermal interaction between animal and microclimate: a comprehensive model. Journal of Tiieoretical Biology 126: 203–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArthur, A. J. 1991. Thermal interaction between animal and microclimate: specification “Standard Environmental Temperature” for animals outdoors. Journal of Theoretical Biology 148: 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. A. 1969. The environmental needs of farm animals and their heat output. Journal of the Institution of Heating and Ventilation Engineers 37: 201–203.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1986. Handling pigs from farm to slaughterhouse. Marketing and meat trade technical bulletin no. 74. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food. 1990. Codes of recommendations for the welfare of livestock, Pigs. PB0075. MAFF, London.Google Scholar
Müller, W. 1981. The problem of ensuring adequate ventilation during sea transport of livestock. Schlachten und Vermarkten 80: (3) 87–91. [Translation no. 9 by D. R. Bunn, AFRC Engineering, Silsoe.]Google Scholar
Müller, W. 1985. Ventilation requirements during air transport of animals. Proceedings of the eleventh international conference. pp. 29–31. Animal Air Transportation Association Inc., Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
Müller, W. 1987. Proposals for the calculation of ventilation rates during the carriage of cattle at sea. In Animal transport by sea, a collection of papers prepared for the Anitrans Conference (ed. Deere, Derek).Google Scholar
Müller, W. and Baumuller, J. 1978. Ventilation requirements of farm animals during air transport. Report No. 2. Maximum permitted loads according to the ventilation requirements of different types of animal. Translation no. 7, AFRC Engineering, Silsoe.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, G. A. and McQuitty, J. B. 1975. Response of calves to atmospheric hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. Annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineering, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, paper no.75-272. pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, G. A. and McQuitty, J. B. 1976. Manure gases in the animal environment — a literature review (with particular reference to cattle housing). Research bulletin 76-1, Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Alberta, pp. 1–80.Google Scholar
Petherick, J. C. 1983. A note on the allometric relationships in Large White × Landrace pigs. Animal Production 36: 497–500.Google Scholar
Petherick, J. C. and Baxter, S. H. 1981. Modelling the static spacial requirements of livestock. Proceedings of Commission Internationale du Genie Rural seminar on modelling, design and evaluation of agricultural buildings, Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit, Aberdeen, pp. 75–82.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1977. A handbook on the design of a ventilation system for livestock buildings using step control and automatic vents. National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, report no. 28, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1983. Humidity and water vapour transfer in finishing piggeries. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 28: 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpies, T. J. and Dumelow, J. 1988. Design data for sheep housing. Farm Buildings and Engineering 5: (2), 21–23.Google Scholar
Sharpies, T. J. and Dumelow, J. 1990. Prediction of body dimensions of Mule and Scottish Blackface ewes from measurement of body weight. Animal Production 50: 491–495.Google Scholar
Wathes, C. M., Jones, C. D. R. and Webster, A. J. F. 1983. Ventilation, air hygiene and animal health. Veterinary Record 113: 554–559.Google ScholarPubMed
Watts, M. E. T. 1982. Bulk transportation of farm animals by air and vehicular ferries. In Transport of animals intended for breeding, production and slaughter (ed. Moss, R.), pp. 147–165. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1974. Heat loss from cattle with particular emphasis on the effects of cold. In Heat loss from animals and man (ed. Monteith, J. L. and Mount, L. E.), pp. 205–231. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1981. Optimal housing criteria for ruminants. In Environmental aspects of housing for animal production (ed. Clark, J. A.), pp. 217–232. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar