Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:08:01.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The past, present and future genetic improvement of indigenous chicken of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2014

J.O. Khobondo ,
T.O. Okeno ,
G.O. Lihare ,
C.B. Wasike  and
A.K. Kahi
J.O. Khobondo*
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, PO Box 536, 20115Egerton, Kenya
T.O. Okeno
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, PO Box 536, 20115Egerton, Kenya Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, 8830Tjele, Denmark
G.O. Lihare
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, PO Box 536, 20115Egerton, Kenya Department of Animal Sciences, Maseno University, PO Box private Bag, Maseno, Kenya
C.B. Wasike
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Maseno University, PO Box private Bag, Maseno, Kenya
A.K. Kahi
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, PO Box 536, 20115Egerton, Kenya
*
Correspondence to: J.O. Khobondo, Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, PO Box 536, 20115 Egerton, Kenya. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Genetic improvement of farm animals encompasses both mating and selection for desired traits and indigenous chicken genetic resources are no exception. In Kenya, previous attempts to genetically improve indigenous chicken involved cross-breeding scheme by utilizing cockerels and pullets of exotic breeds with the local indigenous chicken. This scheme was complimented with farmer training on good management practices and vaccination for disease control. The scheme was partially successful with improved performance in the crossbreds that declined with subsequent generations. Failure of the programme to meet stakeholder's expectation led to its’ termination. The current attempt through the Smallholder Indigenous Chicken Improvement Programme has initiated an holistic and comprehensive approach to analysing the entire indigenous chicken actors and avert the causes of previous failures. The programme has genetically and phenotypically characterized the chicken; established reference/base population collected from different ecotypes/counties, established the breeding goals and designed breeding programmes that best suit the Kenyan stakeholders. The on-station research has reported variation on production traits, determined heritability estimate on growth. Current and ongoing research is focused on molecular characterization, selection for improved immune response, carcass quality, eggs production, growth and adaptation traits. The research is also concerned with conservation of these genetic resources.

Résumé

Lorsque l'on cherche à améliorer les caractères des animaux d’élevage, il faut envisager aussi bien les accouplements que la sélection génétique et en cela les ressources génétiques avicoles autochtones ne font pas exception. Au Kenya, les tentatives passées d'amélioration génétique des poules autochtones consistaient à croiser de jeunes mâles et femelles de races exotiques avec des coqs et des poules indigènes. Ce programme était complété par des formations aux éleveurs en bonnes pratiques de gestion et vaccination pour le contrôle des maladies. Ce système a joui d'un certain succès en raison de l'amélioration des performances que l'on atteignait sur les animaux croisés. Cependant, les résultats se détérioraient dans les générations suivantes. La non réponse aux attentes des acteurs impliqués conduisit à l'abandon de ce programme.

Actuellement, le Programme pour l'Amélioration des Poules Autochtones des Petits Éleveurs, suivant une approche holiste et intégratrice, prétend prendre en considération tous les acteurs impliqués dans l’élevage des poules autochtones afin d’éviter des échecs comme ceux survenus dans le passé. Le programme a caractérisé les poules aussi bien du point de vue génétique que phénotypique, a créé une population de référence constituée de poules de différents écotypes et départements, a fixé les objectifs de la sélection et a conçu les schémas de sélection qui satisfont le plus les parties prenantes kényanes. La recherche menée à la station a décelé une certaine variabilité dans les caractères productifs et a permis d'estimer l'héritabilité de la croissance. La recherche présente et future s'oriente vers la caractérisation moléculaire et la sélection pour l'amélioration de la réponse immunitaire, la qualité de la carcasse, la production d’œufs, la croissance et les caractéristiques d'adaptation. La recherche vise de même à conserver ces ressources génétiques.

Resumen

Cuando se desea mejorar cierto carácter en los animales de granja se debe prestar atención tanto a los apareamientos como a la selección genética y en ello los recursos genéticos avícolas autóctonos no son una excepción. En Kenia, los intentos pasados por mejorar la genética de las gallinas autóctonas consistieron en el cruzamiento de machos y hembras jóvenes de razas exóticas con gallos y gallinas autóctonos. Este esquema se completaba con la formación de los ganaderos en buenas prácticas de manejo y vacunación para la prevención de enfermedades. Este esquema resultó en cierto modo exitoso por la mejora de los rendimientos productivos que se alcanzaba en los animales cruzados. Sin embargo, los rendimientos empeoraban en las generaciones siguientes. La no satisfacción de las expectativas de las partes interesadas hizo que se acabase abandonando este programa.

En la actualidad, el Programa para la Mejora de las Gallinas Autóctonas de los Pequeños Propietarios pretende, con la adopción de un enfoque holístico e integrador, tener en cuenta a todos los agentes implicados en la cría de las gallinas autóctonas para así evitar que se repitan fracasos como los anteriores. El programa ha caracterizado las gallinas tanto desde un punto de vista genético como fenotípico, ha establecido una población base de referencia formada por aves de diferentes ecotipos y provincias, ha marcado los objetivos de la mejora y ha diseñado los esquemas de selección que, en mayor medida, satisfacen a los agentes keniatas implicados. La investigación llevada a cabo en la estación ha sacado a la luz la existencia de cierta variabilidad en los caracteres productivos y ha permitido estimar la heredabilidad del crecimiento. La investigación presente y futura va encaminada a la caracterización molecular y a la selección para la mejora de la respuesta inmune, la calidad de la canal, la producción de huevos, el crecimiento y las características de adaptación. La investigación busca asimismo la conservación de estos recursos genéticos.

Keywords

indigenous chickenKenyagenetic improvementgenotypesbreeding programmespoules autochtonesKenyaamélioration génétiquegénotypesprogrammes de sélectiongallinas autóctonasKeniamejora genéticagenotiposprogramas de selección
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 55 , December 2014 , pp. 125 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akishinonomiya, F., Miyake, T., Sumi, S., Takada, M., Ohno, S. & Kondo, N. 1994. One subspecies of the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallusgallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 12505–12509.Google Scholar
Akishinonomiya, F., Miyake, T., Takada, M., Shingu, R., Endo, T., Gojobori, T., Kondo, N. & Ohno, S. 1996. Monophyletic origin and unique dispersal patterns of domestic fowls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 6792–6795.Google Scholar
Bett, H.K., Peters, K.J. & Bokelman, W. 2011. Hedonic price analysis to guide inbreeding and production of indigenous chicken in Kenya. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 23: 6.Google Scholar
Bett, H.K., Musyoka, M.P., Peters, K.J. & Bokelmann, W. 2012a. Demand for meat in the rural and urban areas of Kenya: a focus on the indigenous chicken. Econ. Res. Int. Article ID 401472, 10.Google Scholar
Bett, H.K., Bett, R.C., Peters, K.J., Kahi, A.K. & Bokelmann, W. 2012b. Linking utilization and conservation of indigenous chicken genetic resources to value chains. J. Anim. Prod. Adv., 2: 33–51.Google Scholar
Blench, R. & Macdonald, K.C. 2000. Chickens. In Kiple, K.F. and Ornelas, K.C., eds. The cambridge world history of food, Vol. 1, pp. 496–499. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blesbois, E. 2007. Current status in avian semen cryopreservation. World's Poult. Sci. J., 63(2): 213–222.Google Scholar
Blesbois, E., Grasseau, I., Seigneurin, F., Mignon-Grasteau, S., Saint Jalme, M. & Mialon-Richard, M.M. 2008. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology, 261(2): 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannang, E. & Persson, S. 1990. Hand book on Ethiopia animal husbandry. Uppsala, Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Chemjor, W. 1998. Energy and protein requirements of growing indigenous chickens of Kenya. Egerton University, Kenya, pp. 83 (MSc thesis).Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, J. 1993. The spread of domestic animals in Africa. In Shaw, T., Sinclair, P., Andah, B. and Okpoko, A., eds. The archaeology of Africa: food, metals and towns, pp. 61–70. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Crawford, R.D. 1976. Incomplete dominance of the gene for naked neck in the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci., 55: 820–822.Google Scholar
Crawford, R.D. 1990. Origin and history of poultry species. In Crawford, R.D., ed., Poultry breeding and genetics, pp. 1–41. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Dana, N. 2011. Breeding programs for indigenous chicken in Ethiopia Analysis of diversity in production systems and chicken populations. Wageningen University, The Netherlands (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Dana, N., Van der Waaij, E.H. & Van Arendok, J.A. 2011. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for body weights and egg production in Horro chicken of Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 43: 21–28.Google Scholar
DZARC (DebreZeit Agricultural Research Centre), 1991. Annual Research Report. DebreZeit, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
DZARC (DebreZeit Agricultural Research Centre), 2007. Annual Research Report. DebreZeit, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, J., Larsen, G., Gunnarsson, U., Bed‟hom, B., Tixier-Boichard, M., Stromstedt, L., Wright, D., Jungerius, A., Vereijken, A., Randi, E., Jensen, P. & Andersson, L. 2008. Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals the hybrid origin of domestic fowl. PLoS Genet., 4: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Scientific, New York.Google Scholar
FAO. 2007a. The structure and importance of the commercial and village based poultry systems in Kenya, Rome, Italy, 92 pp.Google Scholar
FAO. 2007b. The State of the World?s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by Barbara Rischkowsky & Dafydd Pilling. Rome. (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1250e/a1250e00.htm).Google Scholar
FAO. 2010. Chicken genetic resources used in smallholder production systems and opportunities for their development, by Sørensen, P.. FAO Smallholder Poultry Production Paper No. 5. Rome.Google Scholar
Gondwe, T.N.& Wollony, C.B. 2007. Local chicken production system in Malawi: household flock structure, dynamics, management and health. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guèye, H.F. 2003. Production and consumption trends in Africa. World's Poult. Sci. J., 19(11): 12–14.Google Scholar
Horst, P. 1989. Native fowls as reservoir for genomes and major genes with direct and indirect effect on the adaptability and their potential for tropically oriented breeding plans. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 53: 93–101.Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. 1949. Genetics of the fowl. NewYork, USA, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Islam, M.A. & Nishibori, M. 2009. Indigenous naked neck chicken: a valuable genetic resource for Bangladesh. World's Poult. Sci. J., 65: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaingu, F.B., Kibor, A.C., Shivairo, R., Kutima, H., Okeno, T.O., Waihenya, R. & Kahi, A.K. 2010. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthes and coccidia in indigenous chicken from different agroclimatic zones in Kenya. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 56: 458–462.Google Scholar
Khobondo, J.O. 2012. Auto antibodies in Calf are affected by age and Diet. Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands (MSc thesis).Google Scholar
Kingori, A.M., Wachira, A.M. & Tuitoek, J.K. 2010. Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: a review. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9(4): 309–316.Google Scholar
Kitalyi, A.J. 1998. Village chicken production systems in rural Africa: household food security and gender issues. Animal Production and Health Paper No. 142, Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
K.N.B.S. 2010. Economic survey 2010: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Nairobi, Kenya, Government Printer, pp. 307.Google Scholar
Liu, Yi-Ping, Wu, G-S., Yao, Y-G., Miao, Y-W., Luikart, G., Baig, M., Beja-Pereira, A., Ding, Z-L., Palanichamy, M.G. & Zhang, Y-P. 2006. Multiple maternal origins of chickens: out of the Asian jungles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 38: 12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magothe, T.M., Muhuyi, W.B. & Kahi, A.K. 2010. Influence of major genes for crested-head, frizzle-feather and naked-neck on body weights and growth patterns of indigenous chickens reared intensively in Kenya.Google Scholar
Magothe, T.M., Okeno, T.O., Muhuyi, W.B. & Kahi, A.K. 2012. Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: current status. World's Poult. Sci. J., 68: 119–132.Google Scholar
Maina, J.O. 2000. Morphological and molecular characterization of Kenyan indigenous chickens. Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Mérat, P. 1986. Potential usefulness of the Na (naked neck) gene in poultry production. World's Poult. Sci. J., 42(2): 124–142.Google Scholar
Moiseyeva, I.G., Romanov, M.N., Nikiforov, A.A., Sevastyanova, A.A. & Semyenova, S.K. 2003. Evolutionary relationships of red jungle fowl and chicken breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol., 35: 403–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Msoffe, P.M., Mtambo, M.A., Minga, U.M., Gwakisa, P.S., Mdegela, R.H. & Olsen, J.E. 2002. Productivity and natural disease resistance potential of free-ranging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 14(3): 2002.Google Scholar
Muchadeyi, F.C., Eding, H., Wollny, C.B.A., Groeneveld, E., Makuza, S.M., Shamseldin, R., Simianer, H. & Weigend, S. 2007a. Absence of population substructuring in Zimbabwe chicken ecotypes inferred using microsatellite analysis. Anim. Genet., 38: 332–339.Google Scholar
Muchadeyi, F.C., Wollny, C.B.A., Eding, H., Weigend, S., Makuza, M. & Simianer, H. 2007b. Variation in village chicken production systems among agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 453–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mwacharo, J.M., Nomura, K., Hanada, H., Jianlin, O., Hanotte, O. & Amano, T. 2007. Genetic relationships among Kenyan and other East African indigenous chickens. Anim. Genet., 38: 485–490.Google Scholar
Mwacharo, J.M., Nomura, K., Hanada, H., Han, J.L., Amano, T. & Hanotte, O. 2013. Reconstructing the origin and dispersal patterns of village chickens across East Africa; insights from autosomal markers. Mol. Ecol., 22: 2683–2697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ndegwa, J.M., Mead, R.R., Norrish, P., Shephered, D.D., Kimani, C.W. & Wachira, A.M. 2012. Growth characteristics of six reciprocal crosses of Kenyan indigenous chicken. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4: 156–160.Google Scholar
Ngeno, K. 2011. Genetic analysis of growth patterns in different ecotypes of indigenous chicken populations in Kenya. Egerton University, Kenya (MSc thesis).Google Scholar
Ngeno, K., Vander Waaij, E. H. & Kahi, A. 2014. Indigenous chicken genetic resources in Kenya: their unique attributes and conservation options for improved use. World's Poultry Science Journal, 70: 173–184.Google Scholar
Nishibori, M., Shimogiri, T., Hayashi, T. & Yasua, H. 2005. Molecular evidence for hybridization of species in the genus Gallus except for Gallus varius . Anim. Genet., 36(5): 367–75.Google Scholar
Njega, S.M. 2005. Productivity and socio-cultural aspects of local poultry phenotypes in Coastal Kenya. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (RVAU), Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 79. (MSc dessertation).Google Scholar
Okeno, T.O., Kahi, A.K. & Peters, J.K. 2010. Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Production Systems in Kenya: Household flock Structures Dynamics and breeding practices. Biennial conference paper. pp. 877–884.Google Scholar
Okeno, T.O., Kahi, A.K. & Peters, K.J. 2011. Breed selection practices traits of economic importance for indigenous chicken in Kenya. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 20(10).Google Scholar
Okeno, T.O., Kahi, A.K. & Peters, J.K. 2012. Characterization of indigenous chicken production systems in Kenya. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 44: 601–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okeno, T.O., Kahi, A.K. & Peters, K.J. 2013. Evaluation of breeding objectives for purebred and crossbred selection schemes for adoption in indigenous chicken breeding programmes. Br. Poult. Sci., 54(1): 62–75.Google Scholar
Olwande, P.O., Ogara, W.O., Okuthe, S.O., Muchemi, G., Okoth, E., Odindo, M.O. & Adhiambo, R.F. 2010. Assessing the productivity of indigenous chickens in an extensive management system in southern Nyanza, Kenya. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 42: 283–288.Google Scholar
Parmentier, H.K., Baelmans, R., Savelkoul, H.F.J., Dorny, P., Demey, F. & Berkvens, D. 2004. Serum haemolytic complement activities in 11 different MHC (B) typed chicken lines. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 100: 25–32.Google Scholar
Safalaoh, A.C.L. 2001. Village chicken upgrading programme in Malawi. World's Poult. Sci. J., 57: 179–188.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2013. The Millennium Development Goal Report.Google Scholar
Wainaina, G. M. 1994. The role of national poultry development programme in poultry development in Kenya. In Proceedings of the National Poultry Development Programme annual seminar, Machakos, Kenya.Google Scholar
West, B. & Zhou, B. X. 1988. Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. Journal of Archaeological Science, 15(5): 515–533.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. 2000. Did chicken go west? In Blench, R.M. and MacDonald, K.C., eds. Origins and development of African livestock: archaeology, genetics, linguistics and ethnography, pp. 368–448. London, University College London (UCL).Google Scholar