Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:13:38.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On-farm investigation of local chicken biodiversity and performance potentials in rural areas of Jordan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

A. Abdelqader ,
C.B.A. Wollny  and
M. Gauly
A. Abdelqader
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Husbandry in the Tropics and Subtropics, Georg August University Göttingen, Kellnerweg 6, 37077 Goettingen, Germany
C.B.A. Wollny
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
M. Gauly
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Summary

On-farm surveys were conducted to investigate the biodiversity of local chickens and their performance potential. The study was carried out in rural areas of northern Jordan. A sample of 846 adult local chickens was phenotypically characterized based on morphology, feather colors, comb shape and performance. Body measurements for cluster analyses were recorded on 460 adult females. The most predominant chicken type was the Jordan Baladi (67.3%) followed by the Pakistani (27.7%) and the Brahma (5%). Cluster analyses showed that the three populations are distinct. The Jordan Baladi and the Pakistani were closer to each other than the Brahma. Plumage colors were observed either as single color or mottled (a mix of many colors). The latter was the most predominant (23.1 %) followed by black (19.5%) and light brownish (19.1%). The single comb type was the most predominant (80.3%). Hens of the local chicken reached sexual maturity at about 22-30 weeks of age. The average clutch number was 1-5 per year, with 18-30 eggs per clutch. Each hen laid on average 68.9±3.3 eggs per year. The body size of adult females and males was about 1 240±10g and 1 890±30g, respectively. Indiscriminate crossbreeding was taking place frequently. Genetic characterization would complement the phenotypic characterization and should be conducted. This would help to initiate a program for the preservation of genetic diversity in local chickens in Jordan.

Résumé

Une enquête a été menée au nord de la Jordanie pour caractériser la diversité des poules locales ainsi que leur potentiel de production. Les informations recueillies sur un échantillon de 846 poules adultes portaient entre autres sur les caractéristiques morphologiques, la couleur du plumage et la forme de la crête. Il existe trois principales variétés de poules locales: le Baladi (67,3%), le Pakistani (27,7%) et le Brahma (5%). La couleur du plumage est soit uniforme soit composite. Les plumages bigarrées (23,1%), uniformément noires (19,5%) et uniformément brun clair (19,1%) sont prédominantes. La majorité (80,3%) des poules ont une seule crête. Les poules locales atteignent leur maturité sexuelle entre 22 et 30 mois d'âge. Le nombre moyen de couvée par an varie entre 1 et 5 et le nombre d'oeufs par couvée entre 18 et 30. Chaque poule couve en moyenne 68,9±3,3 oeufs par an. Le poids moyen de la femelle adulte est de 1 240±10 g et celui du male adulte de 1 890±30 g. Des métissages incontrôlés sont fréquents. Une caractérisation génétique est indispensable pour confirmer les résultats de la présente étude et pour l'initiation d'un programme de préservation de la diversité génétique existante entre et dans les races locales de poules en Jordanie.

Resumen

Se ha llevado a cabo una encuesta en el norte de Jordania para caracterizar la diversidad de las razas de gallinas locales así como su potencial de producción . Las informaciones recogidas sobre una muestra de 846 gallinas adultas comprendían, entre otras, las características morfológicas, el color de las plumas y la forma de la cresta. Existen tres principales razas de gallinas locales: la Baladi (67,3%), la Pakistani (27,7%) y la Brahma (5%). El color de la pluma es o bien uniforme o bien compuesto. Predominan los plumajes compuestos con el 23,1%, los negros con el 19,5% y los marrones 68,9±3,3 huevos por año. El peso medio de la hembra adulta es de 1,240±10 gr y el del macho adulto de 1,890±30 gr. Son frecuentes los cruces incontrolados. Es indispensable iniciar una caracterización genética para confirmar los resultados del presente estudio y para poder iniciar un programa de conservación de la diversidad genética existente entre y dentro de la razas locales de gallinas en Jordania.

Keywords

Genetic resourcesJordanLocal chickenPerformancePhenotype diversity.
Type
Research Articles
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 43 , April 2008 , pp. 49 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Abdelqader, A. & Wollny, C.B.A.. 2004. Adaptive Traits and Characterization of the Production System of Local Chickens in Jordan. Deutscher Tropentag. <www.tropentag.de/2004/abstracts/links/Abdelqader_MsiHQmLp.pdf>. Accessed on November 28, 2006.+Accessed+on+November+28,+2006>Google Scholar
Benabdeljelil, K. & Arfaoui, T.. 2001. Characterization of Beldi chicken and turkeys in rural poultry flocks of Morocco: Current state and future outlook. Animal Genetic Resources Information 31, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benítez, Fraga. 2002. Reasons for the use and Conservation of Some Local Genetic Resources in Poultry. 7th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23, 2002, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Dessie, T. & Ogle, B.. 2001. Village Poultry Production System in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 33, 521–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO. 2004a. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System. FAO, Rome <http://dad.fao.org/en/refer/library/sow/597.pdf>. Accessed on February 28, 2007..+Accessed+on+February+28,+2007.>Google Scholar
FAO. 2004b. FAOSTAT Database. FAO, Rome <http://faostat.fao.org/faostat>. Accessed on February 28, 2007..+Accessed+on+February+28,+2007.>Google Scholar
Gondwe, T.N.P. 2004. Characterization of local chicken in low input-low output production systems: Is there scope for appropriate production and breeding strategies in Malawi? Phd Thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Gueye, H.F. 1998. Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World's Poultry Science Journal 54, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, M., Rodero, E., Gutierrez, M.J., Pena, F. & Rodero, J.M.. 1996. Application of multifactorial discriminant analysis in the morphostructural differentiation of Andalusian caprine breeds. Small Ruminant Research. 22, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, P. 1989. Native fowl as reservoir for genomes and major genes with direct and indirect effects on the adaptability and their potential for tropically oriented breeding plans. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 53 (3), 93–101.Google Scholar
Jordan Meteorological Department. 2007. <www.jmd.gov.jo>. Acessed on February 28, 2007..+Acessed+on+February+28,+2007.>Google Scholar
Jordan Ministry of Agriculture. 2005. Annual agriculture report. Amman. Jordan.Google Scholar
Jordana, J., Ribo, O. & Pelegrin, M.. 1993. Analysis of genetic relationships from morphological characters in Spanish goat breeds. Small Ruminant Research. 12, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minga, U.M., Katule, A.M., Maeda, T. & Musasa, J.. 1989. Potential of the traditional chicken industry in Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the 7th Tanzania Veterinary Association Scientific Conference. TVA Vol. 7: 207–215.Google Scholar
Missohou, A., Sow, R.S. & Ngwe-Assoumou, C.. 1998. Caractéristiques morphobiométriques de la poule du Sénégal. Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin 24, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwalusanya, N.A., Katule, A.M., Mutayoba, S.K., Mtambo, M.M.A., Olsen, J.E. & Minga, U.M.. 2002. Productivity of Local Chickens under Village Management Conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production 34, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, C.V. 2002. Production of semi-scavenging chicken in Zimbabwe. PhD Thesis. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
SAS. 1999. SAS Users Guide, Version 8.1, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Tadelle, D., Million, T., Alemu, Y. & Peters, K.J.. 2003a. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 1. Flock characteristics and performance. Livestock Research for rural development 15(1). <www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm>. Accessed on February 28, 2007..+Accessed+on+February+28,+2007.>Google Scholar
Tadelle, D., Million Talemu, Y. & Peters, K.J. 2003b. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 2. Use patterns and performance valuation and chicken products and socio-economic functions of chicken. Livestock Research for rural development. 15(1). <http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm>. Accessed on February 28, 2007..+Accessed+on+February+28,+2007.>Google Scholar
Wimmers, K., Ponsuksili, S., Hardge, T., Valle-Zarate, A., Mathur, P.K. & Horst, P.. 2000. Genetic distinctness of African, Asian and South American local chickens. Animal Genetics 31, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaitoun, I.S., Tabbaa, M.J. & Bdour, S.. 2005. Differentiation of native goat breeds of Jordan on the basis of morphostructural characteristics. Small Ruminant Research. 56, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar